Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: Varilux Physio vs Varilux Physio360

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Varilux Physio vs Varilux Physio360

CatmanX27 Jan 2007 19:39
The Ipseo was never moulded. It was laser generated front and back
from day 1. That was the reason to test head/eye movement so as to
vary the reading band accordingly.

You americans are very funny then if you get a generated physio as
they are  diamond cut on the rear surface everywhere else to account
for the aberrations of a given prescription. You can't get that from a
generator, thus nullifying any benefit of the lens.

grant

Robert Martellaro24 Jan 2007 19:32
>Robert, the 360 is freeform on both surfaces, the Physio on the back
>only. The MF is purely front surface on both, but the aberration
>profile is better controlled over both surfaces on the 360.
>
>grant

Grant,

Sorry, I lost track of this thread, probably the holidays.

In the U.S., and this may not be true in Europe, Asia, and Australia, the Physio
is a traditional PAL with the progressivity molded on the front, using standard
generators to grind the Rx on the back. The Physio 360 has the same front design
but is direct surfaced on the back with free-form generators. The Ipseo started
out as a double sided direct surfaced lens but is now done on one surface only,
but I don't know which surface has the progressive.

Regards,

Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
Wauwatosa Wi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman

CatmanX23 Dec 2006 23:21
Robert, the 360 is freeform on both surfaces, the Physio on the back
only. The MF is purely front surface on both, but the aberration
profile is better controlled over both surfaces on the 360.

grant

Robert Martellaro18 Dec 2006 18:03
>>Could someone please explain the difference between the Physio and
>>Physio360.  I've been to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>The 360 uses free-form technology, surfacing the add power on the back of the
>lens instead molded on the front surface.

Correction- the progressive is molded on the front surface and uses free-form
technology to create the back surface.

Robert

Robert Martellaro22 Nov 2006 17:04
>Could someone please explain the difference between the Physio and
>Physio360.  I've been to
>  Varilux.Com, but they are far from clear on the target market of
>either product.

The 360 uses free-form technology, surfacing the add power on the back of the
lens instead molded on the front surface. You won't see too much difference in
the designs unless you need a high add (above +2.00) or are very astigmatic
(above +2.50).


Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
Wauwatosa, Wi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
 - Richard Feynman

g_mail@spamex.com19 Nov 2006 03:17
Could someone please explain the difference between the Physio and
Physio360.  I've been to
 Varilux.Com, but they are far from clear on the target market of
either product.

 I know the following question has been asked and answered in many
posts, but I am getting ready to
 make a purchase and just want to be sure (the retailers tell me the
opposite of what I read here)...

 For a light prescription using a Varilux lens and a regular metal
frame, I am better off getting
 a standard plastic lens as opposed to a polycarb lens...  is that
generally correct?

 
 Thanks

  Tom

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.