Hi,
Two years ago I was hit by accident in the eye, which resulted in a
black eye and scratched cornea. But after my eye healed back I started
noticing strange effects at night or in poor lighting. Basically, I
see "lines" or "starbursts" around light sources. These effects are
still present and have not diminished since my injury. More
specifically, I see three "spikes" that are always at the same angles
but of varying length (depending on the lighting and if my eye is
dry/tired).
I've read a lot of posts about these sort of effects from post-LASIK
patients. However I cannot find any information on starburst effect
resulting from a natural injury. I have two possible explanations for
my condition:
1- Either my cornea "scarred" unevenly and distorsts the light, or
2- My pupil has permanently dilated because of the strong blow I
received.
This last explanation came from my ophtalmologist after I mentionned
these effets. He said that nothing could be done if that was the case.
I am young (21) and wear no glasses. However this problem is starting
to annoy me more and more, especially when night driving. Sometimes I
am scared because of all those lines in my visual field, it distracts
me and I lose my concentration on the road. Also, I now hate watching
TV because I always notice how my vision is distorted. This problem is
really starting to drag me down, I've lived more than two years with
it and I want to move on. I can't make my mind that I'm stuck with
this for the rest of my life. I'm still young and I have perfect sight
apart from this.
Do anybody have any explanation/possible treatments for my condition?
Thank you, it would be very appreciated.
Oliver
Jan - 29 Mar 2004 11:08 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> This last explanation came from my ophtalmologist after I mentionned
> these effets. He said that nothing could be done if that was the case.
Oliver,
I suppose the ophthalmologist also mentioned to you that there is or is not
a scar or irregularity.?
He also confirmed pupil abnormalities?
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
Dr. Leukoma - 29 Mar 2004 13:58 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Oliver
Your cornea needn't have developed a visible scar to refract the light
unevenly. It need only have taken on an a slighlty irregular shape.
Anyway, what really jumped out at me in your post was that your
ophthalmologist apparently offered an explanation without having seen
you??? The entire matter could be answered with a simple comprehensive eye
examination. Why don't you start there?
DrG
SomeDude - 29 Mar 2004 20:19 GMT
> Anyway, what really jumped out at me in your post was that your
> ophthalmologist apparently offered an explanation without having seen
> you??? The entire matter could be answered with a simple comprehensive eye
> examination. Why don't you start there?
No, my ophtamologist saw me. He did a complete eye exam and apparently
everything was fine. It's only after I told him my night vision
problems that he said that. He measured the diameter of my pupil
compared to my other one. He said that it MIGHT be bigger than normal,
although he didn't seem absolutely positive. If I recall (that was 2
years ago), I think he said my pupil was maybe 1 mm larger than the
other. But I remember wery well him saying that if that was the case
nothing could be done about it. He didn't give me more info.
I'd like to know the name of this condition (pupil dilation after a
blow) so I could do some research on the topic. So far I found nothing
helpful on the web.
Oliver
Jan - 29 Mar 2004 20:38 GMT
> > Anyway, what really jumped out at me in your post was that your
> > ophthalmologist apparently offered an explanation without having seen
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Oliver
Focus on the cornea Oliver.
You may try for yourself.
Make yourself a pinhole and try to find out what happens if you slowly move
it (close) in front if the suffering eye.
When your "spikes" disappear in some positions, it is likely you have a
cornea irregularity.
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
Dr. Leukoma - 30 Mar 2004 04:56 GMT
>> Anyway, what really jumped out at me in your post was that your
>> ophthalmologist apparently offered an explanation without having seen
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Oliver
The name of the condition is anisocoria if the pupil still reacts to light
and accommodation. Otherwise, it is called a tonic(Adies) pupil if it
doesn't react at all.
DrG
Jan - 30 Mar 2004 20:31 GMT
> >> Anyway, what really jumped out at me in your post was that your
> >> ophthalmologist apparently offered an explanation without having seen
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> and accommodation. Otherwise, it is called a tonic(Adies) pupil if it
> doesn't react at all.
An Adies still constrict to near IMHO (the near reflex) but slow.
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
> DrG