Mark [I] Tindall (Iam@home0000298): "They have forgotten that Christians
are allowed to disagree with each other. Paul disagreed with Peter.
PROTEST-ants disagreed with Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify
one's stance as a Christian."
(ru) dolf: "He followed me at least 100 meters down Bayswater Road
calling out to me. The intensity of his grip shown clearly by the
clarity of bruise marks on my arm.
I fumbled endlessly, trying to undo the cuff link to my calibre shirt.
'Here let me help you.'
I just returned some brochures to a box company. And I want to show you
the result.
'It's alright I'm just talking to my husband.'
He said the brochures weren't the companies, even though their address
was on it. Surely they'd be aware that their company was doing an
advertising drop.
Although I had noticed that there was an unexplained category {ie.
monkey stools} dispersal of them around the area.
I found it appalling that someone should respond with such
intensity--And only stopped when, I ventured into the traffic--it was
sufficiently light, but it slowed.
I'll have some of those sweets there--the same ones and only one he gave
me for the road.
Yes those black ones there.
'I've got some prepacked.'
Those three there--I'll consume those lollies today.
I strutted out in my SealKay (r): We Are The Ones, the only
ones--independent Jeans and my RM Williams boots."
http://www.thebritishlollyshop.com.au/
Sorry mate but your Christian Internet Identity is a fraud and is simply
attempting to map its semantics to the a priori cognitive elements
within my grapple paradigm (Viz. Terra Australis as point within an
global information economy)
This is a Natural and Common Law Intellectual Property Right I assert
over your propaganda below...
http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/automata.html
Isn't it barbaric to impale citizens on their national symbols: "It is
not the critic who counts, nor the man who points out how the strong man
stumbled, or where the doer of the deed could have done better. The
credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is
marred by dust and sweat and blood; who survives valiantly; who errs and
comes short again and again; who knows great enthusiasms, great
devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows
in the end the triumph of high achievement; and who, at the worst, if he
fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall
never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor
defeat." [Theodore Roosevelt, For God & Country, Operation Whitecoat
1954-1973, Robert L. Mole D. Min., Dr. Dale M. Mole]
rhuff163 <rhuff163@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> Devotional Guide For the Week of June 28, 2009
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> saved, if you hold it fast unless you believed in vain. For I
> delivered to you as of
> first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins
> in accordance with the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was
> raised on the third day in accordance with the scripturesŠ²(1
> Corinthians 15:1-4)
>
> Thirty-four-year-old John Adams agreed to defend the soldiers who committed
> the Boston massacre. March 5, 1770 was a cold, moonlit night. A few men and
> some boys went to the Old State House looking for trouble. A lone
> British sentry became the brunt of taunts from these angry colonists
> incensed by the
> policies of the king. Shortly after nine o¹clock a church bell
> sounded the fire alarm and called men to action from all over the
> city. Some converged on the State House where the Redcoats were
> reinforced by eight soldiers with
> loaded muskets and fixed bayonets. Snowballs followed by chunks of
> ice and stones provoked one of the sentries to open fire. When the
> smoke cleared, five Bostonians lay dead on the street. Paul Revere
> published a print of the
> encounter that Sam Adams called a ³bloody butchery.² Some considered
> this the first skirmish in the Revolutionary War that followed five
> years later.
> The colonists wanted vengeance for the shootings, but John Adams won
> acquittal based on self-defense. ³Facts,² Adams told the jury, ³are stubborn
> things and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the
> dictums of our passions, they cannot alter the state of the facts and
> evidences.² It is
> for this exact same reason that the gospel of Jesus Christ is still
> being believed twenty centuries after Christ was crucified.
>
> To Do:
>
> The Christian faith is founded on the stubborn fact that the Jesus crucified
> by the Roman governor returned to life on the third day after being
> buried and has the authority of God to save to the uttermost anyone
> and everyone who will turn to him in faith. He risks eternal
> destruction who will not bow
> to the command of God to trust the saving grace of his Son.
>
> 07029$-07033
>
> <š{{{{{{><
(ru) dolf: "Are you an Übermensch American, what other than Brüno could
be more complex than that? Thirty-four-year-old John Adams agreed to
defend the soldiers who committed the Boston massacre. 5 March 1770 was
a cold, moonlit night. A few men and some boys went to the Old State
House looking for trouble. A lone British sentry became the brunt of
taunts from these angry colonists incensed by the policies of the king.
Shortly after nine o'clock a church bell sounded the fire alarm and
called men to action from all over the city. Some converged on the State
House where the Redcoats were reinforced by eight soldiers with loaded
muskets and fixed bayonets. Snowballs followed by chunks of ice and
stones provoked one of the sentries to open fire. When the smoke
cleared, five Bostonians lay dead on the street. Paul Revere published a
print of the encounter that Sam Adams called a 'bloody butchery.'"
(ru) dolf: "Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you
might seek to dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into
irrational sentences so you close your parallel and cross market
pitch--loop cycle..."
;;;Matt;;; (trdell1234@nsgmail.com): "They might be trying to restart
the Griz cult under a new name. Vera did tell me I should post to
another group or maybe it was Grace she said this too. The new rule
everyone who disagrees with them is a Heretic. Sounds like a Cult
doctrine to me."
For further adventures of the heimelijk schimmel heer Bruno see...
- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/kangaroo.html
| 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage