Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2008
Interesting Conversation
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Zetsu - 10 Apr 2008 13:19 GMT This afternoon me and Andrew Judd shared an interested little chat on Yahoo Instant Messenger. I think he was slightly frustrated at the end because he was using a lot of cursing against me! Anyway, I shall post it here for the interest of the reader.
--------------------------
Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:13:09 PM): hello Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:13:16 PM): it's me, zetsu Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:13:20 PM): Sup andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:13:41 PM): i am busy at the moment......we can arrange a time though Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:13:45 PM): sure no prob Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:01 PM): are you mad at Mike Tyner and niel Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:04 PM): lol Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:10 PM): they mock you andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:14:11 PM): they dont exist for now... Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:14 PM): hehe Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:35 PM): andrew, i disagree with your theories, but i do respect how you are so determined Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:40 PM): in your work Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:14:48 PM): Well, so am I. We all have to be, huh Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:15:05 PM): I watched ur videos andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:15:11 PM): if we want normal sight we need to compare what we imagine with what is real Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:15:16 PM): quite cool - even if THEY'rE COMPLETELY WRONG imo andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:15:34 PM): being determined can cause myopia Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:15:49 PM): sometimes, I just don't get what you're talking about.. i mean you talk in such a mystical way Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:15:53 PM): couldn't you just talk normaly andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:16:03 PM): we need to arrange another time....sorry. i have to go Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:16:03 PM): otherwise i struggle to understand u Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:16:08 PM): OKK Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:16:10 PM): laterz andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:16:18 PM): i am happy to talk to you via phone Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:16:23 PM): Lol andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:16:31 PM): i am not a mystical person Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:16:38 PM): you give that impression andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:16:44 PM): just straight forwards and ordinary Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:17:27 PM): OK sorry to distrub u but I just got one more question: are you gona' come back on sci.med.vision? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:17:36 PM): it gets boring when there's no one to argue with Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:17:44 PM): id love to argue with you there andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:19:30 PM): talk to me later.....i had to go for now Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:19:38 PM): see ya! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:19:52 PM): TAKE CARE - - and stay off the beer eh? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:19:53 PM): lol andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:20:45 PM): i am by the way not all interested in arguing.......if people want the words of bates clarified thqat is one thing but i am not goign to argue about it.........why should i? people can have their wrong headed beliefs.......i cannot change what they insist on believing Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:20:57 PM): good point andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:21:13 PM): "When they learn, by actual demonstration of the facts, just how their visual defects are produced, they unconsciously avoid the unconscious strain which causes them" "It is obtained only during moments of relaxation, and retained only as long as the causes of strain are avoided; but how this is accomplished cannot be fully explained, just as many other psychological phenomena cannot be explained." "It has also been demonstrated that for every error of refraction there is a different kind of strain." andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:21:55 PM): http://www.central-fixation.com/bem/bettereyesight_1920_08.htm#contagious "For an error of refraction is simply a nervous condition, and there is nothing more contagious than nervousness. A person with myopia, hypermetropia, or astigmatism, is a person under a strain. This strain shows in his voice, his walk, his manner, and makes the people with whom he comes in contact nervous. These people then develop errors of refraction, temporarily if the influence is temporary, and permanently if the influence is permanent, as in the case of children who cannot escape from their nervous teachers and parents. Endless illustrations of this fact could be given. A few must suffice." And elsewhere: "the strain which causes the one condition is different from that which produces the other. Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:22:13 PM): yeah andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:23:55 PM): so why you think i am wrong is beyond me andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:24:32 PM): all i know for a fact is you believe i am wrong. But i am entirelly clueless as to what is wrong Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:25:47 PM): You may be right or you may be wrong, I am not concerned. But I feel that the way you present the Bates method is distorting and untrue to the real spirit of Bates - which is to retain absolute simplicity. There is nothing complicated about the cure of imperfect sight. To complicate things is an error. To simplify is an aid in securing rest. Therefore simplicity = cure. Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:26:30 PM): The way you talk about bates makes it sound so complicated - personality blah blah - but really it's a very simple matter of securing relaxation 24/7 by the procedures which bates has already written about Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:26:38 PM): there's no need to invent new theories - theories are always wrong of course andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:26:53 PM): i have no f.cking theories!!!!! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:26:53 PM): Bates has done the work for us - now it's just a matter of following what he recommends and get on with it Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:26:59 PM): It seems you do have theories andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:27:01 PM): go to hell Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:27:09 PM): Chill Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:27:26 PM): Theories are just theories until you prove them as fact - which bates has done andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:27:26 PM): just go f.ck off and live your life and leave me the f.ck alone andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:27:40 PM): thats the relaxing choice Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:27:42 PM): Calm down, man. I am not attacking you personally - just your life andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:27:44 PM): dont try to change me!!! andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:27:47 PM): change yoruself Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:27:48 PM): just your ideas* i meant andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:28:13 PM): you dont get it do you?? you are the f.cking enemy!! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:28:18 PM): Why? andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:28:35 PM): you are clueless as to what BAtes meant by relaxation Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:28:44 PM): How so? andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:29:55 PM): what did Bates mean by relaxation. Give me a definition please Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:30:19 PM): when the mind is free from strain and effort and the stare- that is relaxation - not some personality changing crap andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:32:39 PM): how do you imagine that if a person has an abnormal condition of their own minds so that it affects they walk and talk and act and affects all those it comes in contact with that they can resolve that without it visibly changing the way they interact with other people???????????????? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:33:24 PM): the personality changes and the way one interacts and behaves - these are merely a side affect of the cure of imerpfect sight] andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:33:26 PM): ok i am now free to talk to you Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:33:43 PM): the methods of rest will have this affect AS WELL AS improving the vision Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:33:51 PM): they happen simulataneously Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:34:02 PM): there is no need to manually go about changing one's personality andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:34:04 PM): if you imagine you can go on being the same person you were that affects all people you come into contact with by swinging or palming then you are delusional Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:34:05 PM): that's the HARD way] Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:34:08 PM): take the EASY way Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:34:33 PM): I do believe so. I don't think I am delusional because many of the bates practioners, including me and Jason Sperry , have had this exact experience andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:34:40 PM): people who dont get quick cures are holding onto their wrong way of being Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:34:43 PM): our personalaity changes along with our eyesight andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:35:03 PM): i am not talking to people who have been successful Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:35:08 PM): people who don't get quick cures are simply still straining and have not learnt how to maintain rest in the mind 24/7 - simple as that Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:35:17 PM): nothing to do with personality andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:35:18 PM): i am talking to people who have not been successfull Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:35:27 PM): I see andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:35:57 PM): people who dispite endless certainty and endlessly believing they understand Bates still do not have normal eyesight Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:36:13 PM): OK andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:36:45 PM): These people want to keep their old way of being. they resist relaxation Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:37:06 PM): personally, I don't think anyone 'understands' BATES fully. it's not necessary to understand HIM! it's only necessary to understand the METHODS and keep practicing diligently until you reach the permanent cure. that's all andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:37:10 PM): But the way of being that is wrong is visible to the outside world Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:38:00 PM): ok Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:38:45 PM): hey andrew I don't want to intrude on your personal life but I am just wondering - what's your profession Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:38:48 PM): are you an Enginner? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:39:17 PM): coz the way you talk about Bridges and nuts and bolts and things makes you sound like one, Lol andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:39:25 PM): that is where you are wrong i believe. a logically minded myopic person thinks that only methods or details need to be done..............a holistic person realises what they are wantingt to achieve........ a mind at rest behaving in a normal manner as oppposed to a wrong way as for example all these c.nts who say they are teachers and who are too cowardly to reveal their eyes are as f.cked as the next person who is wanting to learn........who they expect to be paid to learn what thye cannot understand themselves...........that is WRONG thinking. That is LYING. Bates made a direct connectiong between LYING AND MYOPIA Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:39:44 PM): ok andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:39:57 PM): i am attempting to talk to people who are often very left brained............. Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:40:10 PM): So... we have identified exactly where we disagree right there. andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:40:21 PM): i cant f.cking win with you.......i am too sspiritucal and now i am too much an engineer Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:40:36 PM): You basically think there needs to be holistic stuff involvedand personality and I think that there has to be just the practical stuff done Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:40:46 PM): so, that's where we disagree with each other Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:40:48 PM): isnt it andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:40:58 PM): you see the details of the bridge but you dont see the design andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:41:15 PM): you think you can build a bridge from its parts andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:41:35 PM): even if the purpose of the bridge is irrelevant to you Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:41:40 PM): ok Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:41:48 PM): yeah, i read your post about that Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:42:31 PM): hey what's your job . i am just curious ? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:42:36 PM): what do you work as andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:42:49 PM): you seem to have no ability to see the work of Bates in its bigger picture context...........almost certainly you dont have normal vision and almost certainly you are on eof these people who believes he can carry on abusing the f.ck out of people and still get good vision andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:43:15 PM): as of this moment i am a currency trader and retired or something Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:43:22 PM): oh ok cool andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:44:07 PM): but tha tis not me..............i am something different..........just have not got that part worked out Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:44:37 PM): k andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:44:39 PM): i dont understand why people so strongly resist the overarching vision of Bates and why they get bogged down in the ffucking details Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:44:53 PM): i dont understand what you mean Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:45:01 PM): could you reword it Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:45:17 PM): what does ovearching mean andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:45:50 PM): if a person holds onto an abnormal way of relating to people and things and all that they experience no amount of palming is going to fix that.............they have to want to be come normal as oppposed to insisting on being abnormal Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:46:03 PM): oo andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:46:28 PM): the first thing BAtes did was to settle the minds of his clients Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:46:53 PM): yeah he made them demonstrate that things like staring and effort etc. was harmful andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:46:54 PM): so they were calm......he then got them to relax more deeply.........and he asked them to experience their vision andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:47:23 PM): and if necessary he spent months arguing with them to show them what he was meaning andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:47:46 PM): meanwhile ultimately finally he was broken by the f.cking resistance Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:47:47 PM): lol yeah Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:48:06 PM): some people had to wait MONTHS before they realize that staring was harmful hahaha andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:48:27 PM): when you can demonstrate normal sight then you will be credible Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:48:27 PM): the quicker you can realize it = the faster you get cured andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:49:37 PM): meanwhile we have the reality of Bates that a person who has a specific kind of abnormal condition of their mind will have a specific kind of vision rpoblem. and each specific vision problem that is an abnormal condition of the mind can be *taught* andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:50:12 PM): anybody can learn to be myopic.....and anybody can learn how to not be myopic andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:50:28 PM): but nobody can get normal vision if they dont want to learn about their own wrong thinking andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:50:40 PM): wrong thinking is the heart of the problem.....specific wrong thinking Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:50:55 PM): yes, but he also taught that one should not waste time by dwindling over the various manifestations of strain - he said "just take off your glasses, get on with the cure by rest methods and don't argue" he never said nothing about personality needing to be changed to bring about cure andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:51:17 PM): strain is a useless thing to even consider..........it is wrong thinking that is the problem Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:51:36 PM): I agree Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:51:49 PM): wrong thinking - the tendency to complicate things . Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:51:58 PM): right thinking -the tendency to simplify andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:52:09 PM): the tendency to seek dissagreement instead of seeking similarity Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:52:19 PM): yes Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:53:22 PM): have you read the bates article - think right? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:53:26 PM): it's one of my favorite Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:53:32 PM): from hes magazines andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:53:34 PM): i am not complicating anything............if some c.nt wants to imagine he is doing it right and spends 20 years doing it his way and he thinks that is right then he can be a c.nt for all i care...........But bates said it was because he is a c.nt that he cant see normally! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:53:49 PM): loll Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:53:59 PM): hehehehe you are a funny guy andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:54:28 PM): my idea is very very simple.....our vision describes us Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:54:35 PM): I see andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:54:51 PM): and when we let go of the old us and embrace the real true realaxed us then we see normally.....why is tha tso f.cking compleagted??? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:55:17 PM): but , if you take a look at the response you are getting, you'd realize that people are finding what you are teaching the very ANTITHESIS of simple. that's my personal observation, I'm not insulting you, just critisizing you. Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:55:38 PM): people have no clue what your talking about Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:55:48 PM): just take a look on the forums , sci. med vision, etc Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:55:52 PM): no one has a bloody clue Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:55:54 PM): what you are saying Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:55:59 PM): it's all a blur andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:56:05 PM): i am talking to an audience who migth want to know why it is that they ave been bates teachers for 20 or m ore years and still cant see well......... Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:56:12 PM): this is the very opposite of what bates taught Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:56:20 PM): he said things in the mostsimple, direct manner possible Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:56:35 PM): lol, I haven't even lived for 20 years yet Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:57:20 PM): I agree that the so called 'Bates teachers" are IDIOTS andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:57:22 PM): yes!!! you have an abnormal condition of your mind and anybody coming into contact with you gets a nervous train and is likely to go blind if they spend time with you...............the guy was onto something..........and he enver even met you. I say the man was great Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:57:59 PM): who? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:58:01 PM): what man andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:58:07 PM): Bates Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:58:09 PM): oo Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:58:27 PM): ok andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:58:38 PM): Bates knew that specific wrong thinking created vision problems andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:58:51 PM): he knew that thinking right was the way forwards out of the blurr Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:59:02 PM): yes, but he also knew that rest methods cured ALL the different vision problems - regardless what kind of strain it was Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:59:15 PM): the strain ceases, INVARIABLY< when rest of the mind by the methods is used and found andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:59:19 PM): no......rest and correct use of the mind Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:59:30 PM): correct use of the mind will come about BY DEFAULT if one rests the mind andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:59:30 PM): you are mixing things up Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:59:37 PM): it is not possible to separate them into two Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:59:43 PM): YOu are mixing things up, andrwe andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 12:59:47 PM): forget about strain. it is a useles idea Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:59:50 PM): they occur simultaneously Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:00 PM): How? It is the ENTIRE cause ofimperfect sight andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:00:11 PM): strain enables peope to imagine they can unstrain themselves..........that is totally wrong Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:15 PM): it's quite a significant idea, I'd think andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:00:33 PM): NO!!!!!!! wrong thinking is the basic idea Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:34 PM): exactly. NOW we are getting somewher!! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:40 PM): you are CORECT! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:46 PM): unstrain is WRGON! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:48 PM): wrong* Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:00:56 PM): you can't unstrain.. you just have to REST lol Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:01:00 PM): it's so easy and simple andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:01:06 PM): and rest alone cannot resolve wrong thinking Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:01:07 PM): theres not much to it Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:01:11 PM): yes it can.. andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:01:13 PM): NO!!!!! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:01:17 PM): YES! lol andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:01:54 PM): The mind has to be used in a normal manner with a particular type of control..............something needs to be understood there Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:02:13 PM): Indeed. and that 'normal manner' will come about BY DEFAULT - when one learns to rest his mind andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:02:20 PM): it is rest and education that is needed Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:02:22 PM): YESS andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:02:23 PM): not just rest Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:02:24 PM): just rest Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:02:37 PM): education iin the methods used to attain rest is needed, yes Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:02:47 PM): and when that rest is achieved, perfect sight comes aboout naturally Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:02:52 PM): nothing more to it Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:03:09 PM): the changes in one's thinking will occur automatically without any effort on your part Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:03:15 PM): they will just happen, unconsciously andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:03:17 PM): so how does a person arrive at this rest state that you seem to be suggesting exists Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:03:21 PM): you don't need to consciously change that Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:03:37 PM): exactly by using the methods which bates has detailed in his 1920 book Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:03:46 PM): if you read the book he talks precisely about that Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:03:56 PM): that's the whole point of 'bates method' isnt it? andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:04:00 PM): dont treat me like i am a c.nt Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:04:07 PM): I'm not attacking you, just your ideas. andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:04:24 PM): do you really imagine i have not read ;the fukcing bates book?????? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:04:35 PM): No. I am simply stating the fact that Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:04:44 PM): you asked: how can one get to this suposed 'rest state; Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:04:51 PM): so I say: you can find out by reading the book Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:04:58 PM): am i not right?? andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:05:05 PM): you are distorting the idea Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:05:07 PM): how andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:05:38 PM): you are taking several thousand words and then picking out one or two words and then imagining the whhole two thoughand words can be forgotten Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:06:01 PM): no... I am taking this: there is one goal - REST Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:06:06 PM): and there are many ways one can accomplish this rest Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:06:13 PM): and those methods are ALREADY DESCRIBED in the book! Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:06:21 PM): therefore, anything new is unnecessray Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:06:31 PM): uneccesary* andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:06:39 PM): the idea is your mind is f.cked up.......and if you can secure a way of unfucking your mind which he said was related to relaxation and removing wrong thinking.......then he said you wont be f.cked up Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:06:56 PM): Yes, I agree Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:07:10 PM): and he's told us HOW to get that 'un***ing Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:07:17 PM): using the rest methods Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:07:55 PM): dont u agree Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:09:04 PM): sori , my internet disconectedd Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:09:10 PM): im back andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:09:19 PM): i see.......so bates said nothing about developing good mental control?????? nothing about being interested in what ;you were looking at?????? nothing about being bored being an abnormal condition of your mind......nothing about learning to use memory and imagination in a controlle dmaner? nothing about lying and myopia??? nothing about nothing it seems accept f.cking rest!!!!!!! your level of undrestanding is low Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:09:50 PM): he said all these things were the MEANS BY WHICH one can attain rest Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:09:57 PM): he didn't say THEY were the END GOAL Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:10:16 PM): imagination, memory, mental control, interest in the things one is looking at, not gettings bored- these are all MEANS Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:10:27 PM): a medium through which one can gain the end result of rest andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:10:56 PM): you see to believe you can condence the whole f.cking book down to rest............so that a person does not even need to have a lifeto see normally.......all they need to do is rest,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,no wonder people think that BAtes was a f.cking idiot!!!!! nobody understands the guy...... Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:11:12 PM): I do indeed believe the whole book can be condensed down to rest andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:11:41 PM): we have nothing to talk about. I dont need to f.cking argue with an idiot like you. I need to rest. Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:11:54 PM): why do you get so worked up , man Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:12:05 PM): chill , like i said i am only critisizing your ideas Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:12:11 PM): why can't you take a bit of critisizm mate andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:12:18 PM): it would be easier if killing people was legal...... Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:12:34 PM): Chill out! all this swearing and insulting accomplished nothing andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:12:39 PM): you are the f.cking enemy of bAtes.......and you iagine you ar the guardian of bates andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:12:54 PM): you are like quackenbush and all the other fucktards Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:12:57 PM): the only way we can progress is by talking sensibly and listening to each other and being friendly and not using BAD WORDS ! andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:13:19 PM): you spend all your f.cking time absing peole.......see what it feels like? Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:13:31 PM): so, you can continue to talk like this ; or you can act your age and be a grown up. Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:13:41 PM): What is this, man? 2 year old behaviour Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:13:56 PM): do you need a dummy or what andrewedwardjudd (4/10/2008 1:13:59 PM): i am 52 when c.nts come along and tell me that i need to agree with themm then they get what is socming Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:14:08 PM): then act like your 52
Zetsu - 10 Apr 2008 13:24 GMT Hatake Kakashi: mind if i post our converstion on sMV Hatake Kakashi: I just think it will be itneresting to the readers Hatake Kakashi: about our opinions and stuff Hatake Kakashi: if it doesnt intrude on your privacy andrewedwardjudd: why do you think private stuff is suitable to a public forum???? Hatake Kakashi: Why do you insult me, Andre Hatake Kakashi: doesn't that go against your theories Hatake Kakashi: I thought you taught people to be kind etc. Hatake Kakashi: affectionate Hatake Kakashi: yet you are anything but kind or affectionate andrewedwardjudd: i dont know where you got the idea Hatake Kakashi: It does seem that way. andrewedwardjudd: if i am teaching people anything it is to allow reality to be revealed to them Hatake Kakashi: OK.. andrewedwardjudd: this idea of rest.......is ok but it needs more meat on it Hatake Kakashi: Well, I've posted it on sci.med.vision so everyone can see. Now you can 'allow reality to be revealed' to you eh? Hatake Kakashi: BYE
BD - 10 Apr 2008 18:49 GMT So to summarize:
--- Hatake Kakashi: mind if i post our converstion on sMV andrewedwardjudd: why do you think private stuff is suitable to a public forum???? Hatake Kakashi: Well, I've posted it on sci.med.vision so everyone can see. ---
So you posted a private conversation to a public forum without explicit permission, huh? And STILL you behave as if you have an OUNCE of credibility.
I agree with Neil - there's something frighteningly close to a pathology at play here.
I'm not a doctor, but I do know Usenet etiquette. And you have just blown it BIG TIME, proving yourself to be completely untrustworthy.
If Bates could speak in here I'm almost positive that he would NOT want you as an advocate.
It's really weird, how someone can't see that they're completely alienating the populace they're ostensibly trying to convince.
Only thing I can figure is that people like that really aren't here to convince - they're here to raise sh*t in the group and stir things up. I really try to hold my tongue and lurk with mild bemusement - but this particular move really sucks. Were I the other person in the conversation, I would never EVER correspond with you again, about ANY topic. And If you indeed posted his real name, that in itself would be a deal breaker.
Congratulations. Based on the available information, you are a prick. Please go to your local proctologist's office to collect your prize.
BD
Zetsu - 10 Apr 2008 19:28 GMT I have posted this conversation because I believe it may be interesting to the readers, not as an attack on Andrew. I think we went through some very good points in the conversation so it helps to put things into picture.
I am not here to convice nor to raise 'sh*t' . Nor to stir things up. Nor am I here to interpret Bates' work.
My objective is to raise awareness to the cure of imperfect sight which has been developed, but sadly, ignored completely and utterly by the mainstream and orthodox professionals.
I don't care if I insult a few people, or trash my own credibility. All I care about is for people to start noticing the Great Work done by Dr. Bates ain the 1920s, and become a little bit curious, and maybe ask some questions and investigate into his work. Then the real fun begins.
Dan Abel - 11 Apr 2008 00:06 GMT In article <2c224b80-531d-41a9-bafb-8c5e417edf4b@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> So to summarize: > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > Only thing I can figure is that people like that really aren't here to > convince - they're here to raise sh*t in the group and stir things up. Sort of like a 15 year old kid?
> I really try to hold my tongue and lurk with mild bemusement - but > this particular move really sucks. Were I the other person in the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Congratulations. Based on the available information, you are a prick. I'm not sure it has that equipment.
> Please go to your local proctologist's office to collect your prize. Based on how much sh.t comes out of it's mouth, I'm *sure* it has that equipment!
 Signature Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel@sonic.net
BD - 11 Apr 2008 00:26 GMT > Sort of like a 15 year old kid? Oh, I didn't know... Okay, well - obviously the rules of adult discourse can't apply in that case. Futile is futile.
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 10 Apr 2008 16:45 GMT Dear Zetsu,
Andrew Judd uses a lot of cursing, against anyone who disagrees with his particular "version" of Bates.
There seems to be a lot of Bates versions out their, and no one agrees on any "version". Perhaps that is more of a problem than you might think.
Bates said a LOT OF THINGS. Some I can agree with -- and some I must question.
But you are well advised to stop taking to anyone who must resort to "cursing" to make his "point".
Because by doing that -- he has most certainly lost his point.
If you get my drift.
Enjoy,
> This afternoon me and Andrew Judd shared an interested little chat on > Yahoo Instant Messenger. I think he was slightly frustrated at the end [quoted text clipped - 181 lines] > > read more » Neil Brooks - 10 Apr 2008 20:51 GMT On Apr 10, 8:45 am, otisbr...@embarqmail.com wrote:
> But you are well advised to stop taking to anyone > who must resort to "cursing" to make his "point". I'd rather deal with some profanity than with an absolute f.cking idiot and pathological liar such as yourself.
Most with good judgment would, too.
Dan Abel - 10 Apr 2008 20:51 GMT In article <6571d450-1056-47bc-985b-83df81c87ef7@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
[snipped comments by Otis]
> > This afternoon me and Andrew Judd shared an interested little chat on > > Yahoo Instant Messenger. I think he was slightly frustrated at the end [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > moment......we can arrange a time though > > Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:13:45 PM): sure no prob [snipped 1800 words, according to MS Word]
> > Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 12:38:45 PM): hey andrew I don't want to > > intrude on your ... > > > > read more » I am amazed at how patient Andrew can be before finally losing his temper.
 Signature Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel@sonic.net
Zetsu - 10 Apr 2008 21:03 GMT > I am amazed at how patient Andrew can be before finally losing his > temper. Yeah, he was really annoyed with me! I thought he was gonna' explode the screen!
Ms.Brainy - 12 Apr 2008 04:47 GMT > > I am amazed at how patient Andrew can be before finally losing his > > temper. > > Yeah, he was really annoyed with me! > I thought he was gonna' explode the screen! This conversation is NOT interesting! The Bates fairy tales you continue to post are boring. Your posts are viewed by most readers on s.m.v as spam. What's driving you? What are you trying to achieve? Poor Jason is high again on speed, but his vision is not yet, and will not be, perfect. But the blind faith these two juveniles have in an outdated, unproven and flat wrong theory, combined with naive arrogance, is amazing. Why don't you join Jehovah Witnesses?
Szczepan Bialek - 12 Apr 2008 09:31 GMT "Ms.Brainy" <
>The Bates fairy tales you continue to post are boring. Your posts are viewed by most readers on s.m.v as spam. What's driving you? What are you trying to achieve?
Maybe that your opinion is common. But for me The Bates publications selected by Zetsu are the only source of real knowledge about eyes. But they must be read with understanding. Now we know a little more about the nerve system so Dr Bates language my be incorrectly understand. S*
Zetsu - 12 Apr 2008 12:04 GMT >The Bates fairy tales you continue to post are boring. I have not (yet) posted any of the fairy tales. But don't worry, they'll come soon!
>Why don't you join Jehovah Witnesses? Are you mocking the Jehovah Witnesses? Isn't that like, "religionist" or something
Jason Sperry - 12 Apr 2008 17:52 GMT > This conversation is NOT interesting! I think it's very interesting indeed. If you think it's not, then why are you posting a reply to this thread?
> The Bates fairy tales you continue to post are boring. I love reading Bates fairy tales.
> Your posts are viewed by most readers on s.m.v as spam. > What's driving you? What are you trying to achieve? > Poor Jason is high again on speed, but his vision is not yet, and will > not be, perfect. But the blind faith these two juveniles have in an I have not and never will use harmful drugs like speed. And my vision is perfect sometimes, just not all the time, yet. Then again, how would you know, anyway? Even if I told you, you'd just think I'm lying.
> outdated, unproven and flat wrong theory, combined with naive > arrogance, is amazing. How can one have blind faith in something which they proved to themselves to derive excellent benefit from?
And as for "outdated," "unproven" and "flat wrong theory," congratulations on defining "conventional optometry"!!!!! =D
> Why don't you join Jehovah Witnesses? Why don't you go preach it, along with all your other blind SMV friends?
otisbrown@embarqmail.com - 13 Apr 2008 21:34 GMT Dear Question-asking friends,
OBJECTION to the minus lens -- is the second-opinion.
Asking questions is the first step in new knowledge.
People who don't like questions and new concepts -- don't learn anything new.
A lot of difficulties depend on how, exactly you define your words describing the dynamic behavior of the natural eye.
Enjoy,
> > This conversation is NOT interesting! > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > Why don't you go preach it, along with all your other blind SMV > friends? Zetsu - 13 Apr 2008 23:26 GMT Subject: I agree.
I must "agree" with Otis -- on this sensitive topic. It is this SUBJECT, which is the "second opinion".
Certainly, one must keep an open "mind" to these issues.
Just one man's opinion.
Don W - 14 Apr 2008 02:11 GMT > Subject: I agree. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Just one man's opinion. Man's or gentleman's?
Don W - 10 Apr 2008 20:36 GMT >"I think he was slightly frustrated at the end > because he was using a lot of cursing against me! I second the commotion.
Zetsu - 10 Apr 2008 20:40 GMT > >"I think he was slightly frustrated at the end > > because he was using a lot of cursing against me! > > I second the commotion. Sorry, I don't understand. What do you mean?
spammer - 11 Apr 2008 03:53 GMT > > >"I think he was slightly frustrated at the end > > > because he was using a lot of cursing against me! > > > I second the commotion. > > Sorry, I don't understand. What do you mean? Of course you don't understand.
Jason Sperry - 11 Apr 2008 04:28 GMT looooooool Andrew is so crazy!!!
Maybe if he wasn't so nearsighted, he would notice that everyone who has perfect sight uses the Bates method to maintain their relaxed personality! I frequently see them swing and even palm, all unconsciously! It's everywhere!!! And it's sooo contagious! =DDD
And Zetsu, you are TOTALLY right. Rest of the mind absolutely MUST precede the personality change (which is inevitable when one uses the methods of the normal eye).
Andrew's method is the slow, hard, and harsh way. The Bates method is the fast, easy, and fun way!
And it's sooooo funny cuz I realize that when I do the Bates method in public, people start being very friendly to me and treat me as if I am any old normal kid, like I am their friend.
Andrew must have a twisted perception on what Dr. Bates was really writing about. He needs a reality check + a Bates book reread. =D
He seems like a pretty rude man, too...a hypocrite...I really wouldn't wanna be friends with him until he has experienced a full cure LOL.
BTW, why the f*** are some SMV participants complaining about posting this conversation on a public forum? Zetsu politely asked him if he would mind, and instead of answering him, he basically insulted him. What would a normal person do in that situation, lol?? You could tell Andrew asked for it...
Anyway, what is there to be embarrassed about anyway? Seriously, only people with imperfect sight get embarrassed!!!
PS: I have not read the entire convo fully yet though, so I might post more later after I've finished reading.
Jason Sperry - 11 Apr 2008 09:43 GMT WOW.....I just read a little bit more of the conversation.
All I can say is WAY TO GO ON POSTING THIS ON SMV!!!
