Re: Dentist damages an unrelated tooth - now what?
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Dentist damages an unrelated tooth - now what?
| Steve Richfie1d | 31 Jul 2006 17:27 |
Steven Bornfeld,
I FINALLY think I see what you are trying to say. To summarize what I got from your postings (please correct me if I have misread you): 1. Let the dentist lead the discussion, as he probably has a lot more experience at this than I do. 2. Expect any "settlement" to be in services only. 3. There was NO stated risk, and no pressing reason to extract the wisdom tooth other than its possible contact with the opposing crowned and root canaled 2nd molar that was having some minor pain, possibly from contact with the super-erupted wisdom tooth. Had I known about any significant risk from extraction, then I probably would have left it right where it was.
*HERE* is where the breakdown occurred, because I certainly didn't know of any significant risk, and was not told of any. Indeed, I had been saving that wisdom tooth to anchor a bridged 2nd molar if I should ever need to for some reason, then in extracting the wisdom tooth, the very tooth that it had been saved for was damaged. I would have been a LOT better off by simply grinding some of the wisdom tooth off to avoid contact with the opposing 2nd molar. All this from a stupid lack of communication of what you have been explaining here.
Applying what you said to my precise situation, probably the wrong decision was made (to extract the wisdom tooth) due to a lack of communication (about the risks), incurring a needless risk (of damaging the 2nd molar) that resulted in some hopefully minor damage (that the dentist will probably fix for free). Hence, I should stop worrying about this unless/until I run into some REAL problem. I have an appointment for tomorrow when I should know a LOT more about this.
Thanks for your help here. I'll probably be a much nicer patient for it!
Steve Richfie1d ==============================
>> How should such a major fracture be handled? > [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] > >> Steve Richfie1d |
| Steven Bornfeld | 30 Jul 2006 23:44 |
> How should such a major fracture be handled? Depends on the nature of the fracture. You've already stated your chip was small, so this is only an academic exercise. A big fracture may require crowning; there could be a need for crown lengthening; conceivably root canal treatment; or maybe the tooth would be lost.
What is a second molar
> worth on the open market?! What would be a fair settlement? Obviously there is no "open market" on second molars. Also, obviously this is not a dental question. If you're asking what kind of settlement this might lead to in a court of law, I cannot answer because I do not know. I'm guessing it would hinge not only on the value ("damages" in legal terms) and the implication of negligence. It certainly could be negligence, but IMO not necessarily, because you would have to assume that another dentist exercising due care would be able to do the extraction without damage. Depending on many factors which I can't go into this is not necessarily a valid assumption. I can tell you that not infrequently an oral surgeon will decline to extract a wisdom tooth for me for any number of reasons, but obviously if the extraction is urgent sometimes a certain amount of risk must be assumed by the dentist and surgeon and you hope for the best. Here is where informed consent is important, but all possible complications cannot always be predicted. That's just the nature of the beast.
>> If the tooth was considered a candidate for a crown beforehand, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > last one I did, because of leakage through the crack, and have to be > pulled then. I expect to be around for more than 20 years, but who knows. This is probably just as likely to happen with the amalgam.
>> I don't think the small chip changes the situation, though you may >> think about having it done now. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > leading from the point of damage. How do you deal with expensive repairs > to dentist-caused damage? I'm sorry--I'm sensing a troll here, and I'm not going to get into a complicated argument here. Yes, unexpected things happen--to me too, and I'm not an unsympathetic guy. So in a situation where something unexpected happens, I go over the situation with the patient and we come to an agreement. I'm not going to discuss the process, because it depends on the situation. But I've had very few serious conflicts over 30 years in practice, and I've never paid a patient for some perceived harm. I just don't see this scenario as realistic when two grownups are dealing with each other.
> There has been much commentary here about the stress of dentistry, > obnoxious patients, etc. How does a patient go about NOT being obnoxious [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > What do YOU think would be fair? Doesn't matter what I think--I don't know enough about the particulars of the case, and as I said I can't determine from what you've said that there has been anything done incorrectly at all. You'll have to work that out with your dentist.
Steve
> Steve Richfie1d |
| Steve Richfie1d | 30 Jul 2006 22:16 |
Steven Bornfeld,
>> I just had a super-erupted wisdom tooth extracted. After leaving his >> office, I noticed that the 2nd molar was sharp, and on further [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> reasonable rather than legal advice? Should I expect the dentist to >> fix this for free, or chip in for part of the restoration?
> The answer depends upon the state of the tooth. If it is a small > sharp edge it may just need to be smoothed--no biggie. If this is a [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the next tooth might be considered a normal risk of the extraction, > while a major fracture leading to the loss of the second molar would not. How should such a major fracture be handled? What is a second molar worth on the open market?! What would be a fair settlement?
> If the tooth was considered a candidate for a crown beforehand, It was by another dentist, but I'd rather wait as long as practical to have my teeth last as long as I do. Most of these have big cracks but are not broken (yet), and I presume that once the amalgam is dug out and the tooth is crowned, that it will abscess in 15-20 years or so like the last one I did, because of leakage through the crack, and have to be pulled then. I expect to be around for more than 20 years, but who knows.
> I > don't think the small chip changes the situation, though you may think > about having it done now. You didn't cover any of the interesting cases - where substantial repair may now be needed that wasn't needed before the extraction. To my untrained eye, this looks like a good candidate for some sort of an inlay/onlay to replace the massive old amalgam, which now has a groove the length of the tooth that I can stick the end of my fingernail into leading from the point of damage. How do you deal with expensive repairs to dentist-caused damage?
There has been much commentary here about the stress of dentistry, obnoxious patients, etc. How does a patient go about NOT being obnoxious yet still be treated fairly (whatever that is).
I was considering going in for a routine examination of the tooth without first mentioning the extracted tooth and see what he says. If HE decides that it needs expensive repair, then open the discussion as to who pays what to have it done. Perhaps fair would be for me to cover his out-of-pocket expenses, but have him work for free in repairing the tooth that he damaged.
What do YOU think would be fair?
Steve Richfie1d
|
| Steven Bornfeld | 30 Jul 2006 15:56 |
> I just had a super-erupted wisdom tooth extracted. After leaving his > office, I noticed that the 2nd molar was sharp, and on further [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Steve Richfie1d The answer depends upon the state of the tooth. If it is a small sharp edge it may just need to be smoothed--no biggie. If this is a massive old amalgam you must understand that the tooth is probably fragile and would have been a maintenance problem whether the wisdom tooth were extracted or not. Under the circumstances, a minor chip on the next tooth might be considered a normal risk of the extraction, while a major fracture leading to the loss of the second molar would not. If the tooth was considered a candidate for a crown beforehand, I don't think the small chip changes the situation, though you may think about having it done now.
Steve
|
| Steve Richfie1d | 30 Jul 2006 09:20 |
I just had a super-erupted wisdom tooth extracted. After leaving his office, I noticed that the 2nd molar was sharp, and on further examination it appears that part of the filling is missing and possibly a small part has been chipped off of the rear of the 2nd molar.
The 2nd molar now has a massive old amalgam that would have to be replaced with something else.
What is a reasonable way of handling this, without yelling, screaming, getting everyone's blood pressure up, etc? I am looking for fair and reasonable rather than legal advice? Should I expect the dentist to fix this for free, or chip in for part of the restoration?
Any thoughts?
Steve Richfie1d
|
Quick links:
|
|
|