You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: correcting spherical without cylinder
| William Stacy | 21 Dec 2006 22:21 |
You've gotten 2 bizarre answers, probably more to come. Assuming the Rx is indeed a CLRx (not a spectacle Rx that is "OK for contacts" type), you can get the -11 (no more, and I'm amazed to see who suggested that little tidbit), and then have the resudual measured while you are wearing the contacts for the over-wear glasses. The other "Dr." is just wrong. 1.25 cyls just don't disappear, and the idea of ignoring it is a bad one, if you're interested in sharp vision.
w.stacy, o.d.
>I'm probably using the wrong terms, but hopefully you'll get my point. >If I have a contacts prescription of -11 sph, -1.25 cyl. What would [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > |
| Bucky | 21 Dec 2006 21:29 |
I'm probably using the wrong terms, but hopefully you'll get my point. If I have a contacts prescription of -11 sph, -1.25 cyl. What would happen if I wore spherical contacts -11 and left the astigmatism uncorrected? What would my "equivalent" vision be like?
The reason I'm asking is because they do not make disposable contacts with my prescription, only custom-made torics. But they do have spherical disposables at the same power. I'm just wondering if I could see decently (everything except reading and driving) without correcting astigmatism.
|
Quick links: