Video on Myopia Prevention

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 30 May 2009 19:13 GMT

While the majority-opinion maintains that preventing a negative STATE
for the fundamental eye is IMPOSSIBLE, there are other highly
qualified ophthalmologists who support plus-prevention as the second-
opinion.

Here is the video of that advocacy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSvu_6P6AmU

and here is a highly qualifed MEDICAL DOCTOR and Ph.D. who sees the
wisdom in true-prevention.

http://www.kaisuviikari.com/

Enjoy their judgment,

Reply to this Message

Ms.Brainy - 30 May 2009 20:35 GMT

On May 30, 11:13 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> While the majority-opinion maintains that preventing a negative STATE
> for the fundamental eye is IMPOSSIBLE, there are other highly
> qualified ophthalmologists who support plus-prevention as the second-
> opinion.
>
> Here is the video of that advocacy.

<<<snip>>>

Yeah, but what about eyes that are not fundamental?

Reply to this Message

Neil Brooks - 30 May 2009 22:13 GMT

On May 30, 12:13 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> While the majority-opinion maintains that preventing a negative STATE
> for the fundamental eye is IMPOSSIBLE,

Liar.

Reply to this Message

Neil Brooks - 30 May 2009 22:16 GMT

On May 30, 12:13 pm, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

> and here is a highly qualifed MEDICAL DOCTOR and Ph.D. who sees the
> wisdom in true-prevention.
>
> http://www.kaisuviikari.com/

By the way .... this person seems to understand the difference between
accommodative and axial-length myopia -- something that you either a)
denied existed, b) didn't understand, or c) both.

And yet ... by referencing this person's site ... you now seem to
endorse the (well-established) concept.

Just when one might believe you've reached the apotheosis of
idiocy ... you find a way to outdo yourself :-)

Reply to this Message

Mike Tyner - 31 May 2009 00:20 GMT

> and here is a highly qualifed MEDICAL DOCTOR and Ph.D. who sees the
> wisdom in true-prevention.

He sounds just like you, Otis!

He also whines a lot, like Bates ("nobody listens to me!")

The Finnish Journal of Medicine won't publish his comments because...

(Please select one of the following:)

a) The great myopia conspiracy
b) He contradicts Parssinen
c) The editors have a personal vendetta
d) His comments offer no new data or meta-analysis

(Checking....)
Yes, I just checked and HYPEROPES STILL ACCOMMODATE MORE THAN MYOPES.

-MT

Reply to this Message

Salmon Egg - 31 May 2009 02:09 GMT

> > and here is a highly qualifed MEDICAL DOCTOR and Ph.D. who sees the
> > wisdom in true-prevention.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> -MT

Why is it not reaoable to expecgt that multiple genes can affect
suxceptibility for myopia and other eye problems. I can bicture mixing
of these genes resulting in multiple subpopulations of humans with
different degrees of responding to close work.

There certainly is a strong correlation between identical twins and the
incidence of scizophrenia. Nevertheless, it appears that DNA is not
everything. Neither is environment,

Note that there is a strong correlatioon of people in the same family
speaking a common language.

I certainly am not aware of all these factors having been teased out
statiscally with respect to myopia.

Bill

Signature

Most people go to college to get their missing high school education.

Reply to this Message