Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Bates Method: a very useful summary

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Winston Wombat - 22 Jan 2004 01:37 GMT
OK this review is a bit dated (1956)but it gives a good account in a
scientific manner, so even the "idiots" can follow it!

http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/bates.html

Rishi, I await your comments with "batesed" breath!

Winston
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 22 Jan 2004 08:28 GMT
> OK this review is a bit dated (1956)but it gives a good account in a
> scientific manner, so even the "idiots" can follow it!
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Winston

Please, this topic has already been very much discussed in the past,
search for archives.

I invite you to visit www.sistemabates.it and get a translation from
Google or something.

Then I invite you to by my published books of Bates, see link here
Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/
Frostypaw - 23 Jan 2004 10:03 GMT
> Please, this topic has already been very much discussed in the past,
> search for archives.

No kidding.

Isn't spamming of newsgroups with adverts for commercial services
still considered very poor netiquette?

> Then I invite you to by my published books of Bates, see link here
> Please visit
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and if you are interested, join the group
> http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 23 Jan 2004 10:14 GMT
>>Please, this topic has already been very much discussed in the past,
>>search for archives.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Isn't spamming of newsgroups with adverts for commercial services
> still considered very poor netiquette?

I offer you to understand better your vision system and you talk me
about netiquette?

Don't you feel a little bit stupid?

Signature

Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

Frostypaw - 23 Jan 2004 16:12 GMT
> I offer you to understand better your vision system and you talk me
> about netiquette?
>
> Don't you feel a little bit stupid?

No. Because you didn't "offer me to" anything, you're trying to sell
your commercial product. Sod off and find an advertising agency.
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 23 Jan 2004 16:21 GMT
>>I offer you to understand better your vision system and you talk me
>>about netiquette?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> No. Because you didn't "offer me to" anything, you're trying to sell
> your commercial product. Sod off and find an advertising agency.
By the way, in the website of the Idiot David, which is
www.iblindness.org (I is for Idiot) you can download a OCR HTML copy of
the book I sell, so the problem is not commercial, but of intelligence.

Signature

Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

Simon Dean - 23 Jan 2004 16:32 GMT
> By the way, in the website of the Idiot David, which is
> www.iblindness.org (I is for Idiot) you can download a OCR HTML copy of
> the book I sell, so the problem is not commercial, but of intelligence.

Thanks for that link actually Rishi. I'll read that first definately,
and that is a promise, before I decide to believe Bates, You, or even
bother to buy the book.

Cya
Simon
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 23 Jan 2004 16:44 GMT
> Thanks for that link actually Rishi. I'll read that first definately,
> and that is a promise, before I decide to believe Bates, You, or even
> bother to buy the book.

Please, don't decide anything, just let things happen.
Discard glasses for a while and wait and see.

Signature

Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

Simon Dean - 23 Jan 2004 16:52 GMT
>> Thanks for that link actually Rishi. I'll read that first definately,
>> and that is a promise, before I decide to believe Bates, You, or even
>> bother to buy the book.
>
> Please, don't decide anything, just let things happen.
> Discard glasses for a while and wait and see.

You obviously suffer from a lot of mental strain Rishi. I can see how
this book might be of help to you in helping to relieve that. Since I
dont know how many times I must mention it, I dont wear glasses, I dont
wear contacts, I havent had surgery, I havent read the book, I have
20/20 vision.

But I shall read the book. See what it says, investigate its usefulness
and research it, and in those acts, shall I have decided as to its
usefulness.

Cya
Simon
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 23 Jan 2004 17:07 GMT
> wear contacts, I havent had surgery, I havent read the book, I have
> 20/20 vision.

Ah, sorry, You were the idiot that having 20/20 was looking for some
glasses...

I forgot!
Simon Dean - 23 Jan 2004 17:09 GMT
>> wear contacts, I havent had surgery, I havent read the book, I have
>> 20/20 vision.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I forgot!

Yes, you were the idiot who forgot and who thought I was looking for
glasses. No, I was the person (not the idiot - learn that Rishi, you
might gain more sales if you treat people with a little more respect), I
was the person who had a slight problem with eye strain and would like
to find out what that problem is.

Hence the idea of going to an optometrist, or the doctor, since I heard
that apparently high blood sugar can lead to a blurry vision problem.
But without finding out what the problem is, it cannot be treated. But
Im not saying what course of action to take for treatment, however you
got confused about that. You think its foolish of me to find out the
cause of my slight eye strain, whatever that might be. I do not think
its foolish because there are some serious problems that blurry
vision/problems focusing can be symptom of.

Cya
Simon
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 23 Jan 2004 17:54 GMT
> Yes, you were the idiot who forgot and who thought I was looking for
> glasses. No, I was the person (not the idiot - learn that Rishi, you
> might gain more sales if you treat people with a little more respect), I
> was the person who had a slight problem with eye strain and would like
> to find out what that problem is.

Sales depend on product not on other things, except marketing. I agree.

But now, what if the book I am here to disseminate in a hardcopy way
REALLY helps you?

What will be your attitude toward me?

Do you think it will change?

Because, if the things I say are really the truth, what will happen?

> Hence the idea of going to an optometrist, or the doctor, since I heard

These ideas are quite wrong, because you have to find one single
optometrist able to help people. There are none. Also for doctors: they
do not know what are they doing, except for very very rare individuals
who function out of intuition, not of so-called science.

> that apparently high blood sugar can lead to a blurry vision problem.

Any excuses are right. But what if they put glasses on you?

> But without finding out what the problem is, it cannot be treated. But
> Im not saying what course of action to take for treatment, however you
> got confused about that. You think its foolish of me to find out the
> cause of my slight eye strain, whatever that might be. I do not think
> its foolish because there are some serious problems that blurry
> vision/problems focusing can be symptom of.

You were the idiot that practice "concentrating", now I remember. Now I
remember the stupid things you did.

Now I understand from what your eyestrain comes from.
Mike Tyner - 23 Jan 2004 13:23 GMT
> Isn't spamming of newsgroups with adverts for commercial services
> still considered very poor netiquette?

The commercials aren't the most offensive aspect.

It's more annoying to be lectured from ignorance. We are repeatedly told all our
textbooks are wrong, by someone who's never read one. This individual couldn't
pass a 9th-grade quiz on anatomy or physiology.

But it's heinous to jump on innocent new posters and blame them for their
problems, calling them "stupid" in an attempt to persuade us that the book he
sells is the "one true way".

The only bright side is knowing his abusive and fallacious arguments HURT his
book sales.

-MT
Rishi Giovanni Gatti - 23 Jan 2004 13:41 GMT
>>Isn't spamming of newsgroups with adverts for commercial services
>>still considered very poor netiquette?
>
> The commercials aren't the most offensive aspect.
It's just culture promoting!

> It's more annoying to be lectured from ignorance. We are repeatedly told all our
> textbooks are wrong, by someone who's never read one. This individual couldn't
> pass a 9th-grade quiz on anatomy or physiology.

Excuse me: are you able to cure presbyopia?
Are you able to cure any disease of the eyes?

The answers are easy: no, no.

You are unable to do anything good for the patient. patients are so
desperate that resort to such tortures as contact lenses and surgical
dramas like lasik lasek prk... You name all.

> But it's heinous to jump on innocent new posters and blame them for their
> problems, calling them "stupid" in an attempt to persuade us that the book he
> sells is the "one true way".

I maybe wrong in saying "one true way". But is absolutely TRUE tha YOUR
WAYS are COMPLETELY OF NO BENEFIT to the patient.

> The only bright side is knowing his abusive and fallacious arguments HURT his
> book sales.

I have to hurt so that those who are intelligent but sleeping may wake
up and see with their own eyes what is the truth.

But, people who wear glasses are already deeply hurt.

Those who undergone laser are SO MUCH HURT that what I say will pass
away and they will remain untouched. such is the trauma they have
experienced that I think my "abuse" is really nothing.

Ask to any patient if they are happy with their glasses. they will
answer "no, but the doctor said...".

What is really strange is that you being a glasses prescriptor... What
can I expect from you? You will never accept any second or third
opinion! You are well protected by your own beliefs, you are not
scientific at all.

Again I repeat: the truth about vision is at hand. There is not much to
do to recognize it, just a little bit of patience and the willingness to
discard glasse for few hours and let the eye rest a little bit
practicing mental trick anybody can learn.

A scientific mind should be interested in these facts.

An idiotic mind won't.

Signature

Please visit
http://www.stores.ebay.it/juppiterconsultingrishi
and you can buy a replica of the Original Dr. Bates book
"Perfect Sight Without Glasses"
and if you are interested, join the group
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/PerfectSight/

Revival - 31 Mar 2008 22:19 GMT

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.