Re: House windows
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: House windows
| William R Thompson | 29 Jan 2006 09:10 |
> William R Thompson wrote:
>> UV-C is part of sunlight, but it's blocked by >> the atmosphere. It's only a problem if you're in outer space and >> aren't inside a space ship or wearing a space suit--in which case you >> have bigger problems than light. And it turns out that there are UV-C generators that are used to sterilize water, processed foods and surfaces. See
http://www.lenntech.com/will1.htm
That would make me careful around any sterilizing gizmo that uses UV light. Okay, it would make me run for cover.
> 1) What do you know about these plastic shields, Bill? Not much. They're supposed to be highly efficient at reducing UV levels. If I did the math right, they reduce sunlight's UV levels to the equivalent of what you'd get from those forty-watt fluorescent tubes. A friend in Australia told me he had a problem with them. Plastic degrades under sunlight, and after a year or so the plastic had lost a lot of its efficiency. It may last longer under less-intense sunlight, but I'd want to check its reliability every so often. I haven't seen a window-film site that mentions this degradation.
--Bill Thompson
|
| J | 28 Jan 2006 16:06 |
William R Thompson wrote:
> > If my memory serves me correctly and it probably doesn't there are two > > harmful lights, UV and UB? This is only going to eliminate one of them but [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > aren't inside a space ship or wearing a space suit--in which case you > have bigger problems than light. 1) What do you know about these plastic shiedls, Bill?
2) Could you please post all this PDF (under new topic "Skin (Cutaneous) Lupus)" ? Include the source , please. J
http://www.milupus.org/pdf/Cutaneous%20handout.pdf What are the environmental triggers? Photosensitivity (sensitivity to light and other forms of radiation) is a major factor in the induction of most skin lupus. It is extremely important to recognize this and realize that this means an adjustment in lifestyle, not just the use of sunscreen. Photosensitivity may occur 365 days a year, on cloudy as well as sunny days. Ultraviolet radiation that affects lupus is divided into UVA and UVB. The UVB rays are those that we normally associate with sunburn and tans. The UVA rays penetrate more deeply into the skin and do not cause redness or burn. Therefore, they are more insidious and less likely to be noted by you as the trigger for your lupus.
Furthermore, UVA rays are present winter and summer, from dusk until dawn. It is imperative to reduce your exposure to these rays by limiting unnecessary outdoor activity, wearing double layers of clothing, wide brimmed hats, or special sun protective clothing, wearing a broad-spectrum UVA-UVB protective sunscreen every day all year round, preferably SPF 30, and reapply frequently. UVA rays penetrate through window glass, are generated by halogen and fluorescent bulbs, and are emitted from CRT computer screens. Make sure your windows have plastic shields in them (most thermal windows do), use fluorescent and halogen fixtures that are plastic encased, and use a polarizing screen over your computer's CRT. If you are on any medications such as diuretics (water pills), antibiotics, anti-inflammatory pills, hormones (including birth control pills) that may increase photosensitivity, alert your doctor and be especially careful.
Smoking has recently been shown to be a factor in skin lupus and smoke cessation should be undertaken with the help of your doctor to ensure that it is successful. Secondary smoke should also be avoided. Eating a healthy, balanced diet is also very important. Alternative medicines and supplements should be discussed with your doctor. Beware of the many unsupported claims on the internet. They can be dangerous if interpreted without the advice of your doctor.
ANDREW G. FRANKS, JR., M.D., F.A.C.P. Clinical Professor of Dermatology Attending in Rheumatology Chief, Connective Tissue Disease Clinic New York University School of Medicine
|
| William R Thompson | 28 Jan 2006 14:21 |
> If my memory serves me correctly and it probably doesn't there are two > harmful lights, UV and UB? This is only going to eliminate one of them but > does the other automatically become reduced as it passes through glass? UV-A, UV-B and UV-C (also know as EUV, for Extreme Ultra-Violet).
When you look at a rainbow, you're looking at the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum. If I could do anything fancy with text, I'd lay out the colors, but the spectrum looks like this:
(radio waves)(microwaves)(infrared)(red)(orange)(yellow)(green)(blue)(indigo)(violet)(UVA)(UVB)(UVC)(X-rays)(gamma rays)
<--- (least amount of energy at this end)--*--(more energy at this end)--->
If your eyes could see infrared and UV, a rainbow would look wider than normal.
UV-A is the least energetic, longest wavelength of UV light. It's the next "color" of the spectrum, just beyond violet. It passes through glass.
UV-B is a more energetic part of the UV spectrum. Glass blocks it, but it will pass through quartz (as in "quartz-halogen lamps".)
UV-C is the most energetic form of UV light; the next step beyond them is soft X-rays. UV-C is part of sunlight, but it's blocked by the atmosphere. It's only a problem if you're in outer space and aren't inside a space ship or wearing a space suit--in which case you have bigger problems than light.
--Bill Thompson
|
| Beverley | 28 Jan 2006 13:54 |
Oh, are those windows going to make a big difference! Wish we could put them in this old house. (Historic commission will not allow them.)
I don't think I'd sit in the sunlight streaming through but to be able to allow the light in would be wonderful.
If my memory serves me correctly and it probably doesn't there are two harmful lights, UV and UB? This is only going to eliminate one of them but does the other automatically become reduced as it passes through glass?
Maybe J will jump in here and straighten us out. She so good at this stuff. Bev
> ...not to be confused with the computer software... > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Mary |
| Mary Rawle | 27 Jan 2006 18:50 |
...not to be confused with the computer software...
Hello Everyone,
I have a new landlord (this is a *good* thing), and he is replacing the windows in the duplex unit in which I live. He is *so* kind as to ask me what kind of windows I want! Isn't that great? It's an older house with double-hung multipaned glass windows that are pretty but very energy inefficient.
So. He has given me a brochure from BetterBilt windows (this is not an advertisement). They make window that will help our place look like it did before, but with double-paned glass, and I do believe it is a single pane which has bars within that make it look like multipaned glass.
Under "Window Options" it say "Low Emissivity Glass." It goes on to say "...plus most of the sun's damaging ultraviolet light is filtered out, protecting draperies, furniture, carpet [and lupus patients? {my addition}] from fading.
So. Have any of you guys had experience with this "Low Emissivity Glass?" Would I be able to peek out and see the sun shine? Little kids in the neighborhood think I am a witch, because I keep all the windows closed, and wear mostly black (I'm kidding here). But would I be able to open my curtains? that might be a landmark day....
Are they good windows? Do they really help? To what degree? What do y'all think?
Thanks in advance,
Mary
|
Quick links:
|
|
|