You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Comparison of laser vs non-laser glaucoma treatment?
| Don W | 15 May 2008 17:49 |
I have a non-surgery bias. Just how unstable is the IOP? And could other eye drops not using BAK be tried? I am a Xalatan user and "side effects" don't seem to be a problem. Uses BAK as I understand. What effects are you having?
Don W.
>I am having unstable IOP. In addition,the preservative BAK in my eye > drops appear to be giving me trouble. I finally decided that [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Bill |
| Salmon Egg | 15 May 2008 05:34 |
I am having unstable IOP. In addition,the preservative BAK in my eye drops appear to be giving me trouble. I finally decided that surgery,trabeculectomy is the way to go. My left eye suffers severe reduction of central vision because of a central retinal vein occlusion. The trabeculectomy is to be done on my "good" rightey to preserve its central vision. Needless to say, this makes me nervous.
I was surprised to find out that the surgery is planned to be true cutting rather than laser based. I was under the impression--perhaps incorrectly--that laser treatment avoided much of the risk associated with actual cutting. Where can I get a good comparison of the pros and cons of laser surgery as opposed to scalpel surgery? I want to be armed with knowledge when I ask more questions.
Bill
|
Quick links: