Re: pharmacist shortage
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: pharmacist shortage
| rxempress | 06 Oct 2003 17:04 |
Pharmacy is a calling.
A lot of people begin pharmacy school to make a lot of money once they are out of school. However once they experience the retail world experience a lot of them decide that this is not for them.
Pharmacy has certainly gone downhill in the past 25 years. When I was doing my internship there were hardly any 3rd party payers. Patients submitted their receipts to the insurance company and they were reimbursed. It meant some extra work on the pharmacists' parts because we had to help them complete their forms (i.e. NDC numbers... name of manufacturer... price paid etc).
We actually loved 3rd party cards because in the end there was a lot less work for us. We could set the paper claims aside and fill them in during "downtimes" . Usually all the medications were covered. Reimbursement rates were profitable. The problem was that there was no way of telling if the patient really had coverage. We got stuck on a lot of those.
When the"black box" version of pharmacy billing came into effected (late 80's early 90s) that risk was removed. You filled the prescription... the insurance information went into a "black box" (usually a phone line) ... the patients' coverage was verified and a copay popped out. Wow... what a improvement. Our job suddenly got easier.
Then one day the insurance companies started to play doctor. Formularies, tier level copays, and prior authorizations took hold and suddenly we were begging some little high school graduate employee for permission for a patient to get a script filled multiple times daily.
Additionally competition heated up amongst the chains and the insurance companies took advantage of this. They reduced our reimbursement rates to levels which cut profit margins and in fact sometimes caused a net loss per prescription. The chains faced the possibility of not getting patients in the door if they did not accept the contracts.
Now chain stores know how much money a person walking around the store spends per minute of walking around. They accepted the lower payments in the hope that the patients would come into the store and buy impulse items. Of course they still wanted to maximize profit. The chain stores handled this by decreasing the fixed cost of filling prescriptions... mainly cutting staff hours (especially technicians).
The net result pharmacists are much busier... with less help. Stress levels are intense. We cannot do our jobs up to our own professional standards because you cannot talk to doctors about changing medications to formulary products and counsel patients at the same time.
I see this and I still feel the calling. I'm still here.. however my respect for my employers has certainly lessened and my feelings toward 3rd party payers cannot be expressed in a public forum. However a lot of people considering pharmacy as a career see it and change their majors... or work for a few years and then get out it all together.
And Pharmacy times wants to know why there is a shortage?
|
| P T | 06 Oct 2003 14:41 |
Viva la shortage. I prefer to think of it as a healthy market. I suppose there are not enough pharmacists for the chains to build a pharmacy on every block. Oh well, too bad for the chains.
At my employer, a ~400 bed hospital, since the start of the year, at least 7 pharmacists have been hired, (including me :-) but only about 3 have left. (The imbalance was to fill a need left by an expansion of RPh duties.) Anyway if we could hire a net of 4 RPh, maybe the shortage is not too severe.
I first became interested in pharmacy ~1992, and since than salaries have increased >100%. Nice. I was in retail, and couldn't handle it. I took several months off, and had no trouble finding employment when I was ready, and I'm 48. Nice. The next guy we hired had an identical story. Nice. Give me a shortage anyday.
There is one thing that worries me. My brother faced a larger shortage in his line of work in the late 90s. He was a main frame programmer. There was a mass influx of labor from overseas, and now, it's difficult at best for an "American" to find work in that field. But of course, that could never happen to us . . .
Shortages come and go. Say a prayer tonight to thank God for the shortage.
|
| Aimee G | 06 Oct 2003 13:22 |
I am a retail pharmacist. It allows me to get full-time hours in the space of 3 days, so I can spent the majority of time home with my 2 kids (and wishing I were at work). I have a clinical degree and can easily slip into a position at the husband's place of work (big East Coast manufacturer). As tempting as it would be to have a pretty desk job with a huge salary and --get this-- a LUNCH BREAK! SICK DAYS!! (gasp!)... I love retail.
I love my customers. I love being right there when they need me for all their big and bitty questions and concerns. I get to see bellies grow big with new babies, and I get to see age erased from faces when a patient finally gets pain relief, and I get to hold hands with my customers when all that's needed to brighten someone's day is a simple human touch. I am fulfilled by my role as a retail pharmacist. I try hard to be a good person, and this is the place I get my best practice. I can see why some people don't last in retail-- if your heart isn't in it, if you aren't a people person, if you just don't give a rat's a.s for a stranger's problem, then you are going to be annoyed when customers come to you for compassionate care.
Ok, so it's not glamorous. The stuff I actually get paid to do-- repetitive counting, regulations out the wahzoo, calling petty third parties, explaining copays to pissy people, trying to explain that "Yes, there is an Aisle 6, it's right next to Aisle 5 but there is no sign"...the real work stinks sometimes. We are horribly understaffed-- I guess they budget their tech hours to the point when there are none on duty at some point every day and from 3-9 on Saturdays because it MAKES SENSE to some dope who probably has never even been in my store...ah, the Corporation Mentality...and sometimes I can't get to the other phone in time. But I have a great partner (still don't know how I got so lucky to work with her) and I like the front store staff and I have great customers. The mall has pretty good food and when I actually have a tech working with me, I get to eat. I go home some nights dog tired, and some hours are so busy that I pray out loud not to screw up something. But I love my job because the good outweighs the bad and that's why I am in retail for life.
Aimee
> A brief item in the latest issue of "Pharmacy Times" said that the > pharmacist shortage continues unabated. The article estimated that, for [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > ---Franz Kafka |
| Paul Trusten | 06 Oct 2003 01:18 |
A brief item in the latest issue of "Pharmacy Times" said that the pharmacist shortage continues unabated. The article estimated that, for example, the US chain drug industry is short 5500 pharmacists. The cause, it was suggested, is the lenghtening of the pharmacy program by one academic year to make the Pharm.D. degree.
What else is contributing to the shortage, and to what degree do you think it is? Lack of secondary school training, interest, and/or ability in science? Tuition costs? I know that there was a Congressional study on the issue in the late 1990s, but I'd like to hear from the field. What do you think?
Paul Trusten, R.Ph. 3609 Caldera Boulevard Apartment 122 Midland TX 79707-2872 USA 432-694-6208 ptrusten@cox.net
"There are two cardinal sins, from which all the others spring: impatience and laziness."
---Franz Kafka
|
Quick links:
|
|
|