Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: polycarb vs 1.67 for weak prescription

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: polycarb vs 1.67 for weak prescription

William Stacy23 Jun 2006 21:21
Not sure if I missed it, but someone should recommend a Trivex ECP by
hoya.  It's a great, thin, strong, light lens with little aberration.  I
wear them myself and love them.

w.stacy, o.d.

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
>  

Quick23 Jun 2006 21:06
> Buddy, you are an idiot.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Quick, stick with the physio 360, multicoated and choose
> the material you are happy with.\

I've decided on the Physio 360 (over the Physio).
I have decided on the Air Titanium drill mount frames.
I don't know what "Airware" is.... Is that another term for
polycarb?

I'm not sure what lens material will make me happiest :)
The viable alternatives are polycarb and 1.67

I have no qualms about the extra money if there
is any advantage at all to the 1.67 over polycarb
given my Rx.

For all I know polycarb might be better than
the 1.67 given my Rx.

I have no idea if the materials effect the transitions
performance differently.

At the moment it sounds like I'm going with the 1.67

thanks,
-Quick

CatmanX23 Jun 2006 12:08
Buddy, you are an idiot.

Physio 360m is a much better lens. Pay the $20.00 and be happy it was
well invested.

Airwear is fine for lower scripts. Chromatic aberration is
inconsequential at these scripts. The benefit of 1.67 is it is
virtually unbreakable - more so than airwear. Airwear is cheaper and
great for rimless fits.

Quick, stick with the physio 360, multicoated and choose the material
you are happy with.\

dr grant

Mark A23 Jun 2006 09:08
"Quick" <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:q5Omg.49044
> I don't think that's an option. I think the Physio 360 is only
> offered in polycarb, 1.67, and they just added CR-30 which
> has been recommended against due to the drill mounts.
>
> thanks,
> -Quick

You are correct that 1.60 is not available for Varilux Physio 360. Therefore
I would strongly consider the Varilux Panamic which is available in 1.60.

Quick23 Jun 2006 09:01
>> Ok, Doc is really advising against CR-30 and recommends
>> polycarb, or as an alternative 1.67, 'cause I'm getting
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> chromatic aberration. 1.67 is overkill for you. I would
> go with 1.60 at the most.

I don't think that's an option. I think the Physio 360 is only
offered in polycarb, 1.67, and they just added CR-30 which
has been recommended against due to the drill mounts.

thanks,
-Quick

Mark A23 Jun 2006 08:28
> Ok, Doc is really advising against CR-30 and recommends
> polycarb, or as an alternative 1.67, 'cause I'm getting drill
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -Quick

Polycarb has the worst chromatic aberration of any commercially available
lens material (measured by abbe value) regardless of index. Avoid it like
the plague.

Except for polycarb, the higher the index, the worse the chromatic
aberration. 1.67 is overkill for you. I would go with 1.60 at the most.

Quick23 Jun 2006 05:28
Ok, Doc is really advising against CR-30 and recommends
polycarb, or as an alternative 1.67, 'cause I'm getting drill
mounts. Air Titanium rimless.

O.D. +1.25 sph add +2.25
O.S. +0.75 -0.25 add +2.25

Physio 360
Crizal Alize with Clear Guard (gold)
Transitions (grey)

Yea, I know, I don't need the 360... it's only $20 more.
I don't play Jai Lai

So...
I don't expect the difference in thinness to be measurable.
I don't expect the difference in weight to be noticeable.

Is there any possibility I could see any material caused
abberations with either (I'm very sensitive to that sort of
thing)?
Would there be any difference with the transitions
performance?

Price difference is about 10% of total so not a factor
if there is any advantage to the 1.67

-Quick

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.