You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: pharmacist shortage
| James Pinkerton | 06 Oct 2003 14:41 |
> I respectfully disagree. If almost 2/3 of the pharmacy graduates were NOT > women we would have an even greater shortage of pharmacists. It seems that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > (3) poor working conditions - no breaks or lunch most places (4) too much > job stress (5) too heavy an RX load due to pharmacist shortage, etc. Compare pharmacy to other professions. Yes you can always get a job (somewhere that is) and pharmacy is well suited as a part-time job. I worked both retail and hospital pharmacy. I worked eighteen years in a hospital. As far as retail pharmacy goes the working conditions are bad. First unless the store is real busy they will not hire you anyway. Any place that I worked in retail I was always constantly busy and I was darn lucky to get caught up. There was no scheduled lunch time or breaks. Usually there was no time off from work. If you missed a day due to sickness, you had to make up the hours.
Then the pharmacy schools go about creating two classes of pharmacists. The regular working all hours and weekends pill counting guys and a clinical pharmacist who only wants to do "professional work" like advising physicians.
I read that today the average pharmacist spends one-third of his/her time just doing paperwork and calling insurance companies. In a profession like medicine or law clerks are hired to do the paperwork. When lunch time arrives, the doctor or lawyer just takes off and goes out to eat. That is really a lot better than trying to count pills with one hand and handle greasy chicken with the other! There should not be a lot of job stress in pharmacy but there is because of the lack of help and organization. Its not like we are actors in the TV show ER where we are busy doing CPR. We are basically taking the medicine out of stock bottles and putting them into smaller labeled containers. The counseling part of our job isn't done very well as we are too busy doing all the manual dispensing ourselves and don't have time to spend with our patients.
|
| Randy Rostie | 06 Oct 2003 12:39 |
I respectfully disagree. If almost 2/3 of the pharmacy graduates were NOT women we would have an even greater shortage of pharmacists. It seems that more men are being counseled to go into other fields. The pharmacist shortage is due to several factors: (1) lack of pharmacy school space (2) burn-out of current pharmacists (3) poor working conditions - no breaks or lunch most places (4) too much job stress (5) too heavy an RX load due to pharmacist shortage, etc.
How many of you REALLY recommend pharmacy as a career choice today with all that is going on in the industry?
> >A brief item in the latest issue of "Pharmacy Times" said that the > >pharmacist shortage continues unabated. The article estimated that, for [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Dave |
| David St. | 06 Oct 2003 02:30 |
>A brief item in the latest issue of "Pharmacy Times" said that the >pharmacist shortage continues unabated. The article estimated that, for [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > ---Franz Kafka Pau
Almost 2/3 of current graduates are female. The majority of Pharmacists work in retail, they don't seem to care for it very much. I have noticed that women who dislike their field of endeavor often choose to retire or work part time when and if they have children. There is the possiblity that this could be a major factor in the Pharmacist shortage.
Dave
|
| Paul Trusten | 06 Oct 2003 01:18 |
A brief item in the latest issue of "Pharmacy Times" said that the pharmacist shortage continues unabated. The article estimated that, for example, the US chain drug industry is short 5500 pharmacists. The cause, it was suggested, is the lenghtening of the pharmacy program by one academic year to make the Pharm.D. degree.
What else is contributing to the shortage, and to what degree do you think it is? Lack of secondary school training, interest, and/or ability in science? Tuition costs? I know that there was a Congressional study on the issue in the late 1990s, but I'd like to hear from the field. What do you think?
Paul Trusten, R.Ph. 3609 Caldera Boulevard Apartment 122 Midland TX 79707-2872 USA 432-694-6208 ptrusten@cox.net
"There are two cardinal sins, from which all the others spring: impatience and laziness."
---Franz Kafka
|
Quick links: