You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Restoring status quo ante in a third molar communicating lesion, w. vital pulp
| Steven Bornfeld | 29 Nov 2006 04:07 |
> Due to proximity of adjacent tooth, third lower molar caries resulted > in a communicating lesion for many years, but no pain, with occasional [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > only light tapping pain. One would think there is a low abscess risk as > long as there is an opening.. I have to take your word on the risk of lingual nerve damage in the case of an extraction. I must confess curiosity as to what your role in this scenario is. Your language suggests medical training; however I personally doubt a dentist would consider "eugenol management". Whether the risk of extraction is undertaken depends upon the perceived risk. You imply the third molar is at least partially impacted, but this is not clear. Furthermore, I cannot assume that root canal is "overkill" if extraction is not feasible. Of course the root canal may well not be feasible either; however the consequences of untreated abscess in this area are not insignificant. BTW, if there is exudate from the pulp chamber there is abscess; if the pulp is vital in this case it will not long remain so. If root canal and restoration is not possible I see no option other than extraction. The neglect of this situation during the period when simpler treatment would have been possible seems to me to preclude successful treatment otherwise, and have put the patient in a position where a certain amount of risk is unavoidable.
Steve
|
| mrt1travel@yahoo.com | 29 Nov 2006 03:40 |
Due to proximity of adjacent tooth, third lower molar caries resulted in a communicating lesion for many years, but no pain, with occasional taste of exudate. 3 months ago 4mm piece broke off exposing interior of tooth. With risk of lingual nerve damage on exicision in an adult, the preference is to keep the tooth, but closing the cavity completely is prob. neither possible (due to proximity to gingival surface and access difficulty from adjacent molar ) - or advisable due to likelihood of pressure bildup. What are your preferred solutions ?
1) Exicse (declined, prefer current management with cotton filling placed w. explorer)
2) Rootcanal (declined, overkill for a third molar, would also leave the side open)
3) Eugenol management ?
4) Management with new compound less irritating to oral mucosa than eugenol ?
5) Placing filling after placing a wire in split section so that a canal can allow continued exudate flow?
Thank you for your insight. The pulp is definitively vital, cooling pain disappears at once, there is only light tapping pain. One would think there is a low abscess risk as long as there is an opening..
|
Quick links: