Re: Uro opts for TURP over PVP??
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Uro opts for TURP over PVP??
| BB | 15 Nov 2005 07:11 |
>Hello all >(I posted this as a reply further up the list, but go no comments). [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > >-- CC I had a TURP about three months ago. My URO told me the same thing, that TURP is the gold standard, the procedure he preferred in my case. I didn't have cancer, but my prostate was very large, requiring me to self-catheterize 2-3 times a day. I had been retaining 900-1,000 ml of urine according to bladder scans taken on several occasions. He said that PVP is more likely to allow reoccurrence of blockage in a shorter time, especially when a large amount of tissue must be removed. He removed about 30 g. of tissue which was cancer free. At 55 years of age, he told me I had the prostate of a 70 year-old. I spent two relatively pain-free days in the hospital, and I'm doing very well 3 months later. No incontinence, a stronger stream than when I was 16, but do have retrograde ejaculation, as he predicted before the surgery, although it has not affected the quality of sensation during intercourse. Best of luck to you.
|
| Clarence Crow | 11 Nov 2005 21:48 |
Hello all (I posted this as a reply further up the list, but go no comments).
I, too, have urinary problems inherited from HDR Brachytherapy for advanced Prostate Cancer, performed in mid July this year. I had to wear a Foley Catheter for almost 4 wks post discharge from hospital. I'm on 1Flomax/day and still have probs voiding, from zero at night (Nocturia) to about 80% at high noon, plus retain approx 250ml on a post void Bladder scan.
Going into the HDRB, my prostate was 65cc and had previously had some "easing" done 16 yrs ago by a General Surgeon. So, in essence, I got Prostate Cancer on top of an old BPH complaint.
Just yesterday, I saw the Uro who did the HDRB implant and discussed either another TURP or PVP. He opted for the TURP as he said it was more reliable, the Gold Standard, easier to remove the correct amount of tissue, and there were some problems showing up from the newer Laser treatments.
Anyway, he won't do a thing until he has a look at another Cystoscopy he scheduled for me in a few wks time. He did comment that any re-sectioning would need to possibly wait another 3 months for the tissue damaged by the HDRB to re-stabilize.
I'm not too confident on any of these things, but will have to "bite the bullet" eventually dependent on his opinion/s....
Anyone else in here with a similar story?
PS: I do post more regularly in alt.support.cancer.prostate
-- Reader to complete... -- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:
-- Regards
-- CC
|
Quick links:
|
|
|