"Actually, what has been described are two ways a person might be
predisposed toward developing type-2 diabetes.

Without metabolic syndrome (MetS), the predisposition is never
realized."

As before, research in support of this claim please?  In past we have
found that too often some confuse opinion and dearly held personal views
in confusion with that which can be supported.  It could be, research
please.

As mentioned before, there is currently a debate among the ADA and other
diabetic specialists as to the reality of mets as a risk prediction over
any of its several possible components, mets is diagnosed where some
number from a possible list is present.  There is also a question of
cause or effect that is not clarified with regard to diabetes and it is
not the case that all with mets proceed to diabetes except as a genetic
basis for the latter is already present only in some.

"Through many days of prayer seeking the LORD's guidance on how to
effectively call out as one of HIS lowly watchmen regarding the
catastrophic event (Revelation 6:14) that may possibly happen sometime
between now and the end of the year"

He just added 10 months to his "maybe".  What a dork. And a quack.