Re: Multipurpose Solutions?
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Multipurpose Solutions?
| Scott Seidman | 20 Jul 2006 19:02 |
"Quick" <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in news:f9Qvg.51974$VE1.4533 @newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:
> Duped? I think it's more that the market wants, and is willing > to pay for, convenience. For years, the pharmaceutical industry has been doing all it can to keep generics from reaching the market, going to the extremes of paying the producers of generic drugs to get exclusive rights to a drug with expiring patents, and then not make it (and this is no conspiracy theory!). Also, drugs with very subtle differences from low priced generics (i.e., no great improvements) are marketed direct-to-consumer as the latest greatest thing, when the previous generation of generic would serve the patient just as well.
It seems to be clearly in the interest of the lens makers to get their customers to buy their most expensive products.
 Signature Scott Reverse name to reply
|
| Quick | 20 Jul 2006 18:43 |
> Part of my complaint about the lens industry is that > people have allowed themselves to be duped into thinking [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > masses were duped, the options disappear for the rest of > us. Duped? I think it's more that the market wants, and is willing to pay for, convenience. The manufacturers generally respond to the market -- unless you subscribe to some sort of conspiracy theory. If you're not in the main stream you will pay more or not have the option at all. For "cheap" solutions you need to talk to Dicky (I'd keep a doc on retainer though).
-Quick
|
| 1978fx@gmail.com | 20 Jul 2006 15:32 |
> You can pay $60/year for contacts and $250/yr for care solutions or > > You can pay $60/year for care solutions and $250/yr for contacts. Well, I was either doing something dangerously wrong, or was incredibly lucky, because I figure my solutions costs to be only about $50-75 a year, with the annual-replacement lenses. And I don't think I was doing anything wrong, because my lenses would be GOOD and my eyes okay at the end of a year of cleaning with my method.
Part of my complaint about the lens industry is that people have allowed themselves to be duped into thinking they HAVE to pay this much, either for lenses or for solutions, when it is possible, with care and research, to wear lenses safely for much less $$. But, because the masses were duped, the options disappear for the rest of us.
|
| Dr Judy | 19 Jul 2006 20:07 |
> I snip
> I have the added problem of preferring to pay $60 a year for my lenses, > rather than the $250 the disposables would cost me. You can pay $60/year for contacts and $250/yr for care solutions or
You can pay $60/year for care solutions and $250/yr for contacts.
Dr Judy
> If anyone with this problem HAS found a multi-purposes that doesn't > "goop up" your eyes, please let us know! |
| 1978fx@gmail.com | 19 Jul 2006 17:51 |
I also have that problem, and am glad to see I'm not alone. I haven't tested as many as you did, but it was because I figured that none of these "multi-purpose" (or, in my case, NO purpose) solutions were for me.
I recently posted about the recent apparent drop of Aosept from the market (along with generic pork-based enzymatic tablets). My eye doc says it's market forces (too many contact wearers too lazy to clean their lenses, so everything's disposable, so people don't need the thorough cleanings we're used to). Unfortunately, that seems to leave people like you and me screwed, as we can't use those solutions, for some reason.
I have the added problem of preferring to pay $60 a year for my lenses, rather than the $250 the disposables would cost me.
If anyone with this problem HAS found a multi-purposes that doesn't "goop up" your eyes, please let us know!
|
| PPT33R | 19 Jul 2006 16:52 |
I have used AOSept for decades. The stuff works, but I do consider it expensive and a pain in the a.s to use as part of a multi-step contact lens maintenance regimen.
Recently, AOSept has been impossible to obtain, forcing me to "test" other methods. I figured it was time to give multipurpose solutions a try.
I tried Aquify, ReNu, Opti-Free, and Complete Moisture Plus. I found none of them allowed me to wear my contacts comfortably through an entire day of activity. I have no clue why.
I tried "Clear Care" two years ago, but had similar results to the multipurpose solutions I recently tested.
I find with the multipurpose solutions, by the end of the day my vision becomes very blurry. I believe this is due to build-up on the lenses, because when I put my glasses back on I am fine. Sometimes this 'end of the day' buildup makes my lenses downright uncomfortable. After soaking the lenses overnight, they are pretty much back to 'normal' the next day.
I found the Aquify product was the most comfortable, followed by the Complete. But I had to remove my contacts a good 4 hours earlier with all of them than my experience with AOSept due to deteriorating vision quality. I also notice when I wake up in the morning I have a significant amount of 'debris' or 'yellowish sleep eye deposits' on my lashes that do not exist when I use AOSept.
I tried to follow the directions as indicated for each product. I added an additional cleaning step using MiraFlow or equivalent, and an extra rinse with saline before inserting. I get the same result every time. Towards the end of the day my contacts are very blurry.
Am I doing something wrong? With the popularity of multipurpose solutions, is anyone else having this problem? Is there some secret trick or other product that might help, or should I just go back to the hassle of AOSept now that it is appearing back on the shelves?
TIA
|
Quick links:
|
|
|