On 1/28/07 11:50 PM, in article 1170057000.658437.227290@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com, "Bucky" <uw_badgers@email.com> wrote:
> I bought a quality pair of polarized sunglasses (Hobie, $60 sale/$160 > retail) for driving purposes, especially to help in daylight rainy > conditions. I read about the theory of polarized light, and thought it > would be a great improvement over regular sunglasses. However, I've a > been quite disappointed in their performance. High quality expensive polarized glasses do not give you significant improvement over any non-distorting polarized glasses. I get mine from the 99¢ store when I can.
> Whenever I came across a situation that I thought should make a > difference (like sun reflecting off a wet road, or drizzling > conditions), I compared the polarized sunglasses vs a non-polarized $5 > sunglasses. I honestly couldn't notice any difference in glare > reduction. These glasses work best when light reflects off a surface at the Brewster angle. The Brewster angle is related to the index of refraction of the reflecting/scattering surface. Yes, black asphalt does indeed have a refractive index. Technically, absorbing surfaces have what is called a complex refractive index. At the Brewster angle, only light with its electrical field parallel to the surface gets reflected and that is almost totally removed by the polarizer. Away from the Brewster angle, some vertically oriented light will get through.
As the sun rises and falls from dawn to dusk, the angle of reflection changes. Depending on the time of the year and time of the day, you may actually get reflection at the Brewster angle.
I found such glasses very useful for fly fishing. At times, it make small flies highly visible against the glare reflected off of the water. Toward dawn or dusk, the glare suppression is greatly reduced and getting the extra light by not using the polarizing glasses often gave better seeing even with the glare.
> On the other hand, polarized lenses had some negative effects. LCD > displays (radio, odometer) have a disconcerting shimmer (because my L > and R eyes see different brightness due to their different angles). > When I looking at other cars' windshields, I see a disconcerting > effect of a grid of spots (possibly due to safety glass?) And I can > barely see a rainbow! =) On my Toyota, the polarization state of the odometer was exactly incorrectly. It would cost no more to do it correctly for new models.
The spots you see arise from the stress in the windshield. Light gets partially polarized when scattered in the atmosphere. The blue sky, scattered by aerosols and air molecules is partially polarized. This scattered light's polarization state gets modified going through the stressed glass and adhesive. As a consequence light is absorbed in the polarizer as a function of windshield stress.
> What are other people's experiences with polarized sunglasses? They'd > probably be really great if you're at the beach or on the water, but > for land and driving use, I think I'll get non-polarized next time. Actually, I find polarized glasses useful for driving into glare, but the cannot be relied upon to give good performance all the time. You may notice mirages that look like water in the road at dips. Polarized glasses help get rid of that.
> http://www.hobiepolarized.com/eyewear.aspx Bill -- Fermez le Bush--about two years to go.
|