Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2008
How to Cure Eye Troubles - At the Nearpoint - By Zetsu
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Zetsu - 31 Mar 2008 18:16 GMT Do you read imperfectly? Do you need to push the paper away for it to become clear? Does it get blurry close up? Well, listen up closely, because the situation is not as hopeless as you have deemed it to be. There IS a cure! But it just needs to be practiced with dedication, intelligently, - and most importantly of all, without effort.
Now when I say 'without effort' there should hopefully no confusion, in that I don't mean 'don't try *out* x ' - (of course not, because otherwise if you didn't try anything how will you ever restore your sight?), I mean, don't exhibit a strain to do it. Someone in the magazines once suggested a better word would be to 'venture', as opposed to 'try'. In any case, remember that making any effort is futile, retarding one's cure, and not only futile but also en route to spoiling your sight all over again!
Anyway, Zetsu is going to be very nice and show you exactly how to begin fine print treatment. Fine print is one of the very best, most efficient ways to improve sight at the nearpoint, and in general to improve the health of the eyes.
To make things clearer, I have provided some screenshots which you can find at the-end.
First things first, you have to read the original 1920s book and the magazines, and start the restful practices. The next thing is this:
1. Open Microsoft Word, or whatever text editor you use (so long as it's got the main editorial features and a couple more - wouldn't advise Notepad though).
2. Go on the internet, type in:
www.central-fixation.com
Then, go over to the Better Eyesight Magazine. Get one month's worth of any magazine you like, esp. one that you have enjoyed in the past and found motivational.
Tap ctrl+a and highlight everything.
Tap ctrl+c (copy).
Go back to Microsoft Word.
Paste (ctrl+v).
Now edit it as appropriate (there might be some abnormalities in various places, just sort them out). Don't worry about typos, they are not important. Make sure the layout hasn't been messed up etc.
So now we've got to make it look nice, so that you'll actually enjoy reading it while you practice. Because as you may know, boredem is injurious to the sight and anything that awakens interest is beneficial.
Highlight everything again, and make it into a font you enjoy, one you find restful and eye catching - standard fonts are good because they are clear and easy to read. Personally, I use Times New Roman, Calibri, or Arial.
Keep the colour as black on white, because this is easiest for the printer, clearest for the vision and often the most effective for your eyemind training.
Now, the most important thing - size. Set the titles to '3' and the main body to '1.5'. (You have to type it in manually because there are no presets at this size.) The reason I did not choose to go lower than this is because many inkjet printers become unable to give a clear print below 1.5 point type. It starts to get blurry. 1.5 should be fine, if you have a fairly decent printer.
Make sure you are not almost out of ink, as this can ruin the experience and the purpose of the treatment (black becomes gray, and many other such abberations). A full ink cartrige means that it doesn't need to spare ink and therefore can utilize the needed amount to give the best quality of print.
Quality of the print is VERY important.
If the quality of the ink is bad, then you will not benefit half as much because you will have an imperfect memory of the letters whenever you try Bates' memory techniques. Perfect black, or an approximation as close to perfect as possible, is VITAL.
Go to 'columns' in the upper task pane, highlight everything and split it into three. Go to borders, and create a textual border.
Then you've got to print it, of course.
In the settings, make sure it's set to Best Quality! It will be worth it! Don't use FastDraft just to spare a bit of little ink and time. Because it will come out crap afterwords, trust me.
Now one advisable suggestion - if you have got any - use high quality glossy paper, because this will make things a whole lot nicer.
Print it off. Oh, lovely huh!
Ah but - wait, is it all just a faint smear of blur to you? Well, if so then you need to get practicing!
Go out into the bright sunlight. If the light hurts your eyes, or it induces you to involuntarily squint your eyes half shut, then it means you are not yet accustomed and means you need some training - otherwise all the other methods employed to relieve strain and secure rest will be far less effective.
So, get accustomed. Take it in incremental steps, don't go all out and look right at the sun, because that's dangerous. Whatever ever you do, don't stare at the sun. That will burn out your eyes, for sure. Take it very easy, follow your intuition, if your eyes want to close them let them. Keep up the practice, and do it well, and soon you'll be able to open your eyes in any bright light with ease.
When you are able to look into bright lights easily and openly, and not suffer the afterglow (floaters, etc.) then you have made a sufficiently great deal of progress to secure benefit from the other methods.
So, back to fine print practice.
Now you that you are in the bright light, the fine print should at first still be a faint blur, but don't worry about that. Don't make an effort to see. Bring the print very close to your eyes. Look at the white spaces in between the lines, and think of the whitest thing you can while you do it. Think of snow, white pillow, and such like. Make no effort to do this, but let it come into your mind of its own accord.
Close your eyes, and continue imagining the same thing, just as if you were still looking at the print. Alternate this with doing it with the eyes open.
If you have been able to relax, even for a miniscular amount of time, you may open your eyes and get a flash of clear vision. Close your eyes again before you have time to read anything and let the strain come back. Continue this treatment.
Now, if you practice faithfully over several days, you will find that these tiny flashes will become more prolonged until you are able to rest yourself at will, and to sustain the relaxation obtained 24/7.
Then, move onto the next level. This is where things get interesting.
Wait until night falls. Get a candle, a match, and light up a flame. Ensure all electrical or other external lights are out. Go somewhere solitary where you are not likely to be interrupted by disturbed and somewhat confused looking passerbyers (i.e. 'dude, what the hell are you doing?').
So then now, you have begun the REAL stuff!
Bring the print so close that it's up against your very face. All a blur, again, huh? Not to fear! Now, you will feel the wonderful effects of the candle. The eyemind will enjoy very much the steady or sometimes abrupt flicker emitted by the light - changes in conditions is something restful and relaxing.
Keep up the practice as per earlier. Read Dr. Bates' book and magazine if you do not understand how to practice. Remember that his work is the very BEST source of True knowledge in the cure of imperfect sight. With time and practice you will find that, your accomodative range will get nearer and nearer until it's absolutely perfect, and then you can even move on to supernormal vision, like that girl who was able to discern cells! Forget using silly old microscopes!
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6200/bem06vk3.png http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/1/bem05rz3.png http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/573/bem04rd1.png http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/3421/bem03dh0.png http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/3725/bem02gz2.png http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/9883/bem01cy4.png
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 01 Apr 2008 01:39 GMT > Do you read imperfectly? Do you need to push the paper away for it to > become clear? Does it get blurry close up? Well, listen up closely, > because the situation is not as hopeless as you have deemed it to be. > There IS a cure! But it just needs to be practiced with dedication, are you going to cure hyperopia (farsightedness)? or presbyopia?
are you changing the length of the eyeball? are you changing the anatomy of the crystalline lens?
please explain in concise medical terms exactly what part of the anatomy of the human eye you are affecting with your procedure. how does it work? I know a little about the eye so I think I can understand your explanation-- no need to water it down any. Just lay it on me.
Mike Tyner - 01 Apr 2008 03:20 GMT > There IS a cure! But it just needs to be practiced with dedication, > intelligently, - and most importantly of all, without effort. Fraud.
-MT
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 01 Apr 2008 05:53 GMT > Do you read imperfectly? Do you need to push the paper away for it to > become clear? Does it get blurry close up? Well, listen up closely, [quoted text clipped - 100 lines] > induces you to involuntarily squint your eyes half shut, then it means > you are not yet accustomed and means you need some training perhaps it means nothing more than the light is too bright. take a few minutes to let your eyes light-adapt and everything will be fine.
> Now, if you practice faithfully over several days, you will find that > these tiny flashes will become more prolonged until you are able to > rest yourself at will, and to sustain the relaxation obtained 24/7. but studies of the anatomy of most myope's eyes shows that proportionally they have an elongated axial length. there is no "relaxation" that I am aware of that can cause 20/20 focus to be restored on the retina of axial myopes without using refractive surgery or lens correction.
how do you think that relaxation can shorten the eye? or flatten the corneal surface?
> Then, move onto the next level. > This is where things get interesting. in the next level, is there any part of your suggestions that is actually PROVEN, or at least has a rational foundation in science or medicine?
Zetsu - 01 Apr 2008 11:47 GMT >are you going to cure hyperopia (farsightedness)? or presbyopia? BOTH! It works with both. ALL REFRACTIVE ERRORS ARE CURABLE! Read the 1920 book and the magazines and then you wouldn't be asking me these rudimentary questions!
