Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: why are prescriptions required for eyes?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: why are prescriptions required for eyes?

Dan Abel27 Jan 2007 19:11
> >I can see why prescriptions are required for drugs, because those can
> > be easily abused or sold in the black market. But to me, eye
> > prescriptions don't seem that critical.

> But (if you really, really want to) there is always Photoshop.

Never thought of that.  We had a mandated financial report at work that
was needed Right Now.  It was a yearly report.  The software had a bug
in it, and the numbers simply didn't add up.  It was one page.  The
accounting folks knew what the numbers were supposed to be.  I suggested
to the Little Cheese that I just edit the print file and fix it.  I told
her it would take two hours, a few seconds to do the edit and the rest
to figure out how to make it editable and then convert it back to a
print file.  The Big Cheese came by and asked what the problem was.  He
said my solution was ridiculous.  Just import into Excel, or retype it.  
Å clerical person could do that, you didn't need a computer programmer.

Mark A27 Jan 2007 04:30
>I can see why prescriptions are required for drugs, because those can
> be easily abused or sold in the black market. But to me, eye
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> go see the optometrist (just like you'd see a podiatrist if shoes were
> giving you problems).

If you agree that everyone should get an initial refraction done
professionally, how are your going to enforce only allowing someone to only
make an minor adjustment to the initial Rx? Either all refractions have be
done by a licensed OD/MD, or none of them would have to be.

One could argue about how long a refraction should be valid for before it
expires, and in some states a Rx for contacts expires one year after the
exam date, and in other states it is two years or longer. But expiration of
a professionally done refraction is different than coming up with a new Rx
on your own.

But (if you really, really want to) there is always Photoshop.

Bucky26 Jan 2007 19:08
I can see why prescriptions are required for drugs, because those can
be easily abused or sold in the black market. But to me, eye
prescriptions don't seem that critical.

My analogy is shoes. You could probably mess up your
feet/knees/legs/back by wearing the wrong size or type of shoes, or
improper inserts long term. Yet a shoe prescription from a podiatrist
is not required for people to buy shoes.

Of course, everyone should get an initial refraction done
professionally. But what's wrong with buying disposable contacts that
are a little higher or lower than your prescription to see how they
perform? You're not going to be seriously injured. Maybe get some
headaches or eyestrain, that's all. And if you do have problems, then
go see the optometrist (just like you'd see a podiatrist if shoes were
giving you problems).

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.