You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Computer displays that correct vision possible?
| Boxman | 08 May 2008 22:51 |
> Holograms are all about reproducing an effect caused by stereoscopic > vision - which needs two eyes. They make parts of the image appear nearer or > further away by presenting each eye with a different image. If you only have > one eye you can't see the 3D effect. Perhaps a bit nit-picky, but holograms aren't a "stereoscopic effect" in the sense that you purposely send two different images to each eye. Holograms reproduce the original wavefront that came from the object that the hologram was made from. If you have one eye, theoreticially you will still perceive similar depth in the hologram as you would viewing a real scene with one eye. Obviously with 2 eyes you have greater depth perception and the depth observed in the hologram will appear accordingly.
In regards to the topic of trying to create a hologram that is "out of focus" for normal viewing but in focus for an uncorrected nearsighted person for example, this is only possible if you know ahead of time the distortion that your eye adds to the wavefront entering the eye and then somehow perturbing the hologram to create a distorted wavefront that when passed through the nearsighted eye creates the proper wavefront at the eye. I know of no mechanism available during the recording of a hologram that would be able to create such a distortion.
It is probably feasible to calculate and then create a computer generated hologram that would distort the wavefront coming from a monitor such that when it entered your uncorrected eye the image appeared focus. I think a practical problem is that you would lose a significant amount of brightness because hologram diffraction efficiencies are usually low (meaning a lot of light will get thrown out of the "main beam" and not enter your eye). It also may only work over a small angle, meaning it would only appear in focus straight on and a few degrees to the left/right of straight on.
|
| CWatters | 08 May 2008 18:13 |
> On May 3, 9:59 am, "CWatters" > <colin.watt...@NOturnersoakSPAM.plus.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Mark L. Fergerson Nope. It means you have a problem focusing on distant objects. It doesn't mean obects appear to you to be at the wrong distance. Important difference.
Holograms are all about reproducing an effect caused by stereoscopic vision - which needs two eyes. They make parts of the image appear nearer or further away by presenting each eye with a different image. If you only have one eye you can't see the 3D effect.
Aside: If you only have one ey you can see _a_ 3D effect if you move your head or the hologram but that's a different 3D effect. In that case you are seeing something more akin to a sequence of 2D images.
|
| nuny@bid.nes | 05 May 2008 03:10 |
On May 3, 9:59 am, "CWatters" <colin.watt...@NOturnersoakSPAM.plus.com> wrote:
> "Amir Michail" <amich...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > things at the wrong distance - so correcting the apparent distance using a > 3D effect doesn't help. Beg pardon? I am "nearsighted". Guess what the term means.
Mark L. Fergerson
|
| CWatters | 03 May 2008 16:59 |
> Imagine using a laptop without having to wear corrective > eyeglasses. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Amir I don't think so... People who need glasses don't have a problem seeing things at the wrong distance - so correcting the apparent distance using a 3D effect doesn't help.
|
| Amir Michail | 03 May 2008 13:34 |
Imagine using a laptop without having to wear corrective eyeglasses.
I know that 3D displays exist that don't require special glasses.
So maybe this is possible as well?
Amir
|
Quick links: