You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Varilux Physio vs Varilux Physio360
| Robert Martellaro | 22 Nov 2006 17:04 |
>Could someone please explain the difference between the Physio and >Physio360. I've been to > Varilux.Com, but they are far from clear on the target market of >either product. The 360 uses free-form technology, surfacing the add power on the back of the lens instead molded on the front surface. You won't see too much difference in the designs unless you need a high add (above +2.00) or are very astigmatic (above +2.50).
Robert Martellaro ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Optician/Owner Roberts Optical Wauwatosa, Wi. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." - Richard Feynman
|
| g_mail@spamex.com | 19 Nov 2006 03:17 |
Could someone please explain the difference between the Physio and Physio360. I've been to Varilux.Com, but they are far from clear on the target market of either product.
I know the following question has been asked and answered in many posts, but I am getting ready to make a purchase and just want to be sure (the retailers tell me the opposite of what I read here)...
For a light prescription using a Varilux lens and a regular metal frame, I am better off getting a standard plastic lens as opposed to a polycarb lens... is that generally correct?
Thanks
Tom
|
Quick links: