Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Re: The germ theory vs the soil theory

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MedKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: The germ theory vs the soil theory

Michele24 Sep 2004 19:52
> > You give me a topic and
> > I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion,
> > government, health etc.
>
> What a sad paranoid world you live in.

Suddenly, her binge drinking makes sense.......

M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 24, 200424 Sep 2004 14:28
> You give me a topic and
> I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion,
> government, health etc.

What a sad paranoid world you live in.

Carole24 Sep 2004 00:16
> >"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu  
> >[the environment within] is everything."  
> >-  Louis Pasteur  (on his deathbed)
>
> You should drop by more often, Carole -- this quotation is as phoney
> as a false leg.

Yes, I do miss this place here and there. Most, if not all, the people
I deal with (those closest to me) tend to avoid dealing with issues
and respond emotionally if pushed on certain topics.

So the internet is the only place where a person can get information
and feedback on issues. I used to be called argumentative as a child
which used to annoy people. I get equally frustrated when people avoid
dealing with issues - but that's life.

I actually think the soil theory is correct. I believe that if people
didn't have any deficiencies, they wouldn't have health problems.
Certain things rob the body of minerals e.g., acid causing foods
(meat, sugar etc), chemicals and heavy metals which the body uses up
resources to eliminate.

I haven't got an overactive imagination and it is a fact that there is
a conspiracy behind every facet of our lives. You give me a topic and
I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion,
government, health etc.

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/conspiracy.htm

Carole
http://

>   -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
>      These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
>        "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
>            were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)

David Wright23 Sep 2004 03:47
>"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu??
>[the environment within]?is everything."??
>-  Louis Pasteur  (on his deathbed)

You should drop by more often, Carole -- this quotation is as phoney
as a false leg.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Carole22 Sep 2004 11:51
Soil Theory vs Germ Theory - 150 years of suppression

From my own experience I have discovered that the soil theory is
valid.

Soil theory maintains that GERMS, FUNGII and PARASITES 
only thrive in a toxic body - and the root cause of all disease is 
CELLULAR TOXEMIA. 

"The germ theory proposes you get rid of the flies, while it makes
more sense to clean up the garbage attracting them."  
--Bill Nelson, developer of the QXCI machine

"If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that
germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue - rather than being
the cause of the diseased tissue."  -- Rudolph Virchow (1821-1902)

"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu  
[the environment within] is everything."  
-  Louis Pasteur  (on his deathbed)

"Many forms of diagnosis are dependent upon what germ life exists, and
its existence in the body usually indicates a bad state of
deterioration. Disease germs are nature's undertakers"  
- -- Bernard Jenson, The Science and Practise of Iridology

"... depending on its inner state, germs arose within the body itself
that, in Rife’s opinion, were not the cause but the result of
disease states." 
--150 Years of Suppression, by Christopher Bird 1991

Carole
http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.