Please don't answer Otis.

He is, after all, nothing but an old, feeble idiot.

Thanks.

On Sep 17, 12:17 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:

can't resist posting your lies again, huh Otis?

for those who don't know, Otis is a mentally-imbalanced zealot who has
fantasy notions that he understands the science around the development
of near-sightedness in humans better than anyone else.  the trouble
is, Otis disregards the current research data and instead clings to
old "voodoo-science" that was practiced by a few zealot clinicians in
the 50's and 60's.  the real data doesn't support anything Otis says--
but he doesn't care.  he likes to quote animal studies on chickens and
shrews, and he embraces personal success stories as if they are
proof.  The real studies, done by critical university-based
researchers who do control studies and use statistical analysis to
verify their claims, consistently show that Otis is wrong.

BTW, Otis himself wears big thick glasses so why would anyone believe
what he has to say anyway?  And when he forced his theory upon his
young niece Joy when she was growing up, and made her follow all his
so-called "rules" to eliminate myopia, it didn't work-- she still
needs glasses.

ignor Otis.  just go away Otis troll.

s