Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: Traumatized tooth

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Traumatized tooth

CWatters28 Jul 2005 15:57
The OP mentioned a chip as well so perhaps the dentist thinks he wants a
crown?

Pete -  If you are happy with the chip then tell your dentist that and see
what he says.

Tony Bad28 Jul 2005 12:58
> If there are no fillings on the tooth, and the treating dentist is able to
> access the pulp chamber with a small opening (on the back side of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I hope this was helpful.

I agree with what Steve says, especially this last part. At one time, the
common thought was that every tooth that had a root canal needed a post and
a crown. Although some dentists stick to this way of thinking, it really
isn't true...and a crown shouldn't be considered an automatic need. If tooth
is otherwise sound and whole, a crown may not be needed after the root canal
is completed.

T

Dr Steve27 Jul 2005 14:12
"P T" <Petepenguin@webtv.net> wrote in message news:14534-42E78F92-
> Almost 3 years ago I fell and hit a front tooth. It chipped a little.
> Furthermore, a bright light held behind the tooth reveals cracks.  It
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> What is the urgency level for a procedure on this tooth?

Impossible to tell from a Usenet forum.  Might be a problem in 2 days, might
not act up for 2 more years.

>It has not bothered me (much) for over 2 years, so I have the impression
>this is >an elective decision. Am I wrong?

You are wrong,  A dead pulp will eventually create serious problems.  Your
history of pain makes it more urgent.  If you wait too long, the RCT may be
too difficult to accomplish easily.

>Are bad things happening that I am unaware of?

Yes

> (I am somewhat reluctant to go forward with procedures on this tooth, as
> I have had several crowns, and I believe that crown are never quite as
> comfortable as the original teeth. And there is another issue too, which
> I explore in a different thread here.)

If there are no fillings on the tooth, and the treating dentist is able to
access the pulp chamber with a small opening (on the back side of the
tooth), then you could perhaps skip the crown altogether.  I don't think a
crown will make this tooth any stronger, unless it has lots of fillings in
it already.

I hope this was helpful.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen [What's a Temporary?], D.D.S.
Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.


P T27 Jul 2005 13:43
Almost 3 years ago I fell and hit a front tooth. It chipped a little.
Furthermore, a bright light held behind the tooth reveals cracks.  It
discolored a bit.  It hurt significantly initially.  I had it examined
at that time and was advised I would probably need a root canal
eventually.  Now it still hurts a bit intermittantly, but the pain is
minor, and usually completely controlled by one otc Naproxen.  

Six months ago my dentist did a test with an ice cube and got no
reaction from me, and she proclaimed the tooth dead and in need of root
canal.  I had a communication problem with this dentist and will
probably seek future dental care at a different clinic.  It's time for
my biannual exam, and I'm contemplating having this work done. Although
I will explore these issues with my new dentist, I thought I would ask
here:

What is the urgency level for a procedure on this tooth? It has not
bothered me (much) for over 2 years, so I have the impression this is an
elective decision. Am I wrong? Are bad things happening that I am
unaware of?  

(I am somewhat reluctant to go forward with procedures on this tooth, as
I have had several crowns, and I believe that crown are never quite as
comfortable as the original teeth. And there is another issue too, which
I explore in a different thread here.)

Thanks.
Pete

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.