Re: The Quackery of Homeopathy
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free MedKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: The Quackery of Homeopathy
| t | 01 Jun 2009 22:01 |
Jeffy, the not doctor, blathered a lot. So , Snippety snip snip snip. "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:U9YUl.136$u86.125
|
| Jeff | 01 Jun 2009 21:58 |
>>> By an incredible coincidence, you appear to BLINDLY accept that >>> vaccination is of benefit, you seem to ignore the obvious problems and [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > > IS THAT SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR YOU OR WOULD YOU LIKE MORE?? Neither. I would a specific answer to my question. Your answer is like asking someone what he had for lunch and the person vomiting to show what he had for lunch
The information you provided neither was specific nor did it really answer the question.
>> The other supposedly obvious problems are well-known, but very rare. >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > EXCUSE ME? This is a totally unfair comparison -> Homeopathic cancer > research is in its INFANCY, So we should just let people die, because homeopathic cancer research is in its infancy?
> while standard medicine cancer research > has had decades of research AND hundreds of millions of dollars. Actually, billions of dollars. And it is still only in its infancy, too.
> There are at present NO Homeopathic cures for cancer - only research > in places like Cuba, Brazil and India, where special interests and > medical monopolists have little or no power. And there is little or no scientific expertise, either.
> Even the Chinese, with thousands of years of Herbal books and use, > are just getting around to scientific testing in some promising areas > of herbal cures for cancer. Results are years away, perhaps at least > 5 or 10. So they had 1000s of years, but not evidence.
>> Other major breakthroughs include in type I diabetes, where there is no >> cure, but patients are able to live fairly normal lives for decades [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > reach a plateau beyond which additional progress is problematic. This > includes the best rehabilitation and the best medicines. Proper stroke care includes determining the type of stroke (hemmorhagic or embolic), stabilization, possible causes (e.g., clots in heart or arteries leading to the brain), prevention of further strokes and possible use of clot-busting drugs like tPA or streptokinase.
>> opthamology where patients with early >> macular degeneration are able to keep their sight, etc. > > Some injected drugs will help stabilize the effects caused by macular > degeneration dry type (the less severe of the two types). I'm not > certain on the reversal of damage but doubt it. Who said reversal of damage?
> The addition of > dietary substances such as Lutein seems to aid in slowing the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > some benefit but do not constitute any sort of determinative treatment > either. May have? Gee, that's a strong statement.
>> Please show the evidence about the disease that homeopathy is able to >> cure or prevent. > > Not my problem - that is for the Homeopathy researchers to do - please > see their research, or take the easy way out and pretend it does not > exist. In other words, you can't back your claim.
>>> However, it is clear from the nature of the poisonous and immune >>> system destroying consequences of these "treatments" AND from the [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > You yourself stated a survival rate, in general, of 50%. > Not too good, eh? Can't back your claim, again.
>>> Hopefully you advocacy of these kinds of treatments DOES NOT include >>> violation of an individual's freedom of medical choice, including [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > In Feb the state of Texas mandated mandatory gardasil vaccine for > schoolgirls. No it didn't. Parents still don't have to get their girls vaccinated. They have other options, like opting out for religious or philosophical reasons.
> If I'm correct on this and some court has not challenged it, I hope > you will join us in protesting this. I support the action the governor took, although I am concerned that he has ties to the drug industry.
>> The court-orderedchemotherapy >> treatments have a 90% chance of saving the patient's life. And even the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > SURVIVED. He's doing quite well now, without having his immune system > shot to hell, thank you very much. So? The fact is that he has about a 0% chance of surviving without treatment and 90% chance with treatment.
>>> Criticisms of the standard medical systems and the numerous >>> associations between government, standard medicine and pharmacy [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I would like to see them subject to the same rules for testing as the > other drug companies. I totally agree. WHen the FDA was created, the homeopaths got their drugs grandfathered in so they didn't need to be tested or show safety or efficacy.
>> The pharmaceutical industry exists to make money for the stockholders. >> Nothing wrong with that. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > special tax rules and other incentives. Observe that we are in the > worst recession in over 50 years and yet oil prices are rising!!!! The oil prices are down from before the recession.
> This does not jive with reality. Neither do your comments.
> Apple does sell an excellent product, and does exist to make money for > themselves and their stockholders - but knows that to do so they must > lower costs, innovate and stay competitive - which is exactly what > they have been doing. So must ExxonMobil. And ExxonMobil has enough sense and money to continue exploring when the other oil companies stopped over the last year or so.
>>> YOU are advised to read "The Secret History of the War on Cancer" by >>> Davis, a recent best seller, to get some perspective on where the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > little more science and less marketing, in ALL fields of medicine, > would be of benefit to all. The same should apply to homeopathy (it is neither a science or a field of medicine).
Jeff
> Citizen Jimserac |
| Citizen Jimserac | 01 Jun 2009 03:42 |
> > By an incredible coincidence, you appear to BLINDLY accept that > > vaccination is of benefit, you seem to ignore the obvious problems and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > what "genetic damgage?" Please be specific. MECHANISMS OF VACCINATION SEQUELAE by Teresa Binstock Researcher in Developmental and Behavioral Neuroanatomy http://www.jorsm.com/~binstock/vacc-let.htm At Whale
"Role of Immunogenetics in the Diagnosis of Postvaccinal CNS Pathology," Massimo Montinari, et al., Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Bari, Italy, presented May 9, 1996 (text available http://www.healthy.net/library/articles/coulter/biochem.htm ): after thirty children were found to have signs of central nervous system and genetic damage following vaccination, the authors remark, "A study of the disease associated with genes of the HLA system has shown that this genetic complex can be responsible for am particular genetic susceptibility, predisposing to various diseases characterized predominantly by immune-system pathogenesis… results indicate that autoimmune pathology is more frequent in countries where vaccination is more widespread….." [A fuller description of this study will be found in "The attenuated virus--infectious or not?" below.]
The hepatitis B vaccine, Recombivax HB, manufactured by Merck and Co., is a recombinant DNA vaccine. It is produced by cloning the hepatitis virus, and then, adding the cloned virus to a yeast-based culture. This culture, as with all vaccine cultures, contains a variety of foreign proteins originating from other viruses and bacteria. In 1971, scientists in Geneva discovered that when viral proteins are injected directly into the bloodstream, they combine with human genetic material, causing DNA to mutate. 5 [5. "Vaccines and Production of Negative genetic Changes In Humans," Leading Edge Research Group, 1996-1998. See www.trufax.org/vaccine/vacgen.html] Since 1987, there have been at least 38 reports in international medical literature showing that the hepatitis B vaccine causes chronic autoimmune and neurological disease in both children and adults.11 Because it is genetically engineered, Recombivax HB can confuse the body's immune system into attacking itself resulting in an auto-immune response such as multiple sclerosis (MS).12 In 1997, while publicly defending hepatitis B vaccine, the CDC produced an internal memo suggesting a "possible association between the vaccine and multiple sclerosis."13 [11. "Hepatitis B, The Untold Story": a 16-page Report sent to 55,000 pediatricians by the National Vaccine Information Center in 1999. 12. "Ounce of Prevention, Pound of Misery?" Insight Magazine, March 22, 1999, In this article, Dr. Bonnie Dunbar, professor of cell biology at Baylor College of Medicine and an award-winning vaccine research scientist has stated that because the hepatitis B vaccine derives from a surface protein of virus molecules, the similarities between the antigen and proteins in human nerves and tissues may trick the autoimmune systems of the genetically susceptible into attacking themselves. Dunbar says it may take months or years for the auto- immune response to become obvious. 13. "Shots in the Dark," American Spectator Magazine, May 1999. 14. "Hep B Vaccine Linked Directly to Autoimmune Rheumatoid Diseases," From Doctor's Guide to Medical and Other News, www.pslgroup.com/mednews.htm. ] http://www.vaclib.org/intro/hepbinfo.htm
from: http://www.vaclib.org/news/geneticquotes.htm
IS THAT SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR YOU OR WOULD YOU LIKE MORE??
> The other supposedly obvious problems are well-known, but very rare. > > What is not as well known is the what happens to kids who get the > diseases the vaccines prevent. Kids die from chicken pox, measles, > mumps, rubella (and get birth defects), invasive Hib infection, etc.
> > - and you also have some sort > > of near hysterical bigotry and bias against Homeopathy - completely [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > with homeopathy and about 50% of patients are cured with conventional > therapy, I would call that major. EXCUSE ME? This is a totally unfair comparison -> Homeopathic cancer research is in its INFANCY, while standard medicine cancer research has had decades of research AND hundreds of millions of dollars. There are at present NO Homeopathic cures for cancer - only research in places like Cuba, Brazil and India, where special interests and medical monopolists have little or no power.
Even the Chinese, with thousands of years of Herbal books and use, are just getting around to scientific testing in some promising areas of herbal cures for cancer. Results are years away, perhaps at least 5 or 10.
> Other major breakthroughs include in type I diabetes, where there is no > cure, but patients are able to live fairly normal lives for decades > versus a few months without insulin; Agree.
> growth hormone, which is able to > let kids achieve normal height, trauma care, heart attack and brain > attack (stroke) care, where patients are often able to leave the > hospital to lead normal lives, Disagree on the strokes. Current stroke care involves some rehabilitation but often does not utilize herbs, Acupuncture and other alternative medicine therapies which may improve the patient or speed their improvement, or improve them when the standards methods fail to achieve useful results. Your generalization indeed has some merit but is not determinative. I believe that right now, typically, the range of movement and other gains in the early post stroke recovery phase reach a plateau beyond which additional progress is problematic. This includes the best rehabilitation and the best medicines.
> opthamology where patients with early > macular degeneration are able to keep their sight, etc. Some injected drugs will help stabilize the effects caused by macular degeneration dry type (the less severe of the two types). I'm not certain on the reversal of damage but doubt it. The addition of dietary substances such as Lutein seems to aid in slowing the progression of dry type too. Treatment of wet type macular degeneration can stablize the leakage but does not in general seem seem to provide any reversal from the damage already done. Alternative medicine, including Acupuncture and Herbs also may have some benefit but do not constitute any sort of determinative treatment either.
> Please show the evidence about the disease that homeopathy is able to > cure or prevent. Not my problem - that is for the Homeopathy researchers to do - please see their research, or take the easy way out and pretend it does not exist.
> > However, it is clear from the nature of the poisonous and immune > > system destroying consequences of these "treatments" AND from the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Citations please that show that those who survived the first treatments > often chose death rather than a repetition of the treatments. Use a search engine and find out for yourself. You yourself stated a survival rate, in general, of 50%. Not too good, eh?
> > Hopefully you advocacy of these kinds of treatments DOES NOT include > > violation of an individual's freedom of medical choice, including > > state forced vaccinations and court orderedchemotherapytreatments > > such as has already happened here. > > No state forces vaccines on anyone. In Feb the state of Texas mandated mandatory gardasil vaccine for schoolgirls. If I'm correct on this and some court has not challenged it, I hope you will join us in protesting this.
> The court-orderedchemotherapy > treatments have a 90% chance of saving the patient's life. And even the > family admitted that they were in the kid's best interest, according to > the newspaper accounts. You forgot to mention the testimony of someone who was on the run from the law years ago for the same problem, avoided the treatment and SURVIVED. He's doing quite well now, without having his immune system shot to hell, thank you very much.
> > Criticisms of the standard medical systems and the numerous > > associations between government, standard medicine and pharmacy [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > As opposed to homeopathy, where the practicioners don't charge any fees, > all have outside jobs and have no financial motives at all? Many Homeopathists are honest hard working, often MD's - a few fraudsters are out there too, I'm sure, but they're in every branch of medicine. And there is a profit making Homeopathy industry to be sure; Nothing new there. I would like to see them subject to the same rules for testing as the other drug companies.
> The pharmaceutical industry exists to make money for the stockholders. > Nothing wrong with that. Agree fully!
>ExxonMobil and Apple both sell excellent > product. But, they both exist to make money for their stockholders, not > to make fuel so we can drive or computers and iPods so we can work and > be entertained. Strongly disagree one the first, agree on the second. Exxon Mobil is part of an organized energy cartel. They are not really interested in increasing production and reducing costs because their suppliers and their entire market is no longer a free market, is not governed by the rules of free market economics, and is helped by government fiat, special tax rules and other incentives. Observe that we are in the worst recession in over 50 years and yet oil prices are rising!!!! This does not jive with reality.
Apple does sell an excellent product, and does exist to make money for themselves and their stockholders - but knows that to do so they must lower costs, innovate and stay competitive - which is exactly what they have been doing.
> > YOU are advised to read "The Secret History of the War on Cancer" by > > Davis, a recent best seller, to get some perspective on where the > > cancer-ists went wrong, and, more importantly, WHY. > > I don't have money or time waste on this crap. Check it out at the local library - it is a REALLY good overview of why, if there has been all this money expended on all this research for all this length of time, the results are so scanty. The author is fully credentialed and knows her topic well. The implications are disturbing to say the least.
Side note on Homeopathy and Vaccines -> BOTH are currently being used on third world populations as a cheap way to do experiments and testing. THIS is wrong. Until the vaccine or Homeopathic is FULLY TESTED in at least some controlled lab situations and published, this sort of thing SHOULD be stopped.
On the other hand, conditions may be so desperate that they give their consent to try anything - if that is so, and it is a possibility, then it should be made clear to them the unproven nature of the treatments and the likelihood of failure. Either the WHO or the United Nations, or BOTH, should be regulating this.
As often happens in these field trial situations, the successes are widely touted and the failures are pushed aside and ignored. A little more science and less marketing, in ALL fields of medicine, would be of benefit to all.
Citizen Jimserac
|
| Jeff | 31 May 2009 22:25 |
> By an incredible coincidence, you appear to BLINDLY accept that > vaccination is of benefit, you seem to ignore the obvious problems and > deaths that occur in a small percentage of the vaccinations, the > vaccinations that "didn't take", the vaccinations on babies > irrespective of possible genetic damage what "genetic damgage?" Please be specific.
The other supposedly obvious problems are well-known, but very rare.
What is not as well known is the what happens to kids who get the diseases the vaccines prevent. Kids die from chicken pox, measles, mumps, rubella (and get birth defects), invasive Hib infection, etc.
> - and you also have some sort > of near hysterical bigotry and bias against Homeopathy - completely [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > over more than 30 years and have indeed made some minor breakthroughs, > particularly in the area of childhood leukemia. I disagree. Considering that about 0% of patients with cancer are cured with homeopathy and about 50% of patients are cured with conventional therapy, I would call that major.
Other major breakthroughs include in type I diabetes, where there is no cure, but patients are able to live fairly normal lives for decades versus a few months without insulin; growth hormone, which is able to let kids achieve normal height, trauma care, heart attack and brain attack (stroke) care, where patients are often able to leave the hospital to lead normal lives, opthamology where patients with early macular degeneration are able to keep their sight, etc.
Please show the evidence about the disease that homeopathy is able to cure or prevent.
> However, it is clear from the nature of the poisonous and immune > system destroying consequences of these "treatments" AND from the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > irrespective of the fact, that yes, these radiations and poison > chemicals do indeed kill cancer cells. Citations please that show that those who survived the first treatments often chose death rather than a repetition of the treatments.
> Hopefully you advocacy of these kinds of treatments DOES NOT include > violation of an individual's freedom of medical choice, including > state forced vaccinations and court ordered chemotherapy treatments > such as has already happened here. No state forces vaccines on anyone. The court-ordered chemotherapy treatments have a 90% chance of saving the patient's life. And even the family admitted that they were in the kid's best interest, according to the newspaper accounts.
> Criticisms of the standard medical systems and the numerous > associations between government, standard medicine and pharmacy > industry and other special interests that have given rise to this > monodimensional approach have now arisen, like an oncoming tidal wave > and will soon wash away this anti-human scientism in the tsunami of > reforms to come. As opposed to homeopathy, where the practicioners don't charge any fees, all have outside jobs and have no financial motives at all?
The pharmaceutical industry exists to make money for the stockholders. Nothing wrong with that. ExxonMobil and Apple both sell excellent product. But, they both exist to make money for their stockholders, not to make fuel so we can drive or computers and iPods so we can work and be entertained.
> YOU are advised to read "The Secret History of the War on Cancer" by > Davis, a recent best seller, to get some perspective on where the > cancer-ists went wrong, and, more importantly, WHY. I don't have money or time waste on this crap.
Jeff
> Citizen Jimserac |
| Citizen Jimserac | 31 May 2009 13:27 |
By an incredible coincidence, you appear to BLINDLY accept that vaccination is of benefit, you seem to ignore the obvious problems and deaths that occur in a small percentage of the vaccinations, the vaccinations that "didn't take", the vaccinations on babies irrespective of possible genetic damage - and you also have some sort of near hysterical bigotry and bias against Homeopathy - completely ignoring the genuine research which has repeatedly indicated that high dilution solutions with NO REMAINING molecules of the stimulant are STILL ABLE to cause biological effects - see M. Ennis, Inflammation Research, vol 53, p181, and NUMEROUS repetitions, most of them positive.
Regarding Cancer, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, have been expended over more than 30 years and have indeed made some minor breakthroughs, particularly in the area of childhood leukemia. However, it is clear from the nature of the poisonous and immune system destroying consequences of these "treatments" AND from the fact that those unfortunates who were lucky enough to survive the first "treatment" often chose death rather than a repetition ( the cancer has "reactivated" and you will need a few more "treatments") of chemotherapy or radiation is indicative of FUNDAMENTAL AND SYSTEMIC fallacies both in the nature of these treatments and in the complete disregard for the long term consequences to the patient - and this irrespective of the fact, that yes, these radiations and poison chemicals do indeed kill cancer cells.
Hopefully you advocacy of these kinds of treatments DOES NOT include violation of an individual's freedom of medical choice, including state forced vaccinations and court ordered chemotherapy treatments such as has already happened here.
Criticisms of the standard medical systems and the numerous associations between government, standard medicine and pharmacy industry and other special interests that have given rise to this monodimensional approach have now arisen, like an oncoming tidal wave and will soon wash away this anti-human scientism in the tsunami of reforms to come.
YOU are advised to read "The Secret History of the War on Cancer" by Davis, a recent best seller, to get some perspective on where the cancer-ists went wrong, and, more importantly, WHY.
Citizen Jimserac
|
| Happy Oyster | 27 May 2009 00:06 |
>Cancer is still a "mystery" disease for the allopath, But the best are homeopaths. They do not even understand homeopathy. ;O)
So, do not believ homeopaths. Homeopathy kills.
http://www.kinderaerzteimnetz.de/bvkj/krankheit/show.php3?id=73&nodeid=59 (Hervorhebungen von mir) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Haemophilus influenzae Typ b (Hib)
Allgemeines
Das Bakterium Haemophilus influenzae Typ b (Hib) spielt besonders bei Kleinkindern im Alter bis zu 5 Jahren eine wesentliche Rolle.
Die dadurch ausgelösten Infektionskrankheiten waren bis zur Einführung der vorbeugenden Impfung für diese Altersgruppe sehr gefürchtet.
Die Keime verursachen bei Kindern bis zu 3 Jahren in erster Linie eine besonders schwere Form von Hirnhautentzündung.
Bei Kindern bis zu 5 Jahren war die Entzündung des Kehldeckels (Epiglottitis) lebensbedrohlich. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vaccination saves lives. Or do you invest in coffins?
 Signature DIE ERSTE REIMBIBEL SEIT DEM MITTELALTER http://www.reimbibel.de
|
| drceephd@insightbb.com | 26 May 2009 14:15 |
> >http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Jeff Cancer is still a "mystery" disease for the allopath, and why anyone survives their cut/burn/poison approach is also a mystery. The allopath does not know why chemo works as poorly as it does. Experts in this area report that the correct cure rate for cancer treated allopathically is 2.1%. 2.1% is hardly 85%.
DrCee You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons
|
| Jeff | 26 May 2009 11:04 |
> http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html With Hodgkin's Disease, there is about an 85% chance of survival with proper treatment. The so-called "natural treatments" that the family is trying to use not only are not working in this case (the tumors are getting larger), but, there is no evidence that "natural treatments" work.
The question the court is dealing with is: Does the state have the right to force treatment on a child with a disease that has a 85% survival rate when the family wants to do nothing?
In this case, the courts are ruling not to give the kid chemotherapy is medical neglect.
Jeff
|
| john | 26 May 2009 05:31 |
http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html
|
Quick links:
|
|
|