Bill,

Did you notice that -- apparently -- Otis has removed his original
post??

This is another part of his insane M.O.:

EVERYTHING he posts is inane and ridiculous, but ... even HE has a
"lunacy threshold," and ... when he exceeds it ... he'll remove the
post.

The guy's an ab-so-lute idiot.

Dear Bill,

The issues is your demand for proof in a sharply defined context.

No Einstein in fact described his theory as "Heuristic", which means
that INITIALLY he could not offer PROOF, but the concept had to come
first.

He did this in his 1905 papers.  Only long after, was the "proof"
finally developed, and you had to undertstand his concept FIRST before
there could be any discussion of "proof".

Only by your changing the context could you talk about proof.  Yes the
weight change is so small, that it can not be measured.  In THEORY the
change
is their, but you can't measurement.

You need to define the CONTEXT of the test -- to get an accurate
measurement.  This is OFTEN the case in science, and scientific
analysis.

But back to you demand for a clear "yes or no" answer -- to a question
you feel is obvious
Let us assume that you demand that I tell you if light travels in
"waves" or by "particles".

The answer depends on the opinion of the person you ask.

There is no yes or no answer.

Same as preventing entry into a negative STATE for the fundamental
eye.

There are NO easy yes or no answer.

Second-opinion best,

Otis