Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: [2009 May] The Quackery of Chemotherapy, Gunpoint Medicine and the Disturbing Fate of 13-Year-Old Daniel Hauser

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: [2009 May] The Quackery of Chemotherapy, Gunpoint Medicine and the Disturbing Fate of 13-Year-Old Daniel Hauser

Jeff26 May 2009 23:14
> "Peter Moran" <pmoran@internode.on.net> wrote in message
> news:00377b4f$0$9731> It is very difficult to support forcing any child to
> undergo chemotherapy.

When the choice is a 15% chance of death and 85% chance of cure after
getting chemotherapy vs. a 100% chance of death without it, the decision
seems easier.

Jeff

john26 May 2009 16:31
"Peter Moran" <pmoran@internode.on.net> wrote in message
news:00377b4f$0$9731> It is very difficult to support forcing any child to
undergo chemotherapy.
> That is an awful prospect and possibly not even feasible, especially
> without parental support. .   But this is an entirely separate
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> PM

bollocks, its fascist medicine http://www.whale.to/cancer/articles.html

50% more like and that is only 5 years, hardly a cure, then you torture the
child, and give it cancer down the line, while everyone fears it will return
as you haven't treated the cause, only palliated the symptoms

idiotic really

see http://www.whale.to/a/cancer_c.html

"The American Medical Association is fashioned to prescribe drugs and
perform various treatments that although they may be unsuspecting, tend to
weed out the weaker species. The Council views the AMA's 'modern medicine'
as barbaric.."-Brice Taylor (Thanks For The Memories p 283)

Peter Moran26 May 2009 07:57
> http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html

It is very difficult to support forcing any child to undergo chemotherapy.
That is an awful prospect and possibly not even feasible, especially without
parental support. .   But this is an entirely separate consideration from
what would be best for the child.  It is a tragic and difficult situation
for all.   Know-nothings like Mike Adams do, literally, know nothing, and
should not be trying to inflame the situation further.   They should at
least be quite explicit if they are really prepared to urge the avoidance of
chemotherapy at any cost, even that of a painful, slow, early death.

There is no evidence that any "alternative" treatment will produce remission
or cure Hodgkins disease but plenty of evidence that chemotherapy can
produce prolonged, symptom-free remissions, if not cure.

See  http://members.bordernet.com.au/~pmoran/Hodgkin'ssurvival.htm  showing
how survival rates have improved over time. These survival figures refer to
"all comers", including more aggressive and advanced cases.   This boy had a
relatively early stage and would have had an even better outlook, if he had
continued treatment once it had started and he was already showing a good
response.

PM

john26 May 2009 05:31
http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.