Not only does it give many insights into the cure of imperfect sight without glasses (if you take Zetsu's advice and discard most of Andrew's), but it is SOOO humorous how Andrew uses swear words!!!!! =DDD
Jason Sperry - 11 Apr 2008 12:32 GMT Hi Zetsu and other interested participants of SMV,
What is really surprising to me is that Andrew is 52 years old. Not only does he have severe anger problems, but compared to Hatake Kakashi (Zetsu), who's only 16, his level of intelligence is so low that I burst out laughing many times. In fact, I believe it sets the new world record for adult stupidity! Of course it only adds to the comedy when the 16-year-old genius starts to argue with the 52-year- old idiot.
(I usually don't enjoy being so mean and so blunt, but I can't help but tell the truth as I see it.)
Another observation: Andrew is THE biggest hypocrite I've ever encountered. He's also very skilled in shooting abusive remarks toward his "opponent" that perfectly describe himself, before the "opponent" gets a chance to say the same about him!
I'm afraid Andrew has tied himself into a stubborn knot of strain. He seems to be living in his own perverted reality, where all mental functions are temporarily lowered. If only he'd realize that the way to perfect mental rest is easier than he's letting it be...
Just my constructive criticism,
Jason
Neil Brooks - 11 Apr 2008 13:56 GMT > Just my constructive criticism, There's really nothing constructive, nor additive, about it.
Just a couple of misanthropic adolescent trolls who, seemingly, seek to suck the utility out of this once good and decent forum.
I fear you're on the verge of succeeding.
Big congratulations to you......
Jason Sperry - 11 Apr 2008 14:12 GMT > > Just my constructive criticism, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Big congratulations to you...... LOL your insults are so very stupid... =D
"MISANTHROPIC." LMAO. do you need a dictionary, man? or maybe you just haven't graduated from high school...
Which one is it? Because neither I nor Zetsu are misanthropic. However, you got "adolescent" right. YOU RECEIVE ONE POINT! =D
I could go on, but arguing with an idiot is a waste of time, really.
Of course you wouldn't realize how i am not adding constructive criticism to the discussion because you are on ... a ... different ... planet.
Sucks for you. =D
Jason Sperry - 11 Apr 2008 14:15 GMT > Of course you wouldn't realize how i am not adding constructive > criticism to the discussion because you are on ... a ... different ... > planet. I meant:
Of course you wouldn't realize how I am adding constructive criticism to the discussion because you are on ... a ... different ... planet.
Jason Sperry - 11 Apr 2008 14:18 GMT And as for "trolls," I think you yet again need to reach for your dictionary. I believe I saw the words "Neil Brooks" last time I checked.
But your dictionary is different than mine.
LOL
Dan Abel - 11 Apr 2008 18:09 GMT In article <209f9925-698e-4b9e-b730-e1f0659c09fa@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
> > Of course you wouldn't realize how i am not adding constructive > > criticism to the discussion because you are on ... a ... different ... [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > different ... > planet. You had it right the first time. What totally blows me away, is that you have written six posts in reply to a post that you admit that you haven't finished reading yet!
What planet did you say you and whatsitsnametoday are from?
 Signature Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA dabel@sonic.net
Don W - 11 Apr 2008 19:46 GMT > What planet did you say you and whatsitsnametoday are from? Krypton. Next question please.
Zetsu - 11 Apr 2008 20:13 GMT My name is Clark Kent, sir. *Casually pushes glasses up nose* Why, I am just an ordinary human being Krypton? Never heard of it! *whistles innocently*
Zetsu - 11 Apr 2008 20:22 GMT BTW, it so happens that Jason is from Tatooine. He is very skilled in the Force, so you better not annoy him. I heard he is even more powerful than Yoda himself.
Don W - 11 Apr 2008 23:07 GMT Please don't answer my comments to someone else. (Impolite contemptible "free speech" -- not really addressed to you)
aqaqz1@yahoo.com - 12 Apr 2008 03:17 GMT > Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:09:04 PM): sori , my internet disconectedd > Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:09:10 PM): im back [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > socming > Hatake Kakashi (4/10/2008 1:14:08 PM): then act like your 52 the 52 yr old fails cause he cant receive criticism like a man
aqaqz1@yahoo.com - 12 Apr 2008 03:20 GMT and since i have prefect vizion this stuff sucks anyway lol
|
|
|