>please explain in concise medical terms exactly I am not a doctor. I don't know how it works. THAT'S FOR YOU TO FIND OUT, DOC! Start the experimenting. Begin the cure of imperfect sight.
>no need to water it down any. Just lay >it on me. Bates has MADE A THEORY ALREADY in his 1920 book. You don't have to believe it if you don't want to, but that's how Bates thought it happens. You can go ahead and make your own explanation. Just TRY first, test later!
>perhaps it means nothing more than the light is too bright. take a few >minutes to let your eyes light-adapt and everything will be fine. YES. PRECISELY! It's as simple as that!
>but studies of the anatomy of most myope's eyes WTF! Why change the subject to MYOPES? DID I MENTION THAT EVEN?
Zetsu - 01 Apr 2008 11:54 GMT >but studies of the anatomy of most myope's eyes shows that >proportionally they have an elongated axial length. there is no >"relaxation" that I am aware of that can cause 20/20 focus to be >restored on the retina of axial myopes without using refractive >surgery or lens correction. GOOD LOGIC! Since you're not aware of it, IT MUST NOT EXIST.
:O Am I really in a SCIENTIFIC newsgroup, or something else?
>how do you think that relaxation can shorten the eye? or flatten the >corneal surface? I DUNNO. YOU TELL ME, DOC!
Zetsu - 01 Apr 2008 13:52 GMT I took some pics of how it ends up if you followed my instructions. See below. My camera is kind of crap so it doesn't look that sharp, but in real life it's downright amazing! It's the sharpest thing I've ever seen.
I discovered something else too, just this morning. In MSWord, you can make the quality into SUPER HIGH mode! Go to the printing options and select it as: Best, 1400 DPI. It just looks SO crystal clear, especially with the glossy paper! It's just exactly what I would call a 'digital remastering' :D. (But you need to have an inkjet printer to be able to enable this mode.)
http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/7260/fineprint01sm2.jpg http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/3441/fineprint02rg8.jpg http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/5488/fineprint03pe3.jpg http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/8071/fineprint04kl9.jpg http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/4614/fineprint05bg6.jpg
Mike Tyner - 01 Apr 2008 14:13 GMT > GOOD LOGIC! Since you're not aware of it, IT MUST NOT EXIST. > :O Am I really in a SCIENTIFIC newsgroup, or something else? You're in the fraud newsgroup, where any idiot can assert anything they like.
>>how do you think that relaxation can shorten the eye? or flatten the >>corneal surface? > > I DUNNO. YOU TELL ME, DOC! How can anyone explain something that doesn't happen?
Tell us how water runs uphill.
Fraud.
-MT
Zetsu - 01 Apr 2008 14:37 GMT Heat the water up a little, and certainly it can.
The process is called 'evaporation'.
Zetsu - 02 Apr 2008 01:56 GMT >So it _doesn't_ work for myopes? Sorry, I'll try and clarify it.
Fine print is ESPECIALLY valuable for farsighted or presbyopic patients, because of course they would likely have trouble with their sight at the near point, and not at the far point. Thus, practicing at the near point with very small print being of the greatest value to patients suffering from such defect.
However, that's not to say that a myope, who might have trouble with distant vision (and see quite satisfactorily well at the near), should not also practice with super fine print without expecing a benefit. Super fine print is a benefit to ANYONE, because to read it requires a continuous relaxation, therefore it is incredibly value in one's cure. It follows that anything which provides relaxation is a help in securing even greater relaxation with the aid of other methods - memory, snellen, swinging, palming, etc.
For example, one might regard a letter of fine print, and if that person is a myope (or anyone suffering from vision trouble at the distance), they could then bring back that same letter into their mind whenever they look into the distance later on. Since a myope is likely to see letters at the near point quite well (although, never perfectly as one cannot have imperfect sight at the distance and simultaneously perfect at the near), and since it is impossible to remember anything perfectly or more perfectly than what one is seeing without acquiring an improvement in the sight, it follows that the method of fine print treatment can indeed be of IMMENSE value to a myope.
