Re: Flonase side effects?
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Flonase side effects?
| Murray Grossan | 17 Sep 2005 17:26 |
On 9/16/05 9:58 PM, in article 1126934899.809491@news-1.nethere.net, "MS" <ms@nospam.com> wrote:
> Are you aware that guaifenesin is also still sold as Humibid--much cheaper > than as Mucinex? Not the prescription Humibid L.A., that was supposed to [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] >> >> Violet Thank you for a very learned discussion. Its strange - many of the ENT doctors use guaifenesin and few of the pulmonary doctors do. The mucinex people recently sent out a flyer from some "research" organization. They listed all the good doctors that took part in a round table, suggesting that they were advocating this product, but not saying so in plain words. Then they had lovely drawings and discussions of post nasal drip. Then they gave a case history of the patient who was cured by Mucinex. But in the very small print they noted that she also used irrigation twice a day. Worse, they give legitimate references which I happen to be familiar with, that implies that these authors recommend their product. Frankly this sort of thing really angers me and I wrote to some of the participants in the round table to tell them what is happening.
I often see the most nonsense product, and they list legitimate references as though the articles recommended their product. Buyer beware.
|
| MS | 17 Sep 2005 04:58 |
Are you aware that guaifenesin is also still sold as Humibid--much cheaper than as Mucinex? Not the prescription Humibid L.A., that was supposed to come out again, but never did. (Alas--for me, with a good prescription plan, much cheaper as prescription RX.)
Guaifenesin isn't under patent, only the long-acting formulation of Mucinex is. (And somehow, they were able to convince the government to disallow all other long-acting formulations. So, the Humibid-E (OTC) (they also have a DM version with cough suppressant, E is only guaifenesin), is supposed to last for 8 hours, rather than the 12 hours of Mucinex. Big deal. The tablets have 400mg of guaifenesin each, rather than the 600 mg in Mucinex. So--to get the maximum dose 2400 mg per day of guaifenesin, with Mucinex you take two tablets twice per day, with Humibid-E you take two tablets three times per day. Even considering taking six tablets per day of the Humibid, rather than 4 tablets per day of Mucinex, the Humibid comes out much cheaper. For $20 you get 100 tablets I believe, rather than the 40 tablets of Mucinex for that price. 100 tablets taken six per day, last many more days than 40 tablets taken 4 per day.
A couple days ago tried to find the Humibid-E in the drug store, and couldn;t find any, had to buy Mucinex instead. I hope that the Mucinex folks haven't managed to get Humibid-E banned as well! It certainly was available recently.
Alas--I'm not really sure that guaifenesin works to thin mucus, at least for me. I've taken it on and off for years, including again now, but don't really notice that it helps to thin my extremely thick, sticky mucus at all. (It's always hard to know for sure--"I might be worse if I wasn't taking this", etc.) How many people are really sure that guaifenesin products significantly loosen your mucus? I believe the medical tests on it have actually been quite inconclusive, its efficacy hasn't really been proven.
I understand that in Europe NAC is frequently used as a mucus thinner. I tried that too, the "supplement" version available here, didn't help at all either. I really wish there was a medication that really worked to loosen overly-thick mucus. (Of course irrigation works, the only thing that really does for me, to loosen up and wash out the glue. I have to use a LOT of saline though, to loosen up and wash out the gunk. Not very pleasant, and time-consuming, a few times per day.)
> > Only thing, the companies will change the formula just enough to retain a > > patent somehow, or $$ to the FDA. Look at what happened with the *new* [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Violet |
| Violet | 09 Sep 2005 16:55 |
> Only thing, the companies will change the formula just enough to retain a > patent somehow, or $$ to the FDA. Look at what happened with the *new* > Mucinex... guaifenesin was $8 a hundred, and now it is .50 cents a pill and > more. The FDA freeze out the generics except in foreign markets.... > > ...Allen With the Mucinex being so expensive, I found that ordering them from CVS.com was much cheaper than I can get around Atlanta. I can get a quantity of 40 for close to what I pay for 20 in town.
Violet
|
| Allen L. | 09 Sep 2005 15:31 |
>>> I've used Flonase on a continual basis for the last 5 or 6 years. >>> ...No side-effects, and it works great to help keep my sinuses [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> >> Also, it may still work at reduced dosage.....
>In news:cQfUe.8133$Wd7.7602@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net, >Steven L. <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> typed:
> Has the patent on any brand of steroid spray expired yet? Vancenase > was one of the first and it's been around for at least 10 years, so > maybe a generic form will come along soon. Only thing, the companies will change the formula just enough to retain a patent somehow, or $$ to the FDA. Look at what happened with the *new* Mucinex... guaifenesin was $8 a hundred, and now it is .50 cents a pill and more. The FDA freeze out the generics except in foreign markets. Beconase has been around forever it seems (but no generic here), but still costs a fortune, and even in Mexico it is still is more expensive than Rhinocort. Go figure...
...Allen
|
| Steven L. | 09 Sep 2005 13:09 |
>>I've used Flonase on a continual basis for the last 5 or 6 years. ...No >>side-effects, and it works great to help keep my sinuses clear. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Also, it may still work at reduced dosage..... Has the patent on any brand of steroid spray expired yet? Vancenase was one of the first and it's been around for at least 10 years, so maybe a generic form will come along soon.
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
| Don Brady | 09 Sep 2005 02:58 |
>I've used Flonase on a continual basis for the last 5 or 6 years. ...No >side-effects, and it works great to help keep my sinuses clear. >...However, it is quite expensive. ...Jon For those paying out of theor own pockets, there might be the option of importing from Canada.
Also, it may still work at reduced dosage.....
|
| Johnny1000@webtv.net | 09 Sep 2005 02:08 |
skoczor@sympatico.ca (Steve)
>OK so I went to an allergist and was > diagnosed with being allergic to Cats (which [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > checked the website and it basically says > nothing about it. I've used Flonase on a continual basis for the last 5 or 6 years. ...No side-effects, and it works great to help keep my sinuses clear. ...However, it is quite expensive. ...Jon
|
| Steve | 08 Sep 2005 16:29 |
OK so I went to an allergist and was diagnosed with being allergic to Cats (which was obvious) and mold. Mold is everywhere, especially the stuff they tested for which is what you would find in grass.
I was prescribed Flonase and would like to know what you all think of this drug?
I am also wondering how this drug works, I checked the website and it basically says nothing about it.
Thanks,
Steve
|
Quick links:
|
|
|