I developed bilateral monocular diploplia. Its onset was rapid and
dramatic. It is very noticeable on high contrast items such as road
crossing signs, traffic lights, printed pages in books, etc. It is
mostly 2 images vertically displaced by about 2 degrees. After a few
days it became intermittent. Sometimes there are up to 6 distinct
images when lookig at a small point source of light. The effect goes
away with a pin hole. An eye doctor examined my eyes. He said the
eye glass prescription is correct, my retina and cornea look good, my
lenses have slight defects but are normal for a 67 year old male but
may be the cause of the problem. He is an OD and did a through exam
which included dilating my eyes. I asked about a visual cortex
dysfunction. He didn't think so but said would try a visual field
test.
To get a second opinion I went to a MD physician ophthalmologist. He
did a short eye exam and did not dilate my eyes. He said eyes look
good, lens has very slight yellowing, no cataracts. He spent about
1/4 the time the OD did on the eye exam. His conclusion glass
prescription off by .25 diopters in one eye, astigmatism angle off by
a few degrees in other eye. He said try new glasses and if that does
not work hard contact lenses may be the solution. New glasses not
making any difference yet
I went back to the OD for the visual field test. I have missing area
in both eyes looking towards my nose. Conclusion was
the results were inconclusive. He said my case is unusual and he had
conferred with at least two doctors about it. He now thinks it is
cataracts, that change of glasses or contact lenses will do no good.
He has credibility on these points because he is associated with a
store that sells glasses. The two doctors he consulted with were a
neurologist and and cataract specialist who is also interested in
nerve function. He recommended the latter. I have an appointment in
a month. Upon more questioning he still thought cataracts were most
likely even though the only symptom I have is double vision. He said
that sudden onset is unusual but possible. His explanation of the
multiple images is inclusions in the lens forming bubbles that act as
small lenses.
The condition is annoying but not a show stopper by any means. I am
under the impression from both the MD and the OD that there is nothing
that should be done at this time unless it gets much worse. The MD
and the OD seem to be exactly out of phase in the diagnoses.
So the questions are what causes of sudden bilateral monocular double
vision? Does the OD or the MD have a more reasonable explanation?
What else should I do at this point?
Thanks
Mike Tyner - 30 Mar 2008 01:52 GMT
> So the questions are what causes of sudden bilateral monocular double
> vision? Does the OD or the MD have a more reasonable explanation?
> What else should I do at this point?
There are only two places in the light path where monocular diplopia can
reasonably occur, the cornea and the lens.
It's easy enough to rule out the cornea but they probably didn't bother.
Compared to the lens, the cornea almost never develops sudden irregularities
on both sides at this age. At age 67, we'd always suspect the lens first.
At age 27, the lens is nice and homogeneous. The index of refraction isn't
uniform, but it's a smooth gradient without discontinuities.
At age 67. the lens develops irregularities internally, often arranged like
pie-wedges or spokes. Sometimes though a dilated pupil, you can move the
scope side-to-side a few millimeters and see the retinal image jump, as
though the lens has optical "wrinkles" in it. The difference between one
side of a wrinkle and the other is enough to create two independent optical
paths, and diplopia results. You can probably demonstrate the same "jump" by
moving a pinhole around when the diplopia is prominent.
It's a 90% certainty that your diplopia is lenticular. If you want to be 99%
sure, ask them to pop on a gas perm contact with topical anesthesia. Corneal
diplopia will disappear under a rigid contact lens. Lenticular won't.
Surgeons tend to wait until it's obvious before labeling "cataract."
Medicare wants them to wait until vision is measurably impaired. Paying
out-of-pocket, you could probably get it done next week if you wanted to. If
you have significant refractive error (like glasses > +/-200) you may also
consider early cataract surgery for the sake of correcting your vision to
plano.
The visual field abnormalities you described are often artificial, eg due to
a big nose. They don't suggest a specific neurological problem, well
possibly bilateral glaucoma but that's stretching way out there. If it had
been both eyes, _away_ from the nose you'd have been signed right up for a
CT or MRI.
-MT, OD
ray - 31 Mar 2008 18:54 GMT
Thank you for your well thought out and detailed explanation. I have
another appointment in a month and will suggest the contact lens test.
At this time I agree that my problem is almost certainly a lens
problem especially since the diplopia goes away when looking through a
pin hole. The question in my mind that remains is how frequently does
this condition start so rapidly and without the other noticeable
symptoms of cataracts?
My understanding is Medicare pays for cataract surgery when unaided
vision become 20/40. What sort of time frame should I be looking at?
Does the sudden onset have an affect on the time? What is a ballpark
cost of the operation?
My preset correction is -2.5 in both eyes with a .25 cyl correction at
178 right eye, and 30 in left eye.
Thanks
Ray
> So the questions are what causes of sudden bilateral monocular double
> vision? Does the OD or the MD have a more reasonable explanation?
> What else should I do at this point?
There are only two places in the light path where monocular diplopia
can reasonably occur, the cornea and the lens.
It's easy enough to rule out the cornea but they probably didn't
bother. Compared to the lens, the cornea almost never develops sudden
irregularities on both sides at this age. At age 67, we'd always
suspect the lens first.
At age 27, the lens is nice and homogeneous. The index of refraction
isn't uniform, but it's a smooth gradient without discontinuities.
At age 67. the lens develops irregularities internally, often arranged
like pie-wedges or spokes. Sometimes though a dilated pupil, you can
move the scope side-to-side a few millimeters and see the retinal
image jump, as though the lens has optical "wrinkles" in it. The
difference between one side of a wrinkle and the other is enough to
create two independent optical paths, and diplopia results. You can
probably demonstrate the same "jump" by moving a pinhole around when
the diplopia is prominent.
It's a 90% certainty that your diplopia is lenticular. If you want to
be 99% sure, ask them to pop on a gas perm contact with topical
anesthesia. Corneal diplopia will disappear under a rigid contact
lens. Lenticular won't.
Surgeons tend to wait until it's obvious before labeling "cataract."
Medicare wants them to wait until vision is measurably impaired.
Paying out-of-pocket, you could probably get it done next week if you
wanted to. If you have significant refractive error (like glasses >
+/-200) you may also consider early cataract surgery for the sake of
correcting your vision to plano.
The visual field abnormalities you described are often artificial, eg
due to a big nose. They don't suggest a specific neurological problem,
well possibly bilateral glaucoma but that's stretching way out there.
If it had been both eyes, _away_ from the nose you'd have been signed
right up for a CT or MRI.
-MT, OD