Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Multifocal Contacts: RGP Vs. Soft...?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
toddster63 - 16 Apr 2008 17:04 GMT
I have tried soft multifocals (ProClear and Purevision), and didn't
care for the compromise in vision--the simultaneous vision worked
okay, but it was definitely a compromise. I think one of the problems
may have been too that neither of these multifocals corrected for my
astigmatism (I have around 1 diopter correction for both sphere and
cylinder per eye).

I am wondering if RGP multifocals (particularly the new Synergeyes
with dual near center) would be any better? Particularly if they have
cylinder correction for my astigmatism...?

It seems to me that simultaneous vision is going to be simultaneous
vision to the brain, regardless of the material of the lenses, but you
hear how much better GP designs and materials are at multifocals...?
Jan - 16 Apr 2008 20:23 GMT
toddster63 schreef:
> I have tried soft multifocals (ProClear and Purevision), and didn't
> care for the compromise in vision--the simultaneous vision worked
> okay, but it was definitely a compromise. I think one of the problems
> may have been too that neither of these multifocals corrected for my
> astigmatism (I have around 1 diopter correction for both sphere and
> cylinder per eye).

Ask for the Proclear Multifocal with astigmatism correction.
Never the less, still a compromise and still a simultaneously working
system.

> I am wondering if RGP multifocals (particularly the new Synergeyes
> with dual near center) would be any better? Particularly if they have
> cylinder correction for my astigmatism...?

Most RGP lenses are correcting a small amount off astigmatism, it
depends on the relation between the amount of astigmatism due to
differences in curvature in two directions of the cornea and the amount
of astigmatism in refraction error.

BTW, not all bi/multi focal RGP's are designed as simultaneous viewing
lenses.
Ask your professional.

>  It seems to me that simultaneous vision is going to be simultaneous
> vision to the brain, regardless of the material of the lenses, but you
> hear how much better GP designs and materials are at multifocals...?

There are other designs instead of the simultaneously, troubling the
brains less sometimes.

Hope this helps,

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
Don W - 17 Apr 2008 04:59 GMT
Jan or anyone,

 Can you steer me to where the optics of these lenses (equations) are
described?
 Thanks.

Don W.
Jan - 18 Apr 2008 21:15 GMT
Don W schreef:
> Jan or anyone,
>
>   Can you steer me to where the optics of these lenses (equations) are
> described?

http://www.coopervision.com/us/patient_aboutus_news.asp?id=41

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.