You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Opinions on TUMT procedure?
| Chockman | 18 Nov 2005 05:18 |
I am a 62 yr old who had Prostatron 2.5 TUMT July 04. About 1/2 of the prostatic urethra was cleared, but the distal half was still occluded. Had the PVP 2/23/05 because I was still having some feeling just before going to bed that the bladder was not yet empty. Had no retro with the TUMT but did have retro from the PVP due to the need to incise the bladder neck. Would be willing to answer any questions about either procedure. chockman@canby.com
> Hi, I'm a 34-year-old who has been dealing with moderate BPH the past few > years. Tried Flomax and Urotraxal and had bad reactions to them, and after [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > and opinions out there on the Internet on this. I'd like to hear anyone's > experiences if they have them. Thanks! |
| N D | 18 Nov 2005 01:04 |
Hi, I'm a 34-year-old who has been dealing with moderate BPH the past few years. Tried Flomax and Urotraxal and had bad reactions to them, and after conssulting with 2 uros have opted to get trans urethral microwave therapy done in January rather than anything more invasive which I'd like to avoid since I'm pretty young for all this. Long story short, would like to get opinions from anyone that may have had it done. Hard to find real experiences and opinions out there on the Internet on this. I'd like to hear anyone's experiences if they have them. Thanks!
|
Quick links: