Re: Timolol vs Istalol
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Timolol vs Istalol
| Anon E. Muss | 22 Jun 2006 14:20 |
[snip]
>BTW, timolol can often be used once a day and do just fine. It depends on >the individual case. Timolol does not "wear off" in 12 hours, it actually >taks more than a few days. Full washout is up to 2 weeks, I am told. Yes, >some cases do need twice a day dosing for maximal effect. In fact, many of >us have a large number of patients taking regular timolol (not Timoptic-XE) >just once a day. As mentioned above, this also leads to better compliance. The same is true of BETAGAN (levobunolol) which has an even longer half life than timolol. And I realize that a lot of other eye doctors are prescribing it on a qd basis. I am also aware this happens a lot in managed care situations such as HMOs where there is huge pressure to keep costs down because of the cost difference between generic timoptic and TIMOPTIC-XE.
I *personally* don't trust that once a day regular timoptic or levobunolol will keep the IOP down consistently over the full 24 hours. It may or it may not, and patients/myself don't like performing diurnal/serial IOP checks over a 24 hour period confirm/deny this.
So for the times when an once-a-day dosage of a topical beta blocker is prescribed by me for my glaucoma patients, it is always a drug that has FDA approval for qd dosage, such as TIMOPTIC-XE.
|
| David Robins, MD | 22 Jun 2006 04:26 |
On 6/21/06 10:34 AM, in article qvui92h16rq6i1mbbgdc2sng8lu4cmd5cn@4ax.com,
>> My eye doc has recommended that I swith from Timolol to Istalol for my >> glaucoma. Problem is that in my drug plan Timolol costs me $3 foe 90 [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > etc. However, it is an extremely imporant risk factor, because it is > the only one that eye doctors can (attempt to) control. BTW, timolol can often be used once a day and do just fine. It depends on the individual case. Timolol does not "wear off" in 12 hours, it actually taks more than a few days. Full washout is up to 2 weeks, I am told. Yes, some cases do need twice a day dosing for maximal effect. In fact, many of us have a large number of patients taking regular timolol (not Timoptic-XE) just once a day. As mentioned above, this also leads to better compliance.
|
| Anon E. Muss | 21 Jun 2006 17:34 |
>My eye doc has recommended that I swith from Timolol to Istalol for my >glaucoma. Problem is that in my drug plan Timolol costs me $3 foe 90 >day supply, and Istalol is $76!!! It's not in their "preferred list". >Is it worth it? Here is what I can generically say, rather than commenting directly on your case in particular:
ISTALOL contains the same medication as timolol. However, it is formulated in a unique way (as TIMOPTIC-XE is) to allow once a day dosing. That is, essentially, the only real difference between timolol and ISTALOL.
IOW, ISTALOL qd is promoted and marketed as providing *the same IOP lowering* as timolol bid provides. But in fact, timolol bid may provide a more steady lowering and blunting of the IOP curve than ISTALOL.
So, in general, timolol bid and ISTALOL qd are interchangable. The reason doctors prescribe ISTALOL (or TIMOPTIC-XE) over standard timolol generally is because a once a day dosage promotes compliance. Most (but not all) of the time, there is no reason why a person *must be* on ISTALOL versus regular timolol.
If cost is a major concern, then I would askl your eye doctor two questions:
1. Why did he switch you from timolol to ISTALOL?
and, depending on the answer here,
2. Tell him cost is a "big deal" and ask him if there is any way he could switch you back to timolol. If not, have him explain why.
>My pressure seems to be under control, consistently about 18 in both >eyes. FYI, one cannot say without knowing your optic nerve status over time whether your glaucoma is/has been "under control" if the IOP is "consistently about 18 in both eyes." And there is no a priori way of knowing whether in the future your glaucoma will not progress at an unacceptable rate if your IOPs are consistently about 18.
It is important to understand that IOP is merely a risk factor for glaucoma, as is thinner CCTs, age, family history of glaucoma, race, etc. However, it is an extremely imporant risk factor, because it is the only one that eye doctors can (attempt to) control.
|
| Jim T. | 21 Jun 2006 14:15 |
My eye doc has recommended that I swith from Timolol to Istalol for my glaucoma. Problem is that in my drug plan Timolol costs me $3 foe 90 day supply, and Istalol is $76!!! It's not in their "preferred list". Is it worth it? My pressure seems to be under control, consistently about 18 in both eyes.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|