You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: The Scientific Basis of Soon's Graph
| Dr Judy | 26 Jun 2009 19:20 |
> Subject: The Scientific Basis of Soon’s Graph. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > D. I. Flitcroft From the conclusion: "In keeping with the previously reported associations of myopia with esophoria, poor accommodation function and high AC/A ratios, these conditions increase the amount of myopia produced under intensive near viewing conditions but do not lead to myopia during mainly distance viewing. This model provides quantitative validation of the hypothesis that the epidemiological association between myopia and increased nearwork may be caused by a disturbance of normal emmetropization by steady state errors of accommodation. "
Flitcroft states that poor accommodation function may lead to increased myopia with near work. He does not mention use of minus lenses to correct myopia as a factor, nor does he say anything about "stair case myopia", nor does his paper support Soon's Graph.
Poor accommodation function and steady state errors exist with or without myopia and minus lenses. Wearing plus at near will not improve poor accommodation, nor will wearing minus make good function turn into poor function.
And his paper is speculative, not measured. Do you have any actual measured evidence to support Soon's Graph?
Judy
|
| Otis | 26 Jun 2009 13:10 |
Subject: The Scientific Basis of Soon’s Graph.
Re: Ophthalmologist D. I. Flitcroft’s Analytic Paper of the Fundamental Eye's Dynamic Behavior
Soon’s graphs are simplification and clarification of developing scientific and medical thinking about the behavior of the fundamental eye.
Thus, while denied by the majority-opinion optometrists, they are analyzed ophthalmologists.
For the record, here is the paper. Since many of you don’t like the concept of prevention, and to respect Dr. D. I. Flitcroft, let us just call this the professional (preventive) second-opinion, and thus avoid the endless personal attacks that have no place in science.
Perhaps this paper is on the “Web”. Maybe some of you could find it?
VISION RESEARCH
PERGAMON
Vision Research 38 (1998) 2869 – 2879
A Model of the contribution of oculomotor and optical factors to emmetropization and myopia.
D. I. Flitcroft
INSTITUTE OF OPHTHALMOLOGY University College Dublin 60 Eccles Street Dublin 7, Ireland
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this work was to investigate quantitatively the interactions between accommodation, vergence and a mechanism of emmetropization driven by optical blur within the retinal image with a view to developing a model that provides and explanation of both normal emmetropization and near-work associated myopia…..
I would recommend that anyone who wishes to challenge Soon’s graph (which is an extension of this paper, obtain the paper and READ IT.
Enjoy,
Otis
|
Quick links: