Subject: Optometry is not medicine, or medical practice.
Charles Prentice: Hail to the 'Father of Optometry'
Charles Prentice's pioneering studies in optics earned him the praise
of prominent ophthalmologists at home and abroad. But his status as a
leading refracting optician also inspired contempt among medical
doctors who regarded Mr. Prentice's trade as a threat to medicine.
Like him or not, turn-of-the-century eye doctors could hardly deny Mr.
Prentice's monumental impact on vision care. The man AOA dubbed the
"Father of Optometry" is the subject of this month's "Visionaries," a
yearlong series on influential people in optometry's past.
Trained as a mechanical engineer in Germany, Mr. Prentice applied his
knowledge of math and physics to the field of optics. In 1890, his
papers on the "Law of Decentration" and "A Metric System of Numbering
and Measuring Prisms" won him a worldwide reputation as a brilliant
innovator.
In addition to his scientific endeavors, Mr. Prentice spearheaded
efforts to organize, regulate, and educate O.D.s in the profession's
nascence.
Mr. Prentice and a handful of others formed the Optical Society of the
State of New York in 1895, in part to counter M.D.s who accused
refracting opticians of violating medical practice laws.
In 1896, Mr. Prentice drafted and lobbied for a bill that eventually
became New York State's optometry law. Mr. Prentice successfully
argued that fitting glasses constituted the treatment of light, not
disease, and so did not infringe upon medicine's purview.
In 1910, Mr. Prentice persuaded Columbia University to establish an
optometry program. He devised the curriculum, chose instructors, and
lectured frequently.
A 1929 editorial in The Optometric Weekly noted, "It is the
achievements of men like Charles Prentice that have made present day
optometry possible." An editorial in today's press might say the same.
Neil Brooks - 01 Jul 2009 15:48 GMT
> Subject: Optometry is not medicine, or medical practice.
Per usual, you ignore things that genuinely DO matter, and focus on
stuff that ... people really couldn't care less about.
Maybe if you had understood, and focused on, what really mattered ...
you wouldn't have left your poor niece, Joy Benson, so damned myopic.
http://www.chinamyopia.org/otis%20&joy.htm
Jan - 01 Jul 2009 22:05 GMT
Otis schreef:
> Subject: Optometry is not medicine, or medical practice.
If you read carefully Otis, you should have noticed optometry did start
with refraction done by opticians who know their stuff.
Opticians who NEVER have prescribed minus glasses to people who didn't
need it.
In those day's the opticians where technicians as they are until now
BTW, opticians in my country (The Netherlands) still are refracting and
prescribing, 95% of the prescriptions are performed by opticians.
Later on optometry developed to a more diagnostic medical profession, in
your and my country.
Please show me where in your story below I could find the statement you
made in the header "Optometry is not medicine, or medical practice".
The only statement I saw is "refraction done by opticians" is not
medical practice, which indeed is correct.
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
PS, I assume Otis shall not respond in a direct way.
> Charles Prentice: Hail to the 'Father of Optometry'
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> achievements of men like Charles Prentice that have made present day
> optometry possible." An editorial in today's press might say the same.