You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Ethics, a defination (Cogitate on this for awhile)
| Vaughn Simon | 27 Jun 2005 14:43 |
> ...the equivalent of protesting outside your Safeway store and branding them as unethical because people are going
> hungry. Thanks! That is exactly what I was trying to say, but more simply stated.
Vaughn
> T |
| Tony Bad | 27 Jun 2005 14:08 |
> The discussion was on the ETHICS of children being in pain from > toothache, elders not being able to eat, because DENTISTS don't seem > to give a hoot. Why is it only a dentist's burden to "give a hoot". Have you also posted this topic to boards that discuss issues such as government spending or taxation? Why not try to start a campaign to have a referendum placed on the ballot that asks the citizens of your state if they would agree to some sacrifice (higher taxes, lower wages...something to provide funding dollars) to help provide dental care to those who cannot afford it on their own. My guess is that most would say we are already doing enough. Let me know how that works out. Until then, laying the burden of this responsibility at the feet of dentists is unfair. It is the equivalent of protesting outside your Safeway store and branding them as unethical because people are going hungry.
T
|
| spondee@cox.net | 27 Jun 2005 08:55 |
> And my point is... Three times I have tried to point you to the real >source of your proplem and three times you have ignored me completly. You >obviously have an adgenda of your own and therefore someone to be ignored. > >Have a nice day, >Vaughn The reason I've been ignoring you is because YOU just don't get it! I HAVE no problem, am NOT seeking a dentist.
The discussion was on the ETHICS of children being in pain from toothache, elders not being able to eat, because DENTISTS don't seem to give a hoot.
(Though must admit would truly love to have better quality dentures)
The fact is, Medical IS IN PLACE, and offers SOME (albeit very small) compensation. People could be getting BASIC dental care if more dentists would take some Medical Clients
I haven't the slightest idea of where YOU came up with the thought that I was an ADVOCATE, or LEAGAL EAGLE. I am just a 'crusader'. A run of the mill writer that can SEE when the emperor is naked.
Why don't YOU take your own suggestions instead of trying to pawn them off for others to do the work for you???
Feel free to 'ignore' me. Can't say I really need you in my cyberspace... spondee@REMOVEcox.net
|
| Vaughn | 25 Jun 2005 12:06 |
>> From: Houghton Mifflin >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > and your point is...? And my point is... Three times I have tried to point you to the real source of your proplem and three times you have ignored me completly. You obviously have an adgenda of your own and therefore someone to be ignored.
Have a nice day, Vaughn
> Vaughn |
| Vaughn | 25 Jun 2005 12:02 |
> From: Houghton Mifflin > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 1. > a. A set of principles of right conduct. and your point is...?
Vaughn
|
| spondee@cox.net | 25 Jun 2005 05:51 |
From: Houghton Mifflin
eth·ic (eth'ik)
n. 1. a. A set of principles of right conduct.
b. A theory or a system of moral values: "An ethic of service is at war with a craving for gain" Gregg Easterbrook.
2. ethics (used with a sing. verb) The study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by a person; moral philosophy.
3. ethics (used with a sing. or pl. verb) The rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession: medical ethics. spondee@REMOVEcox.net
|
Quick links: