Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: Opinions on TUMT procedure?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Opinions on TUMT procedure?

Al20 Nov 2005 15:56
About age - if you had a 5 year old house and the plumbing backed up,
would you think "this house is too new for roto-rooter so I'll live with
it and mop up everyday until it's 20 years older?"

Look up posts to this NG from Patrick starting 4 or 5 years ago.  He was
around your age, had serious BPH and had an unsuccessful microwave
treatment for it.  Several of his Doctors and Urologists did not want to
believe it could be BPH at his age. He finally became an early
participant in clinical trials of PVP.  His results were great and
influenced a few of us on this NG to seek PVP.

Left untreated, BPH can do permanent damage to your bladder and even
kidneys - just like ignoring a plumbing leak can eventually cause rot,
mildew and mold.

I believe that the reason some guys have continuing problems after PVP,
and some other procedures, is because things above the prostate have
become damaged by neglect.  Clearing the passageway cannot restore a
bladder stretched and weakened by years of retention.  Good Doctors
explain what you can reasonably expect, based on the tests and
evaluation they have performed on you, before scheduling surgery.

My advice is to thoroughly evaluate through urodynamic tests,
cystoscophy, blood work, PSA (with biopsy if indicated) what and where
the problem really is.  If you indeed have BPH - fix it.  I am among
those extremely satisfied and grateful for my PVP - but I would add that
I would rather have a TURP by the best TURP surgeon in the country than
a PVP by the worst PVP surgeon.  The skill of my surgeon fixed my BPH.

Al
PVP Dec 2003, Dr Te

> Hi, I'm a 34-year-old who has been dealing with moderate BPH the past few
> years. Tried Flomax and Urotraxal and had bad reactions to them, and after
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> and opinions out there on the Internet on this. I'd like to hear anyone's
> experiences if they have them. Thanks!

N D18 Nov 2005 01:04
Hi, I'm a 34-year-old who has been dealing with moderate BPH the past few
years. Tried Flomax and Urotraxal and had bad reactions to them, and after
conssulting with 2 uros have opted to get trans urethral microwave therapy
done in January rather than anything more invasive which I'd like to avoid
since I'm pretty young for all this. Long story short, would like to get
opinions from anyone that may have had it done. Hard to find real experiences
and opinions out there on the Internet on this. I'd like to hear anyone's
experiences if they have them. Thanks!

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.