You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Any bad PVP experiences?
| Rich256 | 07 Oct 2005 01:56 |
> Rich256, I have read your posts since March 05. I had TUMT in June 04 with > catheter for one week but the result dimished within a couple of months. If [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Derek, may you have a pleasant visit to your uro today. I really don't think there was anything really bad about TUMT. I sure would recommend it before trying TURP. Except for having a few sharp pains the procedure was pretty uneventful. And fortunately the woman who did most of the procedure called the night before and filled me in on all possible pains I might experience. She said of the 500 procedures they have performed 80% said they would do it again and only 2 said they would never do it again.
One friend of mine is avoiding PVP because of his experiences with anesthesia. It almost killed him.
I keep my eye on here to see what the responses are. I don't plan on doing anything more until next year. I won't know now until next March if I am having any retention. Flomax really hit me with everything it has. I took it for less than a month.
Age 76 here so have lots of time to check these groups. It wasn't until I got here that I found out about PVP. The previous URO only suggested TUMT or TURP. Apparently his hospital does not have the equipment. The new URO is about 10 miles instead of 1.
Seems that some with PVP did not get a lot better results. A ultrasound three months after the TUMT indicated very little retention. It seems to me that the peak improvement came in about two or three weeks.
|
| Pat C | 07 Oct 2005 00:44 |
Rich256, I have read your posts since March 05. I had TUMT in June 04 with catheter for one week but the result dimished within a couple of months. If I found this NG earlier, I would not waste health, time and money for TUMT. I had my pvp 7 weeks ago and everything is fine till now, no pain but gain. I do have retro prior to pvp because I had Flomax for 3.5 years as well as proscar for 1.5 years.
Derek, may you have a pleasant visit to your uro today.
|
| Derek F | 06 Oct 2005 22:25 |
> Derek, I am at week 7 post PVP. Does your uro ask you to take Avodart or > Proscar after pvp? Mine did but I decide not to bacause I rather to have [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > it is the problem of "gravity". During the day I pass only 120-250 ml each > time. I am very satisfied with PVP. No he did not suggest Avodart or Proscar as I had told him of my bad reactions to it. I am sure that he does not recommend it to others either. Some Uro's here in the UK put patients on to it in the month prior to the procedure if they are not already on it. During the day I pass around 300ml at a time but I always go to the toilet before going out when not really needing and then only pass around 125ml. Same applies when about to make the journey home. My Qmax Flow rate prior to PVP was 11.7 mls sec. I am very sure that I cannot compete with your present flow. Derek.
|
| Pat C | 06 Oct 2005 21:14 |
Derek, I am at week 7 post PVP. Does your uro ask you to take Avodart or Proscar after pvp? Mine did but I decide not to bacause I rather to have another PVP after years than having side effect of taking Avodart. My peak flow is 35 ml/s vs <<5 ml/s. Prior to pvp, I got up 0-1time per night with very weak flow and low volume but now after pvp it becomes 1-2 times per night with very strong flow and around 300-400ml each. I think it is the problem of "gravity". During the day I pass only 120-250 ml each time. I am very satisfied with PVP.
|
| Derek F | 05 Oct 2005 21:59 |
>I had green laser about 1 1/2 years ago. For me, it was not as great as > made out to be. I probably should have heeded another doc's advise to use [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > up > or it is not uncommon for this procedure. I am at week 13 post PVP. I stopped passing any blood in my urine after three weeks and only had one bit that could be regarded as a clot. I had no sign of scabs but little bread crumb pieces are sometimes passed, including one yesterday. I have not had any blood in my ejaculation, I think that you should get that checked out as a matter of urgency. I am going for my first check up on Friday and await with interest to see what my flow rate and retention will be. My stream is not a great as I expected and I have get up two or three times in the night compared to 3/5 times before the procedure. My night time problem seems be nocturia and not to be connected to the PVP and the volumes I pass each time during the night (500ml) are more than during the day. Derek.
|
| CJ | 05 Oct 2005 13:46 |
I had green laser about 1 1/2 years ago. For me, it was not as great as made out to be. I probably should have heeded another doc's advise to use the "gold standard" which was TURP. For me, it wasn't simply a 2 - 4 week recovery. I am still experiencing abnormal things, however, a lot has improved over the 1 1/2 years. Urine flow is much stronger and I only get up twice a night to go. My greatest problem is after ejaculation, when I urinate, a lot a blood comes out, even in clumps. Either my doc screwed up or it is not uncommon for this procedure.
|
| Rich256 | 20 Sep 2005 22:53 |
I have been following this group for quite a while. PVP is continuously praised. I just wonder if anyone has had or has heard of any bad experiences. One post said something to that effect but did not give any details.
Others report good results with TURP but a few have with what might be called horror stories.
|
Quick links: