Sorry, Toots, but I was told by this guy under a rock, that you are the
chief.

Sure they can.

But people like you

Now, Carole, why would you say that? Oh, that's right, because you cannot
prove any of your whacko conspiracies.

Well, I am put here to say that you are a french fry short of a happy meal.

"M*a*r*k P*r*o*b*e*r*t-October 7, 2004" <M*a*r*k P*r*o*b*e*r*t 10-7-04@lambercartel.com> wrote in message news:<HTi9d.20402

No thats your job.
I don't claim that any of my conspiracy ideas are conclusive, but they
sure can't be knocked out of the equation either. But people like you
just assume that the conspiracy ideas have absolutely no footing, but
the status quo, the established science is sacred, that "experts" are
all right and shouldn't be questioned because they have a string of
letters after their names.
Sorry dude, I'm here to say I disagree and that these "experts" are
illuminati dupes, put in place to uphold perverted science and are
happy to do it because they get paid big bucks and get lots of
prestige and that's all they care about.

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/rationality.htm

news:<h9W5d.5542$NS1.2476644@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...

Oh, you mean like the Conspiracies to Undermine Rational Thought? Are you
the leader?

Ever occur to you that you are one mind controlled dude? Conspiracies
do exist and if a person can't even acknowledge the possibility, they
have a problem.

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/conspiracy.htm
"Most people have built in 'slides' that short circuit the
mind&#8217;s critical examination process when it comes to certain
sensitive topics. 'Slides' is a CIA term for a conditioned type of
response which dead-ends a person&#8217;s thinking, and terminates
debate or examination of the topic. For example, the mention of the
word 'conspiracy' usually solicits a slide response with many people."
--Fritz Springmeier, author of The Top 13 Illuminati Bloodlines and
de-programmer http://www.newworldpeace.com/911menu3.html

Well, at least Carole has you for company. That makes me feel better.

Actually, we do not have a democracy in the truest sense of the idea. At
best, we have a representative democracy.

So? This point is as old as some of Jan's citations.

Non-sequitur. None of the above points are relevant to your bullshit claim.

Not quite.  We all live in it.

The Americans were given a Republic.  Now they have a democracy.  Not even
nearly the same thing.

The American money was once backed by gold and silver.  Today it is backed by a
promise from a private corporation, the Federal reserve bank.  You know, an I O
U of a type.

The American medical system is based upon a medical fruad.  That is that germs
cause disease.  The results are very profitable, yet none the less laughable.

DrC PhD

What a sad paranoid world you live in.

Yes, I do miss this place here and there. Most, if not all, the people
I deal with (those closest to me) tend to avoid dealing with issues
and respond emotionally if pushed on certain topics.

So the internet is the only place where a person can get information
and feedback on issues. I used to be called argumentative as a child
which used to annoy people. I get equally frustrated when people avoid
dealing with issues - but that's life.

I actually think the soil theory is correct. I believe that if people
didn't have any deficiencies, they wouldn't have health problems.
Certain things rob the body of minerals e.g., acid causing foods
(meat, sugar etc), chemicals and heavy metals which the body uses up
resources to eliminate.

I haven't got an overactive imagination and it is a fact that there is
a conspiracy behind every facet of our lives. You give me a topic and
I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion,
government, health etc.

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/conspiracy.htm

Carole
http://

You should drop by more often, Carole -- this quotation is as phoney
as a false leg.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Soil Theory vs Germ Theory - 150 years of suppression

From my own experience I have discovered that the soil theory is
valid.

Soil theory maintains that GERMS, FUNGII and PARASITES 
only thrive in a toxic body - and the root cause of all disease is 
CELLULAR TOXEMIA. 

"The germ theory proposes you get rid of the flies, while it makes
more sense to clean up the garbage attracting them."  
--Bill Nelson, developer of the QXCI machine

"If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that
germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue - rather than being
the cause of the diseased tissue."  -- Rudolph Virchow (1821-1902)

"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu  
[the environment within] is everything."  
-  Louis Pasteur  (on his deathbed)

"Many forms of diagnosis are dependent upon what germ life exists, and
its existence in the body usually indicates a bad state of
deterioration. Disease germs are nature's undertakers"  
- -- Bernard Jenson, The Science and Practise of Iridology

"... depending on its inner state, germs arose within the body itself
that, in Rife&#8217;s opinion, were not the cause but the result of
disease states." 
--150 Years of Suppression, by Christopher Bird 1991

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm