Re: CANNOT SEE TO READ
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: CANNOT SEE TO READ
| Mike Tyner | 26 May 2008 21:44 |
> are simple refractive changes, cataracts, and potential retinal > problems (diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, etc.) And such > an examination is directly in line with the skills and scope of > practice of optometrists, as well as ophthalmologists, both groups who > have "medical" training regarding the eye. I think the first doctor (an optometrist) had it right. He described yellowing and vacuoles. He blamed the diplopia on vacuoles ("little lenses") and while that was hogwash, it was closer than anyone else got.
Our OP (ray) said, early on, that his only symptom was monocular polyopia OU. There just aren't that many things that cause monocular polyplopia OU at age 67.
Fuch's isn't on the list, short of fresh central erosions. Fuch's is a red herring, when it comes to explaining the symptoms.
Ray described one LED looking like six, each in focus. He's got refractile wedges and medicare won't pay until he degrades to 20/40.
I didn't think early Fuch's was such a barrier to surgery, and I suspect another surgeon might not be so put off.
But waiting for 20/40 seems ill advised.
-MT
|
| p.clarkii@gmail.com | 26 May 2008 05:10 |
> > Does Fuchs's appear to be similar to a mass of blood (or similar material) > > in that when the eye is not very active it spreads across the vision to [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > blob that may cover 50 percent of the field of view (sitting in the > > center)? thanks, mike, for the clarifications of a number of points that irked me when I read this thread from the start.
Fuch's is quite easy to diagnose in a simple slit-lamp evaluation. And its possible but not likely that the original poster really has this condition anyway so its mention takes the thread off a little off topic. I think the most likely conditions that need to be ruled out are simple refractive changes, cataracts, and potential retinal problems (diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, etc.) And such an examination is directly in line with the skills and scope of practice of optometrists, as well as ophthalmologists, both groups who have "medical" training regarding the eye.
|
| Mike Tyner | 26 May 2008 03:33 |
> Does Fuchs's appear to be similar to a mass of blood (or similar material) > in that when the eye is not very active it spreads across the vision to > simulate a very thin covering and when the eye is active it coalesces into > a > blob that may cover 50 percent of the field of view (sitting in the > center)? Fuch's makes the back side of the cornea look a little like frosted glass, the texture of an orange peel.
There is no blood, and no "blob" to form any image.
The central cornea is usually worst, and the hazy vision isn't usually concentrated in any particular field or direction.
Fuch's is not rare, and it's difficult to miss if you're paying attention.
-MT, OD
>>It is a long shot but some of the symptoms you are describing are >>Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy. Many doctors don't find it because it is [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > blob that may cover 50 percent of the field of view (sitting in the > center)? |
| jyazelz@peoplepc.com | 26 May 2008 02:28 |
>It is a long shot but some of the symptoms you are describing are >Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy. Many doctors don't find it because it is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >diagnosis. > ======================= Does Fuchs's appear to be similar to a mass of blood (or similar material) in that when the eye is not very active it spreads across the vision to simulate a very thin covering and when the eye is active it coalesces into a blob that may cover 50 percent of the field of view (sitting in the center)?
|
| ray | 25 May 2008 02:54 |
It is a long shot but some of the symptoms you are describing are Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy. Many doctors don't find it because it is rare, but it is easy to diagnose if they are looking for it. I found that I have it about 2 months ago. It only took 3 different doctors to find it, some have gone to 6 or more before they got a proper diagnosis.
>Did they check you for cataract? Your desription sounds like it, but of >course it could be something else. Only a physical examination by a [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >> >>I am going to see an eye surgeon next week who maybe can help me. |
| MsBrainy | 25 May 2008 02:27 |
Did they check you for cataract? Your desription sounds like it, but of course it could be something else. Only a physical examination by a professional can determine your condition.
>I am 65 and my vison in the last two or so years has been getting >worse for reading. I have been buying magnafying reading glass. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >I am going to see an eye surgeon next week who maybe can help me.
 Signature MsBrainy
|
| Jerry | 25 May 2008 00:42 |
I am 65 and my vison in the last two or so years has been getting worse for reading. I have been buying magnafying reading glass.
Now, when I try to read, it is like looking through glasses that are smeered with vasaline. I had my vision checked and got perscription reading glasses. There is absolutely no difference and I still cannot focus to read. My distance vison is failing too.
Reading through various web sites and Usenet Groups, I have concluded that there so may different possible vision problems that I could never determine what my problem is over the Internet.
My problem is complicated by my living in Panama. I went to who I thought was an opthomologist but he was an optometrist. ( There is a language barrier since my Spanish is not perfect.) I told him that I did not think prescription glasses would solve my problem but I went ahead and had them made anyway.
I am going to see an eye surgeon next week who maybe can help me.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|