| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| A Scientist Supports Prevention with the Plus | 25 Nov 2004 04:44 GMT | 12 |
Dear Friends, There is a tendancy for some ODs to state that "all scientists believe", and then insert THEIR unproven beliefs -- as science.
|
| Can the pilot "clear" from 20/50? | 25 Nov 2004 02:22 GMT | 6 |
Dear Prevention Minded Friends. Subject: Is it possible to clear vision from 20/50 to 20/20? Re: Possible "Spontaneous" vision clearing with a plus. Jack is a pilot and wishes to become a military pilot.
|
| Proving the dynamic nature of the fundamental eye --- for RM | 25 Nov 2004 01:21 GMT | 8 |
Dear RM, Subject: Honesty with objective SCIENTIF facts. Honesty with pilots who wish to keep their distant vision clear. Re: Placing ALL THE SCIENTIFIC FACTS on the table as well
|
| Have Toric lenses advanced past 4 years? | 24 Nov 2004 01:19 GMT | 10 |
I have messed up eyes and as a stop gap to LASIK I'd like to give contacts another shot. Last I was fitted with contacts was 2001 and the doc gave me contacts made by CooperVision called Frequency 55 (methafilcon B) Toric.
|
| The quality of "proof" -- the quality of support for prevention. | 23 Nov 2004 19:29 GMT | 23 |
Dear Prevention minded friends, Subject: Pure scientific proof versus pseudo-medical proof RM > I know better than all of you. When you run experiments yourself concerning the
|
| Got Contacts Today--First Time Ever. Help! | 23 Nov 2004 08:01 GMT | 5 |
Hi all! I went to the eye doctor today and instead of getting Eyeglasses with Varilux lenses, I went with soft contacts. I'm SICK of wearing glasses! I always have had two pairs--one for reading, the other for driving. I only wore the lenses for about 4 hours today--as recommended ...
|
| Lens material choice for safety glasses? | 22 Nov 2004 04:14 GMT | 1 |
I've got an eye exam coming up, which I expect to show nothing more than the stable and mild myopia I've had since I was young. My prescription runs about OD-1.0/OS-1.25 and has, with minor variants, stayed the same for 35 years.
|
| glasses just for astigmatism | 21 Nov 2004 19:01 GMT | 2 |
Would appreciate any answers to these questions: 1) does astigmatism affect vision equally at short and long distances? 2) are there different kinds of astigmatism? 3) I am myopic, so I don't need reading glasses.,However, if I would like to
|
| please help make sense out of diagnosis | 21 Nov 2004 18:52 GMT | 6 |
I recently lost my glasses and sought to replace them. My eye exam was the first in 5 years, so it isn't surprising that my prescription changed. It was formerly R=0.75 and L=1.00. The new prescription based upon my exam was R=1.25 and L=1.25, with an
|
| Francine | 21 Nov 2004 15:31 GMT | 4 |
Dear Fran, Yes, there are all kinds of visual disasters "out there". Indeed, I do not deal with them. The minus lens works "perfectly" in 15 minutes,
|
| John Doe still at 20/40 despite use of plus lenses for 3 years | 21 Nov 2004 12:55 GMT | 23 |
Dear Prevention-minded colleagues, I have a case report I would like to inform the group about. I had a patient return today for a reexamination for eyeglasses. I will call him John Doe to protect his privacy.
|
| Best vision? | 21 Nov 2004 02:06 GMT | 3 |
Good Day All What progressive lens would provide me the best vision?I am looking at Zeiss and Rodenstock lens and frames.My prescription is:O.D. +0.50 -0.75 X 090 | |+1.50O.S. +0.50 -1.00 X 094
|I work at a computer. I also do hands on repairs of ... |
| positive angle kappa and albinism | 20 Nov 2004 04:50 GMT | 1 |
I have heard that positive angle kappa with nystagmus is a sign of ocular albinism. Is this a reliable test for albinism? Dave
|
| how to design 2D low pass filter that works with cycle per degree? | 19 Nov 2004 13:35 GMT | 4 |
I need to design a spatial 2D low pass filter, which cuts off high frequence component beyond C cycle per degree... Now I am given an image bitmap, which is MxN pixels... How can I design such a filter, how do I relate pixels to cycle per degree?
|
| RM asks the wrong questions -- and always ingores the correct answers. | 19 Nov 2004 00:53 GMT | 22 |
Not.txt Subject: Re: Challenging questions that Otis can't answer Dear Optomterist RM, My, that's presumptuous!
|