Re: crown - captek

You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: crown - captek

Amatus Cremona

26 Feb 2007 19:05

That suggests excessive force from occluDING. If excessive force is placed
on the crown, and the crown and porcelain are stronger than a cast iron
anvil, where does the stress go?

Signature

/

Amatus

/

>
> Well, when the gold coping is exposed in less than 2 years,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> What is wrong with porcelain wear under heavy occlusal forces? Would you
>> prefer catastrophic fracture at the gingival crest?

Dartos	26 Feb 2007 18:58
Well, when the gold coping is exposed in less than 2 years, I think that's a little excessive. ;-( D > What is wrong with porcelain wear under heavy occlusal forces? Would you > prefer catastrophic fracture at the gingival crest?

Amatus Cremona	26 Feb 2007 14:30
What is wrong with porcelain wear under heavy occlusal forces? Would you prefer catastrophic fracture at the gingival crest? Signature / Amatus / >> >> Porcelain wear under occlusal forces. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >>> >>> Steve

Steven Bornfeld	24 Feb 2007 04:10
> Porcelain wear under occlusal forces. > > They fit well and looked good. They just didn't hold up > over time. > > Steve Wow--not fractured? Steve >> Sorry to hear of your bad experience. I haven't used them, and >> the marketing seems to imply superior fit and strength when compared >> to all-ceramics. Otherwise, why use them? How did they fail? >> >> Steve

Steven Fawks	24 Feb 2007 00:52
Porcelain wear under occlusal forces. They fit well and looked good. They just didn't hold up over time. Steve > Sorry to hear of your bad experience. I haven't used them, and the > marketing seems to imply superior fit and strength when compared to > all-ceramics. Otherwise, why use them? How did they fail? > > Steve

Steven Bornfeld

23 Feb 2007 20:30

> Maybe I did something wrong, but I doubt it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> D

Sorry to hear of your bad experience. I haven't used them, and the
marketing seems to imply superior fit and strength when compared to
all-ceramics. Otherwise, why use them? How did they fail?

Steve

>> My dentist recommended that I get a captek crown + bridge. It will
>> cost me $2,000 after insurance. The alternative is to have a silver/
>> metal cown/bridge for $1,200. Is captek worth the extra $800? The
>> bridge is for a molar that is hardly seen when i smile.

Steven Fawks

23 Feb 2007 04:26

Maybe I did something wrong, but I doubt it.

The Captek crowns and bridges that I have done have *not* given
the durability and longevity of conventional porcelain fused
to noble metal.

Looking good for 'a while' doesn't cut it for me.

D

> My dentist recommended that I get a captek crown + bridge. It will
> cost me $2,000 after insurance. The alternative is to have a silver/
> metal cown/bridge for $1,200. Is captek worth the extra $800? The
> bridge is for a molar that is hardly seen when i smile.

3t	23 Feb 2007 03:45
My dentist recommended that I get a captek crown + bridge. It will cost me $2,000 after insurance. The alternative is to have a silver/ metal cown/bridge for $1,200. Is captek worth the extra $800? The bridge is for a molar that is hardly seen when i smile.

Quick links: