While the minus is indeed simple and quick, there is a second-opinion
that it poses a "risk".
Here is a review by a myopia-prevention person.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV0lmFCeCMw&feature=related

Dear Second-opinion friend,
Why not ask your optometrist to watch this video.
Then ask him to help you with prevention.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSvu_6P6AmU

Dear Bill,
Some people don't belong in a scientific study.
But, since Colgate was successful, and the science behind PREVENTION
is excellent, I would expect other scientists could accomplish what he

For reasons of academic freedom, and freedom of speech, here is
analytical chapter 7.
For a brief description of how to implement plus-prevention (before
the minus) just click here:

Dear Scientific friends,
Subject: I have not sold a book in the last five years.
The "cost" of the book was the "cost" of the paper it was written on.
I simply have no interest in "business", or "making money" a some like

Subject:  Other Doctors have advocated plus prevention as you have.
I have taken the time to review this issue – over the last 150 years.
Below is a statement by Dr. Prentice.
The problem is that this “advocacy” is rejected by the public as

The curves presented in:
http://myopiafree.i-see.org/soonicansee/index.html
either have some relation to reality or have been faked.
If there is a reasonable relationship to reality, I do not understand

There was an issue that our book, How to avoid nearsightdnes" was not
"FREE".
To resolve that issue, here is a technical anlaysis of a scientific
experiment conducted by Dr. Francis Young.

Here is Dr. Colgate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_Colgate
Now let me see.
Who do I belive?

Dear Scientific friends,
It is always of value to take the time to understand the WISDOM of the
second-opinion professionals.
Here is a statement by Steve Leung for your interest.

This is a description of FREE prevention.  That is not a "cure" but a
matter of how to avoid ENTRY into a negative refractive STATE.
The "software" compresses the graph of the natural eye's response to a
long-term "near" environment.  Remember this is not about "cause" but

Lest anybody forget....
Otis was trying desperately to sell a book about his myopia prevention
theory -- basically until I called him on it, repeatedly and
publicly.  He probably still tries to sell it, though.

Dear PREVENTION minded friends,
Subject: Newday for our children -- if we are prepared to learn.
It is possible to DISAGREE about the proven dynamic behavior of the
fundamental eye (as pure science) with out being DISAGREEABLE.

Dear Mike,
Sorry you are a slow reader and have not gotten to Chaper 11:
BUT DOES IT WORK?
Thinking is easy,

Yes, they do:
http://myopiafree.i-see.org/FAYoung.html
Enjoy,