| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Accurately measuring dioptre of specs | 13 Sep 2007 15:22 GMT | 22 |
I have a dozen pairs of ready-made reading glasses. Most of them no longer have the strength of the lenses marked on them. I do recall that they were originally marked to within 0.25 dioptre. How can I work out the dioptre value of each pair using home equipment?
|
| pharmcy | 12 Sep 2007 17:58 GMT | 11 |
|
| To Andrew | 12 Sep 2007 17:31 GMT | 32 |
To Andrew: I am totally fed up with you. You are a disgusting mega-SMUG and a BULLSHITTER par excellance. I thought that you have finished your "mission" on s.m.v. and might come back only at some future time, like
|
| Taking Sides, or Us Against Them | 12 Sep 2007 15:48 GMT | 2 |
There seems to be a "war" here between two camps - the established "main stream" medical camp v. the "alternative" gang. Interestingly, usually there are no substantive disagreements within the established camp, but none of the current main players in the "alternative gang"
|
| Retreat From Reason | 12 Sep 2007 04:44 GMT | 101 |
Source: David Harrison, "New age therapies cause 'retreat from reason'," The Sunday Telegraph, August 8, 2007 Prof Dawkins says that alternative remedies constitute little more than a "money-spinning, multi-million pound industry that impoverishes
|
| Is this eye movement "esophoric"? | 12 Sep 2007 01:17 GMT | 10 |
Dear Absolutely Bates, Subject: Does reading "strain" induce a negative refractive STATE -- or not? Is this the type of problem that Bates described.
|
| glasses intermittently make vision blurrier -- why? | 11 Sep 2007 20:52 GMT | 14 |
My daughter has infrequently said that her glasses make her see worse. That complaint has applied to both new and old prescriptions. This isn't every time, of course. Usually her glasses do what they're supposed to do.
|
| SLT for Glaucoma | 11 Sep 2007 16:25 GMT | 8 |
My doc is suggesting that the SLT treatment might be helpful for my glaucoma - it is pretty well controlled with just Timolol. What experience with this is out there?
|
| Polycarbonate versus High Index Plastic (1.67) lens help! | 11 Sep 2007 04:15 GMT | 18 |
I just picked up a new pair of glasses from Lenscrafters. They recommended Polycarbonate because it was apparently shatterproof etc etc. My prescription is -5 and -5.25, so I think that's fairly high. The frames are a lot smaller, almost a 40% smaller than my old (13 yr
|
| Enuf is Enuf | 11 Sep 2007 04:11 GMT | 84 |
I came across a very interesting posts when I stumbled across it by accident. Tell me what do you thinik? Has the situation gotted out of hand? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/23a84081854a3 843/f5780d5605b5d279#f5780d5605b5d279
|
| Simple saline for RGP? | 10 Sep 2007 16:02 GMT | 5 |
I'm looking for something to splash in my eyes before removing my RGP lenses at night. I don't want any fancy ingredients, just to make sure they are "unstuck" since they tend to be a little dry at the end of the day. I thought some kind of soft contact solution might work, but ...
|
| Complication of Cataract operation | 10 Sep 2007 13:29 GMT | 19 |
My father is in his 70's and has recently undergone cataract surgery on his left eye and as a result his eyesight is much improved. However, he quickly noticed after surgery that he had 'something' at the left hand edge of his vision that wasn't there before. He
|
| A Myopia Prevention Quiz by Dr. Ralls | 10 Sep 2007 13:03 GMT | 70 |
Dear Second-opinion friends, Here is a short quiz developed by Dr. Julie Ralls, MD. There is a CONSISTENT under-current in medicine and optometry -- to the effect that a negative refractive STATE for
|
| Contact Lense Prescription problem | 09 Sep 2007 17:17 GMT | 5 |
I recently went to the eye doctor and got a prescription for glasses and contact lenses. My first appointment, he gave me my glasses prescription which was: OD: Sphere -1.75
|
| The Bates Method Never Disproven | 08 Sep 2007 18:08 GMT | 27 |
It is very clear that the Bates method has never, not once been disproven by anyone. In fact, each argument raised by his opponents are always wrong. But is anybody here intelligent enough to actually disprove him, even on
|