You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: PRK healing time?
| Neil Brooks | 24 May 2008 13:38 |
> A real treatment should not require one to heal at all.
> "PRIMUM, NON NUOCERE"
> FIRST, DO NO HARM.
Of course, you have no idea what you're talking about, and dragging
out Latin does nothing to change that (though the parallel between a
"dead language" and all the dead theories you dredge up IS cute).
My wife's myopia was perfectly fixed with PRK.
No harm, no foul.
But then ... her myopia didn't progress in at all the way Otis Brown
thought it should, either, so ....
Maybe she simply didn't believe in tortured statistics and turn-of-the-
century fiction books.
|
| Zetsu | 24 May 2008 13:02 |
A real treatment should not require one to heal at all.
"PRIMUM, NON NUOCERE"
FIRST, DO NO HARM.
|
| spammer | 24 May 2008 02:06 |
Not easy to pin down. Everyone heals differently and at different
rates. With PRK, the healing time is generally a few months with some
visual fluctuations during that time.
Best of luck, and enjoy your "new vision".
|
| Paula Sims | 23 May 2008 21:39 |
Hello all,
I was told that my doctor would do PRK on me and was told about the
"longer" healing times. Yes, YMMV, but for someone with a -3 and -3.75,
what would you guess the healing time "should" be?
Thanks
Paula
|
Quick links:
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage