Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: Ethics, a defination (Cogitate on this for awhile)

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Ethics, a defination (Cogitate on this for awhile)

spondee@cox.net30 Jun 2005 04:18
>Why is it only a dentist's burden to "give a hoot".
Because we are speaking of 'dental care', not appendectomies.

>Have you also posted
>this topic to boards that discuss issues such as government spending or
>taxation?

No

>> Why not try to start a campaign to have a referendum placed on the
>ballot that asks the citizens of your state if they would agree to some
>sacrifice (higher taxes, lower wages...something to provide funding dollars)
>to help provide dental care to those who cannot afford it on their own. My
>guess is that most would say we are already doing enough.

Why don't YOU start such a campaign???  Better it should come from a
professional, yes???

> Let me know how
>that works out. Until then, laying the burden of this responsibility at the
>feet of dentists is unfair. It is the equivalent of protesting outside your
>Safeway store and branding them as unethical because people are going
>hungry.

It is NOT equivalent.  The hungry in any major American city have SOME
resources (non-governmental, btw): soup kitchens, food banks,
(supported BY stores like Safeway!), Safeway's dumpster's, and
begging.  All of which will fill their bellies, but NOT their dental
caries!!!

Get real.  Go downtown in your old clothes and live on the street for
just one day, from dawn to dusk.  Sit in the park, the mall.  Take a
ride on the public transit.  Talk to the disenfranchised. Listen and
watch.  Eat your 'evening' meal at the local soup kitchen (they won't
ask you for ID).  It might be the BEST day of your life and you might
view a lot of things just a little differently.

spondee@REMOVEcox.net

Tony Bad27 Jun 2005 14:08
> The discussion was on the ETHICS of children being in pain from
> toothache, elders not being able to eat, because DENTISTS don't seem
> to give a hoot.

Why is it only a dentist's burden to "give a hoot". Have you also posted
this topic to boards that discuss issues such as government spending or
taxation? Why not try to start a campaign to have a referendum placed on the
ballot that asks the citizens of your state if they would agree to some
sacrifice (higher taxes, lower wages...something to provide funding dollars)
to help provide dental care to those who cannot afford it on their own. My
guess is that most would say we are already doing enough. Let me know how
that works out. Until then, laying the burden of this responsibility at the
feet of dentists is unfair. It is the equivalent of protesting outside your
Safeway store and branding them as unethical because people are going
hungry.

T

spondee@cox.net27 Jun 2005 08:55
>     And my point is...  Three times I have tried to point you to the real
>source of your proplem and three times you have ignored me completly.  You
>obviously have an adgenda of your own and therefore someone to be ignored.
>
>Have a nice day,
>Vaughn

The reason I've been ignoring you is because YOU just don't get it!  I
HAVE no problem, am NOT seeking a dentist.

The discussion was on the ETHICS of children being in pain from
toothache, elders not being able to eat, because DENTISTS don't seem
to give a hoot.

(Though must admit would truly love to have better quality dentures)

The fact is, Medical IS IN PLACE, and offers SOME (albeit very small)
compensation.  People could be getting BASIC dental care if more
dentists would take some Medical Clients

I haven't the slightest idea of where YOU came up with the thought
that I was an ADVOCATE, or LEAGAL EAGLE.  I am just a 'crusader'.  A
run of the mill writer that can SEE when the emperor is naked.

Why don't YOU take your own suggestions instead of trying to pawn them
off for others to do the work for you???

Feel free to 'ignore' me.  Can't say I really need you in my
cyberspace...
spondee@REMOVEcox.net

Vaughn25 Jun 2005 12:06
>> From:  Houghton Mifflin
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>     and your point is...?

    And my point is...  Three times I have tried to point you to the real
source of your proplem and three times you have ignored me completly.  You
obviously have an adgenda of your own and therefore someone to be ignored.

Have a nice day,
Vaughn

> Vaughn

Vaughn25 Jun 2005 12:02
> From:  Houghton Mifflin
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 1.
> a. A set of principles of right conduct.

    and your point is...?

Vaughn

spondee@cox.net25 Jun 2005 05:51
From:  Houghton Mifflin

eth·ic (eth'ik)

n.
1.
a. A set of principles of right conduct.

b. A theory or a system of moral values: "An ethic of service is at
war with a craving for gain" Gregg Easterbrook.

2. ethics (used with a sing. verb) The study of the general nature of
morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by a person; moral
philosophy.

3. ethics (used with a sing. or pl. verb) The rules or standards
governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession:
medical ethics.
spondee@REMOVEcox.net

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.