You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: The Quackery of Chemotherapy, Gunpoint Medicine and the Disturbing Fate of 13-Year-Old Daniel Hauser
| KevysMom | 27 May 2009 00:08 |
> Cancer is still a "mystery" disease for the allopath, and why anyone > survives their cut/burn/poison approach is also a mystery. The > allopath does not know why chemo works as poorly as it does. > Experts in this area report that the correct cure rate for cancer > treated allopathically is 2.1%. 2.1% is hardly 85%. Why does cancer grow? When cells are partially damaged they keep producing and you land up with an over-expression of cells(Thats what cancer is, an over-expression of cells) If you can use radiation to completely destroy that particular cell, it will "turn it off". Isnt that what Chemo does?
On May 26, 10:15 am, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
> > >http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > - Show quoted text - |
| drceephd@insightbb.com | 26 May 2009 14:15 |
> >http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Jeff Cancer is still a "mystery" disease for the allopath, and why anyone survives their cut/burn/poison approach is also a mystery. The allopath does not know why chemo works as poorly as it does. Experts in this area report that the correct cure rate for cancer treated allopathically is 2.1%. 2.1% is hardly 85%.
DrCee You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons
|
| Jeff | 26 May 2009 11:04 |
> http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html With Hodgkin's Disease, there is about an 85% chance of survival with proper treatment. The so-called "natural treatments" that the family is trying to use not only are not working in this case (the tumors are getting larger), but, there is no evidence that "natural treatments" work.
The question the court is dealing with is: Does the state have the right to force treatment on a child with a disease that has a 85% survival rate when the family wants to do nothing?
In this case, the courts are ruling not to give the kid chemotherapy is medical neglect.
Jeff
|
| john | 26 May 2009 05:31 |
http://www.whale.to/a/quack.html
|
Quick links: