what "genetic damgage?" Please be specific.

The other supposedly obvious problems are well-known, but very rare.

What is not as well known is the what happens to kids who get the
diseases the vaccines prevent. Kids die from chicken pox, measles,
mumps, rubella (and get birth defects), invasive Hib infection, etc.

I disagree. Considering that about 0% of patients with cancer are cured
with homeopathy and about 50% of patients are cured with conventional
therapy, I would call that major.

Other major breakthroughs include in type I diabetes, where there is no
cure, but patients are able to live fairly normal lives for decades
versus a few months without insulin; growth hormone, which is able to
let kids achieve normal height, trauma care, heart attack and brain
attack (stroke) care, where patients are often able to leave the
hospital to lead normal lives, opthamology where patients with early
macular degeneration are able to keep their sight, etc.

Please show the evidence about the disease that homeopathy is able to
cure or prevent.

Citations please that show that those who survived the first treatments
often chose death rather than a repetition of the treatments.

No state forces vaccines on anyone. The court-ordered chemotherapy
treatments have a 90% chance of saving the patient's life. And even the
family admitted that they were in the kid's best interest, according to
the newspaper accounts.

As opposed to homeopathy, where the practicioners don't charge any fees,
all have outside jobs and have no financial motives at all?

The pharmaceutical industry exists to make money for the stockholders.
Nothing wrong with that. ExxonMobil and Apple both sell excellent
product. But, they both exist to make money for their stockholders, not
to make fuel so we can drive or computers and iPods so we can work and
be entertained.

I don't have money or time waste on this crap.

Jeff

By an incredible coincidence, you appear to BLINDLY accept that
vaccination is of benefit, you seem to ignore the obvious problems and
deaths that occur in a small percentage of the vaccinations, the
vaccinations that "didn't take", the vaccinations on babies
irrespective of possible genetic damage -  and you also have some sort
of near hysterical bigotry and bias against Homeopathy - completely
ignoring the genuine research which has repeatedly indicated that high
dilution solutions with NO REMAINING molecules of the stimulant are
STILL ABLE to cause biological effects - see M. Ennis, Inflammation
Research, vol 53, p181, and NUMEROUS repetitions, most of them
positive.

Regarding Cancer, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, have been expended
over more than 30 years and have indeed made some minor breakthroughs,
particularly in the area of childhood leukemia.
However, it is clear from the nature of the poisonous and immune
system destroying consequences of these "treatments"  AND from the
fact that those unfortunates who were lucky enough to survive the
first "treatment" often chose death rather than a repetition ( the
cancer has "reactivated" and you will need a few more "treatments") of
chemotherapy or radiation is indicative of FUNDAMENTAL AND SYSTEMIC
fallacies both in the nature of these treatments and in the complete
disregard for the long term consequences to the patient - and this
irrespective of the fact, that yes, these radiations and poison
chemicals do indeed kill cancer cells.

Hopefully you advocacy of these kinds of treatments DOES NOT include
violation of an individual's freedom of medical choice, including
state forced vaccinations and court ordered chemotherapy treatments
such as has already happened here.

Criticisms of the standard medical systems and the numerous
associations between government, standard medicine and pharmacy
industry and other special interests that have given rise to this
monodimensional approach have now arisen, like an oncoming tidal wave
and will soon wash away this anti-human scientism in the tsunami of
reforms to come.

YOU are advised to read "The Secret History of the War on Cancer" by
Davis, a recent best seller, to get some perspective on where the
cancer-ists went wrong, and, more importantly, WHY.

Citizen Jimserac

But the best are homeopaths. They do not even understand homeopathy. ;O)

So, do not believ homeopaths. Homeopathy kills.

http://www.kinderaerzteimnetz.de/bvkj/krankheit/show.php3?id=73&nodeid=59
(Hervorhebungen von mir)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haemophilus influenzae Typ b (Hib)

Allgemeines

Das Bakterium Haemophilus influenzae Typ b (Hib)
spielt besonders bei Kleinkindern im Alter bis
zu 5 Jahren eine wesentliche Rolle.

Die dadurch ausgelösten Infektionskrankheiten waren
bis zur Einführung der vorbeugenden Impfung für
diese Altersgruppe sehr gefürchtet.

Die Keime verursachen bei Kindern bis zu 3 Jahren
in erster Linie eine besonders schwere Form von
Hirnhautentzündung.

Bei Kindern bis zu 5 Jahren war die Entzündung des
Kehldeckels (Epiglottitis) lebensbedrohlich.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vaccination saves lives. Or do you invest in coffins?

Cancer is still a "mystery" disease for the allopath, and why anyone
survives their cut/burn/poison approach is also a mystery.  The
allopath does not know why chemo works as poorly as it does.
Experts in this area report that the correct cure rate for cancer
treated allopathically is 2.1%.  2.1% is hardly 85%.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons

With Hodgkin's Disease, there is about an 85% chance of survival with
proper treatment. The so-called "natural treatments" that the family is
trying to use not only are not working in this case (the tumors are
getting larger), but, there is no evidence that "natural treatments" work.

The question the court is dealing with is: Does the state have the right
to force treatment on a child with a disease that has a 85% survival
rate when the family wants to do nothing?

In this case, the courts are ruling not to give the kid chemotherapy is
medical neglect.

Jeff