Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: Captek vs full cast gold coping

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Captek vs full cast gold coping

Scott29 Sep 2005 04:52
I have been reading on the internet regarding Captek and full cast gold
copings.

Full cast gold copings oxidize upon firing - Captek doesn't

However if polished isn't the appearence of Porcelain fused to High 90+% gold
similar and just as long lasting?

The captek process seems to take longer for the labs to produce than the
standard PFM.

Are the only advantage cost and bacteria resistant?

Is there an advantage of porcelain fused (or pressed) to captek vs full cast
gold?

Where can I find the research behind the claim that captek is bacteria
resistant?

Signature

-sw


Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.