So to reiterate it in brevity: YES it does work for myopes, however it is ESPECIALLY good for curing near point trouble.
However, the reason I acted with rudeness to pclar's comments was because, he suddenly changed the subject to MYOPES, which I have never specified anywhere in my original post. All I have said is that one should try it if they 'read imperfectly'. That does not imply any specific condition of refraction, let alone one which is manifest at the distance. Furthermore, normally, one assumes that one reads from a distance of no more than a few inches, and one could therefore describe this as the 'nearpoint'.
Since what we are discussing was not aimed at myopes specifically, nor any other condition of refraction, it was unreasonable for pclar to make any statement about the refraction of a myope at all, and to add insult to injury, with the implication being that he was unaware of any method of treatment that can reduce axial myopia or other structural problems, therefore it looked to me that his logic was: "Since I never saw it, it can't be true." (Which is a fallacy.)
That's what impulsed my vulgar reaction.
Mike Tyner - 02 Apr 2008 02:11 GMT > So to reiterate it in brevity: YES it does work for myopes, however it > is ESPECIALLY good for curing near point trouble. And to reiterate even more briefly:
YOU ARE A FRAUD.
-MT
Mike Tyner - 02 Apr 2008 02:04 GMT > Heat the water up a little, and certainly it can. > > The process is called 'evaporation'. Your results are vapor, too.
-MT
Zetsu - 02 Apr 2008 02:11 GMT Hmm... and vapor travels in an upwards slope...
Because vapor is a lighter substance so it goes upwards...
So, that's how you get water to run uphill (in answer to your earlier question). "Tell us how water runs uphill"
Mike Tyner - 02 Apr 2008 02:17 GMT > So, that's how you get water to run uphill (in answer to your earlier > question). "Tell us how water runs uphill" And you're still a fraud.
-MT
Zetsu - 02 Apr 2008 02:22 GMT How? I just googled for 'define: fraud'.
This comes up:
1. intentional deception resulting in injury to another person 2. imposter: a person who makes deceitful pretenses 3. something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage
But I don't think I am any of these... =( I'm just nice, good.
Mike Tyner - 02 Apr 2008 03:03 GMT > 1. intentional deception resulting in injury to another person There is injury when your disciples avoid conventional treatment. For others, you just waste time and effort.
But the deception is intentional, as you surely KNOW that your "cures" only work by relaxing accommodative myopia and training blur interpretation. You surely KNOW that you aren't actually shrinking the eye or restoring flexibility to the presbyopic lens. You surely KNOW that your "rest methods" do nothing for retinitis pigmentosa, cataract or glaucoma. If you didn't, you do now.
> 2. imposter: a person who makes deceitful pretenses Yes, your pretenses are deceitful. Your claims of successful treatment are impossible to prove. Your claims that "rest methods" cure organic disease are outrageous.
> 3. something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain > an advantage The advantage is that warm fuzzy feeling you get by putting yourself forward as an authority on a nonexistent, nonsense treatment.
It's mental masturbation... feels good for you but it doesn't really do anything for anyone else.
> I'm just nice, good. From here you appear to be a fraud with a handful of chubby.
-MT
Zetsu - 02 Apr 2008 03:23 GMT You have it all wrong, dear friend! My intentions are quite pure, and not deceitful. I am doing what I am doing out of compassion, because I know that many people can be helped by the cure of imperfect sight as devised by Dr. Bates. If you had a cure for cancer, and knew it worked, but didn't have the trials and tests to prove it, then wouldn't you feel bad to not recommend it to everyone?
So it is with myself.
Simon Dean - 05 Apr 2008 21:57 GMT > Hmm... and vapor travels in an upwards slope... > > Because vapor is a lighter substance so it goes upwards... > > So, that's how you get water to run uphill (in answer to your earlier > question). "Tell us how water runs uphill" Vapor isn't water.
Mike Tyner - 01 Apr 2008 14:04 GMT > BOTH! It works with both. ALL REFRACTIVE ERRORS ARE CURABLE! Fraud.
> I am not a doctor. I don't know how it works. Correction: You don't know that it works.
> WTF! Why change the subject to MYOPES? DID I MENTION THAT EVEN? So it _doesn't_ work for myopes?
Fraud.
-MT
|
|
|