 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2009Eye Care Professional Clears Vision from -3.5 diopters.
The second-opinion optometrists have worked out a method to clear THEIR OWN VISION. Here is one that cleared her vision from -3.5 doipters (Snellen worse than 20/20, or the line that is defined at "Legal Blindness") http://www.optometrists.org/Boston/articles.html But the idea is to stop it before it starts -- as August did -- and save all the trouble. After all, who do you believe? A highly qulified and compassionate professional like Dr. Orfield, or some bone-head who posting here that has no clue about any of science and preventive optometry and ophthalmology? Preventive second-opinion best, On Jun 1, 9:09 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote: > After all, who do you believe? A highly qulified and compassionate > professional like Dr. Orfield, or some bone-head who posting here that > has no clue about any of science and preventive optometry and > ophthalmology? Rather than being so hard on yourself, perhaps you should simply go away. Just a thought. How come it doesn't achieve these results in controlled trials? Are you aware of the difference between accommodative and axial-length myopia? I reduced MY myopia by several diopters, too, through the use of Atropine ... but the underlying axial length Rx never changed. How DO you account for that? Why IS your niece a myope with a restricted drivers license? Why WEREN'T you able to do ANYTHING about your own myopia ... other than have cataract surgery? Hmmmm. On Jun 1, 11:09 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote: > The second-opinion optometrists have worked out a method to clear > THEIR OWN VISION. > > Here is one that cleared her vision from -3.5 doipters (Snellen worse > than 20/20, or the line that is defined at "Legal Blindness") I suppose you meant unaided vision of 20/200 not 20/20. In either case, it is not Legal Blindness, Legal Blindness is defined as aided acuity. Myopia of -3.50 with corrected acuity of 20/20 is not legal blindness. Judy On Jun 2, 8:42 am, mpac...@rogers.com wrote: > On Jun 1, 11:09 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Judy For the record, I believe you've attempted to enlighten him on this dozens of times. Otis believes (among other things) that if he can gain control over the terminology, then he can make his arguments correct. But ... he's a damned fool, so... > For the record, I believe you've attempted to enlighten him on this > dozens of times. > > Otis believes (among other things) that if he can gain control over > the terminology, then he can make his arguments correct. For the record, otis INVENTS a terminology, usually. I still wonder whether according to Otis I have FUNDAMENTAL eye(s) or any type of eye (s)... > For the record, otis INVENTS a terminology, usually. I still wonder > whether according to Otis I have FUNDAMENTAL eye(s) or any type of eye > (s)... Too, too true. Another wonderful example is HIS notion of the "dynamic eye." While ALL of us understand that -- literally -- eyes are dynamic ... Uncle Otie has steadfastly refused to/is utterly incapable of answering the simple question: then why weren't YOU, (scr)Otis, able to do ANYTHING about your six diopters of myopia (apart from cataract surgery)? [I guess refractive lens exchange is now a bona fide Natural Vision Improvement method ....] If the eye works as HE says ... or if Natural Vision Improvement methods are effective ... one can only wonder why HIS vision was so, so crappy. [Was it laziness? Inadequate intellect? Which of these things doomed Joy Benson to myopia?] But now we're just talking about the pathology of a guy who -- as a child -- dreamed of commercial aviation (and couldn't even help his niece.....). Right, Uncle Otie?? http://www.chinamyopia.org/otis%20&joy.htm |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.